从外籍编委审校英文摘要看编校英文摘要应注意的问题   总被引：15，自引：1，他引：14  

邓芳明  龚学民 《编辑学报》2007,19(1):20-22

通过比较、分析以英语为母语的外籍编委审校的英文摘要,总结出我们在编校科技论文英文摘要中出现的问题,并提出了一些提高英文摘要编校水平的建议.  相似文献   

我国科技期刊如何获取国际稿件   总被引：13，自引：2，他引：11  

郑芹珠  任丹青  张慧 《编辑学报》2007,19(2):119-121

以《亚洲男科学杂志》获得国际稿源(70%以上)的经验为主线,分析目前国内英文版科技期刊稿源国际化的现状.提出了有效获取国际稿源的思路,包括:主编无可替代,充分调动国际编委;全方位培养编辑人才,引进和借助优秀人才;重视主动约稿;组织和参加国际性会议;充分利用和整合资源,提供金牌服务;充分利用现代化办公条件;舍得花钱送期刊;打开国际发行渠道.  相似文献   

科技论文初审方法   总被引：7，自引：3，他引：4  

赵茜 《编辑学报》2007,19(4):273-274

科技期刊编辑每天要面对各个专业以及同一专业不同研究方向的来稿,要想准确地把握每一篇稿件是很困难的,但初审又是审稿活动中的基础环节,是提高稿件质量的关键.据此,提出5种初审方法,即审结构、审公式、审数据、审图表、审参考文献,以期提高编辑审读稿件的能力.  相似文献   

做好高校学报的交流与赠阅工作   总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0  

付昌辉 《编辑学报》2007,19(1):63-64

通过分析当前高校学报普遍采用的交流与赠阅方式,发现这些方式产生的影响效果并不理想,还存在着种种的弊端与惊人的浪费.认为高校学报应改变目前的交流与赠阅方式,以促进有效发行.  相似文献   

科技期刊条码中年份码现状调查   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

徐红星  徐云峰  祝贞学 《编辑学报》2007,19(4):281-281

1 条码中的年份码 条码是由一组按特定规则排列的宽窄不同的线条、空格及相应数据字符组成的符号,是一种信息代码.GB/T16827-1997《中国标准刊号(ISSN部分)条码》[1]已于1998年3月1日起实施.  相似文献   

科技期刊在线审稿系统应用中的问题及对策   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

周志新 《编辑学报》2007,19(4):284-285

为缩短审稿时间,降低出版时滞,许多科技期刊编辑部相继建立了在线审稿系统.分析科技期刊在线审稿系统应用中存在的问题,并提出对策.  相似文献   

国际著名检索系统收录我国高校学报的情况分析及应对策略     

高雪山  王晶  钟紫红  贾贤  黄冬华  李忠富  佟建国  张嵘  王蕾  刘淑萍 《编辑学报》2007,19(4):301-303

通过对美国SCI、Ei、MEDLINE、CA 等4种国际著名检索系统收录评价体系及我国高校学报被这4种国际著名检索系统收录情况的分析,认为我国高校学报应从提高学术质量、提升刊物的国际化程度、强化期刊的编排出版规范、缩短出版周期、注意英文写作规范、重视引文分析数据、加强对国际检索机构进行有针对性的宣传并与之动态联系等几方面入手,方能提高被国际著名检索系统收录的可能性.  相似文献   

浅论科技期刊的经营策略     

宫月华 《出版科学》2007,15(6):49-51

科技期刊在传播知识,交流信息的同时,也在努力探讨发展经营之路,无经营特色的期刊没有强大的市场竞争力.因此中国科技期刊走向市场、全面参与国内外期刊市场竞争势在必行.文章分析介绍了中国科技期刊的经营现状,并提出了科技期刊的一些经营策略.  相似文献   

Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero-American scientific journals     

Jon Zabala  Borja González-Albo  Ana García-García  Aurora Garrido-Domínguez  José Ignacio Vidal-Liy  Luis R. Álvarez-Díez  Soledad Hernando-Tundidor  Yara Mostazo-Fernández  Teresa Abejón 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):205-216

This article analyses the review, acceptance and publication dates of a sample of 21,890 articles from 326 Ibero-American scientific journals from all subject areas and countries included in the Latindex Catalogue 2.0 and published between 2018 and 2020 (freely available as an open access dataset). The aim is to discover evaluation and publication times. The evaluation process takes a median of 110 days, the publication process, a median of 82 days, and the whole process, a median of 224 days. Statistical differences are found according to periodicity, subject areas, countries, existence of a printed version and article type (Call for Papers or General articles). From the data we find that the delay in publication is longer than publishers themselves report to the DOAJ. STEM areas present the most similarity in publication patterns, having a higher number of evaluation days (Ed) than publication days (Pd); Arts and Humanities present the opposite pattern, with a higher Pd than Ed. In the case of Social Sciences, the times are similar. General articles and Call for Papers articles differ in terms of Ed, but not Pd, indicating that Call for Papers revisions are faster.  相似文献   

Editorial H-score as a metric of inner authenticity for national scientific journals—Pilot study for the field of pedagogy     

Petr Novotný  Karolína Kotvaltová Sezemská  Romana Schubertová  Vanda Janštová 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):194-204

There is evidence that national scientific journals are important for local communities despite their limited audience due to national languages and topics, like in pedagogy. However, it is not easy to assess the level of scientific rigour of local journals, as most do not have available scientometric data and are often published in minority languages. We hypothesize that a possible manifestation of a latent trait of inner authenticity of the scientific journal (meaning the journal is accepted by a community interested in developing the field which conducts internationally accepted research) could be H-index of the editorial board members. To test this approach, we evaluated H-index and gender of editorial board members (n = 490) from 17 Czech and Slovak national science-oriented scientific pedagogical journals which were not indexed or indexed in Erih+ or Scopus, and compared this with the five lowest-rated journals from the same field indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database. The H-index of editorial board members was somewhat higher in indexed journals with those from WoS showing higher scores, and the number of board members with no discernable H-index was far greater in non-indexed journals. Editorial boards of journals indexed in WoS were mostly male, compared to a dominance of women on boards of non-indexed journals. Acknowledging the limited sample, it appears that the H-index of editorial board members may be a way to value national scientific journals.  相似文献