排序方式： 共有31条查询结果，搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
Shannon Regan 《期刊图书馆员》2016,70(1-4):89-99
The responsibility for and the initiative to preserve electronic journal content is neither clear nor easy, and knowing the preservation status of an e-journal is not a basic step within the NASIG Core Competencies for Electronic Resources Librarians life cycle of electronic resources management. Columbia and Cornell University Libraries secured funding for a project to specifically evaluate strategies for expanding e-journal preservation. A wide range of e-journal categories are evaluated within the scope of the project, including: content direct from publishers, small and society publishers, Open Access e-journals, full-text content from third-party content providers, and university generated e-journals. Discussed are techniques for identifying at risk e-journals, integrating preservation into license negotiation with publishers, tracking the preservation status of e-journals, and developing relationships with existing preservation agencies. The quality of future of scholarship and teaching hinges on the preservation of the scholarly record. 相似文献
2.
This study aimed to investigate the scholarly information-seeking behavior of academic engineers and technologists working at the University of the Punjab. The purpose of the study was to investigate the various information sources being used by academic engineers and technologists for their scholarly tasks, with a focus on use patterns of e-journals. A quantitative study employing “survey” method was conducted to achieve the research objectives. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to all regular and contractual academic engineers and technologists working at the university and a response rate of 61% was achieved. The study findings showed that the respondents' most-used information sources were e-journals, e-books, discussion with colleagues, and electronic research reports. They accessed e-journal articles through general search engines, Google Scholar, and open access e-journal websites. Majority of the respondents used e-journals for keeping themselves up-to-date and supervising researchers. While previous studies have investigated academic and practitioner engineers' information-seeking habits, this study is valuable as it investigated academic engineers' and technologists' scholarly information-seeking behavior in relation to their e-journals use patterns. 相似文献
3.
数字学术期刊质量控制的PDCA循环模型,反映出数字学术期刊贯穿出版全过程、全员乃至全社会共同参与的质量控制体系。循环由计划、执行、检查和处理四个环节组成,包含期刊定位、同行评议等11个质量控制关键点,且各关键点在质量控制流程中发挥着各自的功能。整个循环体系以计划环节为龙头,以执行环节为保证,以检查环节为基石,以处理环节为"质变点",以专家评议平台、公众交流平台、公众评议平台以及公众反馈平台为依托,在多执行主体间得以广泛沟通的前提下,形成一个有效运转、呈螺旋式上升的有机整体。 相似文献
4.
Karen Schneider 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1-2):57-62
This article explores the ethics of preservation, both as they have been traditionally established and as they might apply to current and future digital preservation efforts. The first part of the article reviews the literature of the past two decades to see how the preservation community has defined the ethical dimensions of its work, as well as developed guidelines to support an ethical practice. The second part considers digital preservation and the ways it both extends and complicates established ethical tenets. Digital preservation challenges the library community to revisit fundamental preservation practices and responsibilities. Our ability to come to consensus on these issues will be critical for the public's continued trust in our roles as stewards of the cultural record. 相似文献
5.
Denise Branch 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(3-4):315-331
Electronic resources are common in academic libraries. Focus is being placed on ways to provide users with easy access and accomplish tasks at the same time. When e-journals first arrived, libraries created workflows that followed the path of a print journal. These workflows were effective for a while, but are now breaking down. Libraries performed review and analysis to discover problems, and created new workflows. They have learned that workflows need to be constantly reviewed, analyzed, and updated to identify inefficiencies and eliminate them. Libraries must be willing to devote time and energy to maintain effective workflows to prepare for the future. A summary will be provided of one library's transition from a print to an electronic environment and the steps taken to maintain effective workflows through the years. The early days of cloud computing are here and libraries are taking first steps into the cloud. Workflows must be evaluated before moving into the cloud. Migration should be carefully structured for the move. Libraries are witnessing the benefits of the cloud environment. This article will discuss the benefits of maintaining effective workflows in the cloud. Readers will learn about a journey into the cloud with Ex Libris' Alma system. 相似文献
6.
This article reports on a survey of U.S. academic libraries that was conducted in the spring of 2008 to determine if and how academic libraries were actively cataloging e-journals in the age of the OpenURL, A–Z journal lists, and the batch loading of purchased MARC records. 相似文献
7.
《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(3-4):147-162
8.
《Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship》2013,18(1):19-33
Abstract This paper evaluates the comprehensiveness and composition of university library holdings of economics journals of three types of institutions: schools that offer a doctoral degree program in economics; schools that offer a master's degree in economics, and schools that offer only a baccalaureate degree in economics. The results offer useful information for university libraries and economics educators responsible for deciding whether the current holdings should be maintained or, if not, which journals should be added or deleted. 相似文献
9.
[目的/意义] 介绍中国科学院文献情报中心在电子资源科技支撑绩效评价领域开展的工作以及取得的阶段性成果，为科研机构开展电子资源科技支撑绩效评价工作提供有益参考。[方法/过程] 结合国内外电子资源成效评估的理论与实践，构建以外文电子期刊为案例的电子资源科技支撑绩效评价指标体系，并进行实例评价；同时，根据研究所的科技支撑绩效评价需求，补充和完善面向研究所评价目的的电子资源科技支撑绩效评价指标体系。[结果/结论] 通过实例评价，构建的外文电子期刊科技支撑绩效指标体系具有可操作性；同时，融合研究所的评价需求，改造构建形成了满足集团牵头单位和研究所评价需求的外文电子期刊科技支撑评价指标体系，具体包含4个评价方面、16项评价指标。 相似文献
10.
Matthew Harrington 《期刊图书馆员》2017,72(1-4):77-82
ABSTRACTIn early 2014, the Electronic Resource Committee (ERC) of the Triangle Research Libraries Network, which includes Duke University, North Carolina Central University, North Carolina State University, and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, began work to replace a database previously used to assess the value of consortially negotiated serial packages with a more accessible tool. Over the course of the next two years, the ERC collaborated with Matthew Harrington, a library technician at North Carolina State University, to create a Microsoft Access database capable of presenting title-level analyses, collection-level graphs, and institutional-level comparisons in addition to the higher-level summary statistics stemming from its original purpose. The database incorporates built-in functions to look for data integrity issues, reconcile title lists, and calculate what the package might look like with a different title set. This presentation focuses on the design and construction of this database tool in the context of its original intention, namely to show value. Therefore, rather than presenting an analysis of the data, I intend to demonstrate what can be done to transform data into information that displays value. 相似文献