The issue of who should be included and recognised as professionals in the early childhood education and care (ECEC) service system is both contested and pressing in the current policy climate. At stake is a high-quality early childhood care and education service system that is both responsive and appropriate to the constituency it serves. A review of the history of ECEC professionalism reveals complex entanglements and debates regarding professional belonging. Services that deliver education and care to children and families living in high poverty contexts are often excluded from ECEC professionalism debates. Drawing on notions of rationality, emotionality and criticality presented in recent accounts of ECEC professionalism, we use data collected from interviews with service providers delivering services to children and families living in high poverty contexts in Australia to develop an account of criticality that is pertinent to current funding and policy contexts. We argue that these service providers’ perspectives about their own professionalism have much to offer broader debates. 相似文献
The millennium round of the General Agreement on Tradein Services (GATS) underlines issues relating to the regulationof education as an internationally traded service. Transnationaleducation is a key component of such trade. Southeast Asia issomething of a laboratory in the development and regulation oftransnational education. The region combines high demand, keencompetition among providers, and host country regulatory regimesranging from relatively laissez faire to strongly interventionist.This paper examines the approaches of three Southeast Asiangovernments – Hong Kong, Malaysia and Australia – to theregulation of transnational education within their borders. Ineach case the authors provide background on the higher educationsystem, describe the regulatory approaches to transnationaleducation, and analyse the motivations behind regulation. Boththe neoliberal approach of the WTO to trade in educationalservices, and critiques of this approach, are outlined. Theauthors conclude that any attempts to promote global standards orquality principles for transnational education must address themyriad concerns of governments, including consumer protection,advancing national goals and protecting the local system. 相似文献
In a global environment in which global, national and local nodes relate freely within common networks, all research universities
must pursue strategies for building global capacity and facilitating cross-border staff and student movement and research
collaboration. The study compares readings of the global environment, global and international activities and relationships,
and global capacity and strategy, in two leading national universities, one in a middle level developing country (Indonesia)
and the other in a middle level developed country (Australia). The main tool of investigation was interviews with parallel
groups of institutional leaders and leaders of academic units and research centres, in conjunction with study of the national
and local contexts. It was apparent that in both cases, while global elements are increasingly important in university strategy,
mission and identity, resource capacity remains highly dependant on national government and students. This belies the romantic
myth of the ‘stand-alone’ corporate university in the global marketplace. The two cases also differ in some respects. While
both universities are peak national institutions, and each respects the other, the Australian university is more strongly
placed in the global environment and practical dealings between them are asymmetrical. The study helps to illuminate the dynamics
of global stratification and hierarchy between developed and developing nations and institutions in higher education. 相似文献