首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
We explore how an incumbent firm's internal knowledge and organization structure influences its strategic alliance formation. We propose that the firm's knowledge breadth and the centrality of its R&D organization structure positively influence its absorptive capacity, and consequently, its propensity to form strategic alliances. We also argue that the centrality of the R&D organization structure may be a substitute for the breadth of the knowledge base. We validate our ideas using data on 2647 strategic alliances formed over the period of 1993-2002 by 43 major biopharmaceutical firms in the U.S. and Europe. Our discussion focuses on the application of the knowledge-based view of the firm to strategic alliance research. The implications for public policy in the biopharmaceutical industry are also emphasized.  相似文献   

2.
Fewer than 50% of strategic alliances are successful [Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11, 77–101]. This study examines the role of task complexity, nationality, prior alliance experience, and disparity in alliance experience in strategic alliance termination and performance. Based on survey responses from 85 parties in biopharmaceutical alliances, it is found that strategic alliances are more likely to be terminated and have poor performance when they have (1) both R&D and marketing elements, (2) domestic partners, (3) limited prior strategic alliance experience, and (4) large strategic alliance experience disparity between partners. Some of the findings are new and deserve additional investigations.  相似文献   

3.
战略联盟伙伴选择、竞合关系与联盟绩效研究   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
20世纪80年代以来,伴随着联盟快速发展的是战略联盟的高失败率,高达50%~70%。导致联盟失败的原因有很多,但目前文献中缺乏全面系统的研究。在研究中运用了资源基础理论和竞争合作理论现有的成果,通过分析联盟伙伴的匹配性兼顾联盟伙伴自身特点和关系特点,通过对联盟伙伴选择、联盟竞合关系和联盟绩效的关系进行分析,建立了联盟伙伴匹配性、竞合关系和绩效模型,旨在为未来的研究和管理实践提供借鉴。  相似文献   

4.
Access to knowledge is increasingly the driver underpinning the globalization of research. In emerging industries, such access is often managed through alliance structures between small entrepreneurial organizations. The literature on international alliances, however, is dominated by studies of “Triad” nation partners (United States, Europe and Japan) which are often larger firms, collaborating for market access motives and usually with established technologies. In addition, prior research has concentrated on particular aspects, such as motives for, and initial circumstances of, alliance formation. Analyses of the dynamic aspects in the relationship between alliance partners are more scarce. This article describes a study of an international research alliance in which the technology is in the superconductivity industry (which itself is not conforming to traditional notions of an emergent technology), one partner is from a non-Triad nation and the primary motive for formation was access to knowledge. We argue that this study has revealed gaps in current alliance research and hypothesize how some more socially based and process-related considerations could enhance the debate on knowledge-seeking alliances.  相似文献   

5.
Accelerating innovation in clean energy technologies is a policy priority for governments around the world aiming to mitigate climate change and to provide affordable energy. Most research has focused on the role of governments financing R&D and steering market demand, but there is a more limited understanding of the role of direct government interactions with startups across all sectors. We propose and evaluate the value-creation mechanisms of network resources from different types of partners for startups, highlighting the unique resources of government partners for cleantech startups. We develop and analyze a novel dataset of 657 U.S. cleantech startups and 2,015 alliances with governments, firms, research organizations, and not-for-profit organizations from 2008 to 2012 and analyze short-term firm outcomes from the different alliances. Our findings highlight the importance of governmental partners in technology development alliances to catalyze cleantech startup innovation (the patenting activity of cleantech startups increases by 73.7 percent with every additional governmental technology alliance when compared to those startups that did not engage in such alliances) and as quality signals to private sector investors for licensing alliances (private financing deals increase by 155 percent for every additional license from a government organization). Overall, these findings extend the alliance perspectives on innovation, contribute to the emerging research on entrepreneurial ecosystems, and underline the need to develop empirical evidence in different sectors.  相似文献   

6.
The evolution of trust in information technology alliances   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
As strategic alliances become an increasingly important weapon for companies in achieving a competitive advantage, an important subject of investigation has become those factors that contribute to the success of the alliance. Trust between the alliance partners has been proposed to be one of those critical success factors. The high levels of uncertainty and interdependence that characterizes high technology alliances make trust particularly important in these contexts. Very little is known, however, about the process of trust creation or erosion in strategic alliances. This study addresses this shortcoming in cross-sectional trust research by utilizing a longitudinal survey design to examine the antecedents and outcomes of trust formation between strategic alliance partners. We contrast a transaction cost economics view of trust with a social exchange perspective to more fully explore what may influence changes in the level of trust between partners. Results suggest that the development of trust was not a function of the formal incentive systems that transaction cost economists deem necessary to prevent opportunistic behavior. Conversely, factors from social exchange theory – communication, shared values, and relationship equity – provide a more thorough explanation of what contributes to the development of higher levels of organizational trust. Finally, this study provides evidence that as trust increases between partners, the alliance benefits by displaying higher levels of dependence, higher levels of partner learning, and higher levels of performance.  相似文献   

7.
自20世纪80年代以来,国际战略联盟不断增长并成为企业成长的新模式。在这种联盟背景下,中国企业与跨国公司缔结战略联盟仍然是我国企业成长的重要战略之一。然而,由于伙伴动机的冲突导致战略联盟的失败率极高,因此,选择合适的伙伴是联盟成功的关键。通过构建联盟动机:资源——学习——企业成长框架,从中国企业的角度分析战略联盟伙伴选择的标准。  相似文献   

8.
张运生  赖流滨 《科研管理》2022,43(9):149-158
    专利联盟能否帮助联盟成员防范联盟伙伴专利诉讼?基于联盟学习、合作竞争和社会网络理论,着眼于专利联盟网络,以2006—2018年MPEGLA管理的12个专利联盟成员为样本,通过14 454组配对,采用负二项回归模型实证研究专利联盟对遭受联盟伙伴专利诉讼的影响机制,并分析探索式合作、竞争性学习、网络中心位置和技术相似性的调节作用。研究发现:专利联盟与遭受联盟伙伴专利诉讼强度呈正向关系,探索式合作、竞争性学习和网络中心位置显著削弱专利联盟与专利诉讼的关系,而技术相似性显著强化专利联盟与专利诉讼的关系。本文拓展了专利联盟对联盟伙伴互动的影响路径,对于高技术企业有效利用专利联盟并防范联盟伙伴专利诉讼具有现实指导意义。  相似文献   

9.
Luis Diestre 《Research Policy》2018,47(10):1904-1917
This study examines how R&D alliance governance affects both the probability and magnitude of negative spillovers triggered by a partner’s safety crisis. I show that hierarchical governance leads to a lower probability that a partner will suffer a crisis and thus trigger a negative spillover, yet this governance mode leads to negative spillovers of greater magnitude should they happen. Because expected spillover costs are calculated as the probability of occurrence times the magnitude of such costs, it is not clear which governance mode best minimizes expected spillover costs. I combine transaction costs economics and signaling theory to develop a contingency model that identifies which effect is more likely to dominate, as a way to address the reported dilemma. I found evidence in support of the described dilemma and the contingency model in a sample of 296 R&D outsourcing alliances in the biopharmaceutical industry.  相似文献   

10.
技术获取作为众多企业选择建立战略联盟的重要原因,促进了企业创新绩效的提升。然而,技术获取的联盟动机对企业创新产出的影响却是一个极为复杂的作用过程。本文以已有研究为基础,引入专利策略构建"技术获取-专利策略选择-创新绩效"的分析框架,考察技术获取的联盟动机如何借助专利策略选择作用于企业创新绩效。选取信息技术产业的联盟企业作为样本,通过实证研究发现:技术获取动机会引致企业专利策略组合的运用,实现了技术获取向创新绩效的转化;技术获取引致的企业创新绩效因联盟意图及策略组合而存在差异,以市场进入为目标的情形下,企业创新效率和专利产出趋于增加;以市场拓展为诉求的联盟企业市值得到强化。  相似文献   

11.
R&V非竞争联盟是战略联盟的一种创新模式,在联盟组建中,合作伙伴的选择成为实现联盟资源整合成功与否的关键问题。为减少因伙伴选择而引发的联盟失败率,基于波尔的试错思想对R&V非竞争性联盟合作伙伴的选择进行分析;同时,构建联盟伙伴选择的试错模型,并通过伙伴选择的价值判断计算式对伙伴进行选择;最后以阿迪达斯公司与腾讯公司的合作案例作为引证。  相似文献   

12.
首先,对产业技术创新战略联盟运行效率的概念进行界定,分析与其他联盟的区别,构建基于主导者类型的联盟运行模式;其次,从提升科技创新视角构建联盟运行效率评价指标体系;然后,利用两阶段关联DEA法对云南省23家产业技术创新战略联盟进行运行效率比较分析,构建基于技术研发和成果转化的两阶段效率矩阵图;最后,对不同运行模式下联盟的运行效率进行分析,总结不同运行模式下联盟的适用条件,并提出有针对性的对策建议。  相似文献   

13.
Xu Jiang  Yuan Li 《Research Policy》2009,38(2):358-368
This paper examines firm-level performance implications of strategic alliances by employing knowledge management practices as intermediaries. Unlike previous research which focuses on partner firm factors, this study investigates how alliance characteristics (i.e., alliance scope and governance) affect interfirm knowledge sharing and creation, and how these two practices and their interaction in turn affect innovative performance. These questions are examined in a sample of 127 German partnering firms. Results show that joint ventures as opposed to contractual alliances are more effective and influential in facilitating knowledge sharing and creation. In contrast, the scope of alliance activities, while positively associated with knowledge sharing, has no direct relationship with knowledge creation. In addition to these results, the study also finds that knowledge sharing, knowledge creation and their interaction significantly contribute to partner firms’ innovative performance.  相似文献   

14.
杨震宁  吴晨 《科研管理》2021,42(5):21-30
技术战略联盟是合作伙伴资源共享、提高技术创新效率和共同创造价值的组织,但其创新活动往往伴随着各类风险,在实践中很多联盟的运行没有达到预期效果。如何降低联盟的运行风险,优化合作路径既是理论的前沿问题,也是实践亟待解决的难题。本文研究了技术战略联盟运行风险、协同合作与联盟稳定的关系,通过实证研究,结果表明:第一,技术战略联盟运行过程中利益冲突风险和分歧冲突风险会降低联盟的稳定性,而联盟依赖风险初期会提高联盟绩效,但随着依赖程度的逐渐加深,参与各方的自主开拓创新能力有可能受损,从而降低联盟绩效;第二,联盟内部的自主合作可以正向调节技术战略联盟运行中利益冲突风险、分歧冲突风险与联盟绩效的关系,并且削弱联盟依赖风险对联盟绩效的倒U型效应,从而起到协同优化的作用。政府扶持对技术战略联盟运行风险与联盟稳定关系的调节作用并不明显。  相似文献   

15.
《Research Policy》2019,48(8):103766
Organizations build strategic alliances with other firms with the intent of tapping into partners’ resources and capturing long-term value from these relationships. Such partnerships are typically governed by contractual or equity arrangements with clear mutual obligations. More recently, however, organizations have begun to seek strategic partnerships with open innovation communities, which are novel digitally enabled forms of organizing, and where contractual commitments are not possible. Thus, selecting the right open innovation community as an alliance partner becomes a more complex decision. We follow how the organizational decision makers, in two technology firms that were pioneers of forming strategic alliances with open innovation communities, developed metrics around making such decisions. We build upon Shah and Swaminathan’s (2008) contingency model of alliance partner selection and consider how it applies to the case of partnering with open innovation communities. This framework was useful in to frame our findings, yet our work recognizes and builds upon two key differences: 1) the evaluation metrics used in selecting an open innovation community were more focused on value creation than value capture; and 2) open ecosystem considerations, and not just partner-specific metrics, featured prominently in this type of alliance partner evaluation. We develop the notions of community and ecosystem health to refer to these new metrics.  相似文献   

16.
We draw upon evolutionary economics and transaction cost economics to examine how alliance experience accumulation at the parent firm level and alliance features at the transaction level jointly and interactively shape the favorability of research alliances’ termination outcomes. Fifteen percent of the terminated alliances we examined were successful, 34% were failures, and 51% experienced an intermediate outcome in the form of contract expiration or unilateral withdrawal by a partner. We find that the effect of partner-specific experience on the favorability of termination outcomes is greater for non-equity alliances than for equity structures affording stronger formal governance mechanisms. Other forms of experience such as general alliance experience or prior alliances in the same technological area as the focal agreement have no such favorable consequences for alliance termination. The findings also indicate that alliance complexity adversely influences firms’ termination outcomes in alliances. We therefore find evidence in partial support of both evolutionary and transaction cost based arguments for the explanation of termination outcomes in research alliances.  相似文献   

17.
基于浙江省450家企业调查问卷的实证研究表明,企业标准联盟战略动机主要包括降低市场的不确定性、知识的获取、市场准入和与政府政策的一致性;企业RD强度、市场创新、公司规模、国际贸易、是否设置独立标准化组织以及竞争环境影响着企业标准联盟的战略动机。研究结果对技术标准联盟以及标准实施效益具有一定的指导意义。  相似文献   

18.
龙勇  李薇 《科研管理》2008,29(4):76-81
合作R&D是竞争对手间组建战略联盟的重要动机之一,因此对研发活动的效率进行测量与评价是分析此类联盟的重要内容,而评价方法的设计与选择也是研究的重点和难点。本文尝试将数据包络分析(DEA)方法引入到竞争性战略联盟的效率评价领域,应用多时段生产效率变化指数模型,分析了医药产业中竞争性联盟对R&D效率的影响,并评价了当前竞争性联盟中研发活动的效率水平。研究表明,与竞争对手合作开展R&D能够在较大程度上提高组织的总体研发效率,促进产业技术水平升级。本文研究结果对企业如何提升技术创新能力具有启发意义。  相似文献   

19.
Asymmetric alliances, those between small technology ventures and large industry players, defy established wisdom regarding the positive relationship between alliance partner similarities and alliance performance. What can we learn from these increasingly prevalent alliance forms to inform and extend alliance theory and practice? To help answer this question, this paper reports on the qualitative study of three asymmetric alliances, one failure and two successes, identifies key conceptual differences between symmetric and asymmetric alliances not addressed in the literature to date, suggests research opportunities and makes recommendations on how technology entrepreneurs can manage their relationship with large partners.  相似文献   

20.
战略联盟构建的风险感知分析   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
本文应用风险感知原理,分析了战略联盟构建的具体过程。对这一过程中的重要环节,如联盟企业感知风险的形成、联盟企业感知风险与其结构偏好的关系、联盟企业感知风险与联盟结构的匹配、联盟企业之间不同结构偏好的统一等都作了详尽的分析,从而从原理上阐释了不同联盟状况下不同联盟企业确定战略联盟结构的过程。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号