排序方式： 共有6条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Conceptual Analysis: A Method for Understanding Information as Evidence, and Evidence as Information
Jonathan Furner 《Archival Science》2004,4(3-4):233-265
The utility of conceptual analysis for archival science is assessed by means of an exploratory evaluation in which the concept
of evidence is analyzed. Usage of the term “evidence” in the philosophies of science, law, and history is briefly reviewed;
candidates for necessary conditions of evidentiariness are identified and examined; and taxonomies are built of evidentiariness
and of archival inference. Correspondences are shown to exist between the concepts of evidentiariness and relevance, and between
the domains of archival science and social epistemology, thereby pointing in promising directions for further research. The
tentative conclusion is reached that conceptual analysis may profitably be used to improve understanding of archival concepts. 相似文献
2.
图书馆知识性和社会性的统一要求知识论和社会学在图书馆学中的结合,并形成两种基于不同中心的结合模式。谢拉的"社会知识论"以社会学为中心,知识论在其中尽管具有重要的实践意义,却局限于传统立场。他的理论因此在实质上接近于"知识社会学"。引入个体知识论或社会学的规范性不能使之转变为社会知识论,应采取以知识论为中心,在其规范性中包含社会学因素的结合模式。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
知识论对于构建图书馆学基础具有重要意义。经典知识论由于个体主义取向的局限性而难以包容图书馆的社会属性,因此有必要在知识论中融合社会维度,由此构成J.H.谢拉提出的"社会知识论"。社会知识论在自身的理论张力中趋向于社会学在经验层面的实证研究而偏离内在固有的知识论目标,因此应当在知识论视野中突出社会交流作为知识的构成要素所应有的本源意义,从而使社会知识论具备足够的哲学深度,以成为图书馆学的"知识论"基础。 相似文献
6.
1