从大学生英语考试作弊来看大学考试作弊开除学籍的合法性     

岳瑜 《黑龙江教育学院学报》2011,30(10):31-33

大学生考试作弊,尤其是在英语考试中作弊,已成为大学校园里见怪不怪的现象,它不仅破坏了考试公平、公正的原则,而且败坏了良好的学风和校风。不健全的法律制度和不完善的考试管理机制是大学生考试作弊的主要原因之一。基于此,通过考试作弊开除学籍的法理分析,对大学依法治校、依法治考进行反思。在此基础上,建议建立健全大学生的诚信机制,建立学生诚信档案;改革教育评价体系,注重学生实际能力;通过立法形式规范考试管理,以期进一步净化大学考试环境。  相似文献   

利用电子档案袋系统促进学生的全面发展     

赖文继 《桂林师范高等专科学校学报》2011,25(4):193-196

基于信患技术的电子档案袋系统在全面评价学生的发展和能力方面具有优越性．文章对电子档案袋评价体系作了探究,提出了一些如何用好这个系统的策略,对学校运用电子档案袋促进学生成长有一定的指导意义．  相似文献   

复杂性思维与成人教育课程评价     

高志宏 《成人教育》2011,31(7):54-55

当前我国成人教育课程评价存在着单一化、静态化和封闭化等诸多问题,这些均不利于课程的健康发展和成人的全面发展,＂复杂性思维＂作为研究复杂现象、复杂问题和复杂系统的新的思维方式,可深刻认识事物本来的复杂面目、理解和把握事物的发展及其变化。它给课程评价提供了一种新的视角,使课程评价由单一走向综合,由一元走向多元,由静态走向动态,由封闭走向开放。  相似文献   

中国就业政策评价:1998-2008   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

赖德胜  孟大虎  李长安  田永坡 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2011,(3):110-124

从消极就业政策到积极就业政策的转变,标志着中国政府以更为积极的姿态来处理就业问题。估算结果表明,1998-2008年,我国政府为落实就业政策累计支出6169.67亿元,其中用于落实消极就业政策的支出为4144.06亿元,落实积极就业政策的支出为2025.61亿元。实证分析发现,落实积极就业政策的支出和落实消极就业政策的支出与下岗失业人员的再就业之间存在长期稳定关系,落实积极就业政策的支出每变动1%会导致下岗失业人员的再就业数量同向变动0.27%,说明我国政府用于促进就业的支出的确对再就业工作显示出了积极作用;而落实消极就业政策的支出每变动1%将引起下岗失业人员的再就业数量反向变动1.05%,这一结果表明落实消极就业政策的支出吸引了更多的失业下岗人员加入失业保险体系,同时发挥出了一种"社会稳定器"的功能。  相似文献   

英语教学法课学业成就发展性评价研究     

刘玲 《安徽科技学院学报》2011,25(6):100-103

本文针对高师英语教学法课测试性评价偏重考察学生对知识的认知情况,缺乏对学生在学习过程中的情感态度、应用能力形成性的价值判断,导致学生不能及时地反思和调整自己的学习状态,非智力因素和后继学习的潜能得不到有效地开发等问题展开研究。重点探讨如何运用发展性评价的原则、方法和工具对学生在英语教学法课学习过程中的认知能力、情感态度和动作技能进行科学、全面地评价,旨在证实发展性评价对促进英语师范生综合能力全面提高的良好效应。  相似文献   

教师专业能力自评分层命题的求证——《教师专业发展自评量规表》有效设计的实证性研究   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

高翔 《教师教育研究》2011,23(3)

试从架构的视角解析自评分层下专业发展维度和指标体系,要对自评分层量规表的实施流程、运行方式和管理途径,从组织行为学的角度审视它的可行性。学校管理要审视通过自评是否提升了教师自我意向?同事的互助性评价和教学研究共同体的协商性评价是否唤醒了教师专业发展的意识?行政评价对教师专业发展的定向和规劝是否具有真实的效度?通过对专业分层指标细则的研修,教师是否形成个性化的专业规划?通过自评、互助性评价和协商性评价的管理,我们是否实现了管理目标的聚合?基于分层后项目的自主运行是否具有个性化的特征?这都是对教师专业能力实施评价分层解答的问题。  相似文献   

提高稿件初审效率和质量的新方法——以《仿生工程学报》实践为例     

王丹 《编辑学报》2019,31(3):279-281

为了在保证期刊的学术质量的基础上,提高稿件初审的效率,本文结合编辑部的工作实际,提出了一种从稿件最后的结论开始看起,反向追溯作者的研究过程,以提问的方式一路质疑到引言部分的初审方法。实践结果表明通过这种方式对文章进行梳理,可以快速地对文章的科学性和逻辑性做出判断,从而高效地完成初审工作,并有助于给出明确的让作者信服的初审意见。此外,还指出了几点初审中应注意的问题。  相似文献   

Exploring the forward citation patterns of patents based on the evolution of technology fields     

Su Jung Jee  Minji Kwon  Jung Moon Ha  So Young Sohn 《Journal of Informetrics》2019,13(4):100985

Forward citations of patents have been used extensively to capture the impact of technological knowledge. However, our understanding of the factors shaping patent citation patterns remains limited. One of the main limitations is the lack of scholarly attention paid to the dynamic influences arising from the evolution of technology fields. From an evolutionary perspective, technological impact is not simply determined by the static attributes of a technology itself; it is also dynamically affected by changes in the external conditions. Drawing on this viewpoint, this study suggests a model for understanding patent citation patterns by reflecting the evolution of the technology fields to which each patent belongs. Four such factors are explored: technology cycle time, potential of technological convergence, popularity of the technology field, and technological novelty. Based on the proposed model, we show how expected citation patterns can change as a result of different scenarios for technology field evolution. We conduct a case study of patents in the information technology and healthcare industries to show citation patterns of patents across heterogeneous industries as well as those within an industry. Contributions to the innovation literature and research investment decisions are discussed.  相似文献   

Evaluating research and researchers by the journal impact factor: Is it better than coin flipping?     

Ricardo Brito  Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro 《Journal of Informetrics》2019,13(1):314-324

The journal impact factor (JIF) is the average of the number of citations of the papers published in a journal, calculated according to a specific formula; it is extensively used for the evaluation of research and researchers. The method assumes that all papers in a journal have the same scientific merit, which is measured by the JIF of the publishing journal. This implies that the number of citations measures scientific merits but the JIF does not evaluate each individual paper by its own number of citations. Therefore, in the comparative evaluation of two papers, the use of the JIF implies a risk of failure, which occurs when a paper in the journal with the lower JIF is compared to another with fewer citations in the journal with the higher JIF. To quantify this risk of failure, this study calculates the failure probabilities, taking advantage of the lognormal distribution of citations. In two journals whose JIFs are ten-fold different, the failure probability is low. However, in most cases when two papers are compared, the JIFs of the journals are not so different. Then, the failure probability can be close to 0.5, which is equivalent to evaluating by coin flipping.  相似文献   

Challenges of measuring software impact through citations: An examination of the lme4 R package     

Kai Li  Pei-Ying Chen  Erjia Yan 《Journal of Informetrics》2019,13(1):449-461

The rise of software as a research object is mirrored by increasing interests in quantitative studies of scientific software. However, inconsistent citation practices have led most existing studies of this type to base their analysis of software impact on software name mentions, as identified in full-text publications. Despite its limitations, citation data exists in much greater quantities and covers a broader array of scientific fields than full-text data, and thus can support investigations with much wider scope. This paper aims to analyze the extent to which citation data can be used to reconstruct the impact of software. Specifically, we identify the variety of citable objects related to the lme4 R package and examine how the package’s impact is dispersed across these objects. Our results shed light on a little-discussed challenge of using citation data to measure software impact: even within the category of formal citation, the same software object might be cited in different forms. We consider the implications of this challenge and propose a method to reconstruct the impact of lme4 through its citations nonetheless.  相似文献