共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
This study investigates how business research scholars’ internationalization strategies influence their research performance and how this relationship is moderated by the availability of different knowledge-based resources. The authors analyze citations to journal articles authored by business research scholars with German affiliations and examine how the number of citations is determined by international collaborations and a researcher's knowledge resources in terms of language skills, research experience, and foreign market knowledge. The results demonstrate that the augmentation of complementary knowledge resources (i.e., when researchers lack language skills and foreign market knowledge) positively influences the performance of a collaboration-based internationalization strategy (i.e., collaborations with international researchers). The collaboration-based strategy also improves performance for less experienced researchers, but this advantage diminishes with increasing research experience. The findings provide further insights into drivers of scholars’ research performance and have practical implications for science policy. 相似文献
2.
The impact of research work is related to a scholar's reputation and future promotions. Greater research impact not only inspires scholars to continue their research, but also increases the possibility of a larger research budget from sponsors. Given the importance of research impact, this study proposes that utilizing social capital embedded in a social structure is an effective way to achieve more research impact. The contribution of this study is to define six indicators of social capital (degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, prolific co-author count, team exploration, and publishing tenure) and investigate how these indicators interact and affect citations for publications. A total of 137 Information Systems scholars from the Social Science Citation Index database were selected to test the hypothesized relationships. The results show that betweenness centrality plays the most important role in taking advantage of non-redundant resources in a co-authorship network, thereby significantly affecting citations for publications. In addition, we found that prolific co-author count, team exploration, and publishing tenure all have indirect effects on citation count. Specifically, co-authoring with prolific scholars helps researchers develop centralities and, in turn, generate higher numbers of citations. Researchers with longer publishing tenure tend to have higher degree centrality. When they collaborate more with different scholars, they achieve more closeness and betweenness centralities, but risk being distrusted by prolific scholars and losing chances to co-author with them. Finally, implications of findings and recommendations for future research are discussed. 相似文献
3.
New indicators for gender studies in Web networks 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：2
New indicators for gender studies are introduced using the multi-authored publications of a set of 64 members of the COLLNET network. Considering the sample of 223 papers and their visibility on the Web, analyses were performed on the sets comprised of publications on the one hand and the authors (social network analysis) on the other.The indicators developed include: Gender co-operation; Web visibility rates and Gender centrality in networks.The co-operation among COLLNET members results in a publication set with a different pattern to other gender studies in science, which show low contribution rates of women in collaboration activities. In the sample the collaboration patterns of female COLLNET members are almost the same as their male counterparts. However, when considering only the arrangement of gender in the by-line of publications, this is in favour of men.Regarding average Web visibility rates, there are no differences dependent upon the arrangement of gender in publications with both male and female co-authors. However, the results also show strong gender differences in favour of publications with only male co-authors.The centrality of female actors in the networks is correlated with the central positions of women in the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), where they are leading either as presidents or organisers of its international conferences.It may well be that, with webometric methods and new indicators for gender studies, there is a real continuation of gender equality in COLLNET over time. 相似文献
4.
5.
国际科学合作个体中心网的中印比较 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
郭永正 《科学学与科学技术管理》2008,29(8)
采用美国<科学引文索引-扩展版>(SCI-E)1977-2006年收录的中国大陆的国际合著期刊论文114 717篇和印度的国际合著期刊论文52 790篇,统计了论文作者所属国家(地区)间的合作关系,得知中国有174个国际合著伙伴,印度有181个国际合著伙伴.比较了中、印两国国际科学合作的个体中心网结构,发现两国国际科学合作个体中心网具有基本相同的网络密度、中心势以及核心合作伙伴和明显不同的链密度,表明中国国际科学合作的集中性.在两国的核心合作伙伴中,亚洲伙伴在中国网中的重要性大于在印度网中的重要性,美洲伙伴在中国网中的重要性小于在印度网中的重要性.从地理区域来看,亚洲、欧洲、美洲对中国和印度国际科学合作的重要性基本相同,大洋洲在中国国际科学合作个体中心网的重要性大于在印度国际科学合作个体中心网的重要性,非洲在中国国际科学合作个体中心网的重要性小于在印度国际科学合作个体中心网的重要性. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
本文通过社会网络分析方法,针对图情机构内部学者合著网络从中心性分析、凝聚子群分析和可视化分析3个角度,以武汉大学信息管理学院为例进行实证研究。根据实证结果,找出学院内部核心作者、合著网络子群并对图情机构内部学者合著网络特性进行了概括分析。 相似文献
9.
旨在揭示大数据研究中国家和机构间的合作模式和网络结构,发现主要参与国家和机构的主导地位,并利用科学地图来可视化这些合作特征.在了解大数据领域全球论文产出概况的基础上,应用网络特征指标分析大数据研究合作网络的结构特征及演化规律、主要国家与机构在合作网络中的地位及其作用,并通过VOSviewer软件以科学叠加图(overlay map)的形式对结果进行可视化.研究发现:全球大数据研究以国内合作尤其是机构内合作为主,国家和机构间合作的比重较低,随着时间推移,国际合作网络规模不断扩大,并逐渐向多元主导模式转变;中国、美国和英国在国际合作网络中占据核心地位、发挥桥梁作用;中国作者在国际合作网络中的主导性较高,中国科学院、德克萨斯大学和清华大学是最为活跃的参与机构. 相似文献
10.
在科研项目管理过程中,项目负责人和其他成员组成了合作网络。本文检验了科研项目负责人网络位置对项目创新的影响,并分析了当合作网络的创新能力处于行业不同水平时,该影响是否存在差异。利用国家自然科学基金结题数据,结果表明,科研项目负责人的网络中心度对项目创新有正向影响,结构洞数对项目创新有倒U型影响。相比较合作网络创新能力处于行业高水平,当其处于中、低水平时,项目负责人网络位置对项目创新的影响更大。本研究结论不仅完善了网络位置对创新影响的相关文献,验证了我国提出项目负责人制进行项目管理的正确性,也对项目负责人制定管理方案有一定的指导意义。 相似文献
11.
12.
收集中国管理学领域8种期刊1994—2007年的论文数据,构建中国管理学者论文合作网络,从学者合作与否与论文质量的关系、学者间不同合作模式对论文质量的影响、基金支持对论文质量的影响、学者个人网络属性与其绩效的关系等方面探讨中国管理学者合作网络属性与合作绩效的关系.研究发现,中国管理学者合著论文质量高于独著论文;跨校合作比政企合作和校企合作、跨省合作比跨国合作对论文质量提高有更大的促进作用,管理科学学者跨院系合作论文比工商管理学者跨院系合作论文质量好;有基金支持比没有基金支持的论文质量好;管理学者个人的点度中心度、中间中心度与其个人产出和影响力正相关,接近中心度与之负相关,3种中心度均与论文质量无显著关系. 相似文献
13.
In this article we employ a number of bibliometric techniques to capture Rob Kling's intellectual impact and influences over the course of his varied career. We analyze his many publications in terms of type, topic, impact, and rate of co-authorship. We provide a detailed deconstruction of his citation identity (all those scholars whom he cited) and also his citation image makers (all those scholars who cited his work). In addition, we analyze acknowledgment data to gain deeper insights into the sociocognitive networks that sustained, and were sustained by Kling throughout his career. 相似文献
14.
辨识科学家合作网络的局部结构可以增进对科学家合作行为的理解。基于复杂网络子图搜索和社会网络结构对等性,提出基于子图结构对等的科学家合作网络角色辨识方法,并应用于复杂网络领域科学家合作网络角色分析中。研究界定了六种4节点子图的11种点位,讨论了复杂网络领域科学家合作网络点位特征,并依据科学合作特性将11种点位分为核心、中介和边缘三类角色;分析发现科学家角色种类的多样性,且其种类数与度、介数和接近性等中心性指标呈正相关关系;基于角色相对数量分布将度排名前20位的顶尖科学家分为两个子群体。研究提供了社会合作网络个体行动者角色辨识的定量方法。 相似文献
15.
As globalization has expedited mobility of faculty across nations, faculty hiring is taking place at an international level. Institutions and governments often perceive hiring faculty who were trained in different countries as a strategy for reaching the status of world-class universities. The major assumption behind this hiring strategy is that faculty who are educated in prestigious universities in foreign countries will bring cutting edge knowledge and networks that will lead to future research collaborations. Yet, a dearth of research empirically investigated the assumption that institutions that train future foreign faculty and those that hire faculty with foreign degrees will have greater presence in the international networks of research collaboration. Filling this hole, this study examines this assumption from an international perspective, using the case of industrial engineering departments at selective research universities in Chile and Korea. Based on the unique data that document faculty hiring (degree attainment institutions) and research collaboration (co-authorship), and institutional prestige (global ranking positions), we analyzed the relationship between faculty hiring network and research collaboration network, as well as their association with institutional prestige. The results provide strong evidence of the positive relationships between doctoral training and future research collaboration, and the strong presence of institutions with global prestige. These relationships result in homophilic networks that suggest a concern about a reduced diversity in theoretical perspective and research methods within the disciplinary field. 相似文献
16.
Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
This study examines the longitudinal trend of systemness in networked research relations in South Korea using a triple helix (TH) indicator of university-industry-government (UIG) relations. The data were harvested from the Science Citation Index (SCI) and its counterparts in the social sciences (SSCI) and the arts and humanities (A&HCI). The total number of Korean SCI publications has grown rapidly since 1965. However, the TH indicator shows that the network dynamics have varied considerably according to the research policies of the national government. The collaboration patterns, as measured by co-authorship relations in the SCI noticeably increased, with some variation, from the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s. However, inter-institutional collaboration in the first decade of the 21st century was negatively influenced by the new national science and technology (S&T) research policies that evaluated domestic scientists and research groups based on their international publication numbers rather than on the level of cooperation among academic, private, and public domains. The results reveal that Korea has failed to boost its national research capacity by neglecting the network effects in science, technology, and industry. 相似文献
17.
科学合著网络研究进展分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
分析目前合著网络研究的缺陷,介绍社会网络分析法的小团体分析、中心性分析以及角色分析和复杂网络的小世界性、无标度性在合著网络中的应用前景,以及国内外的研究现状,为合著网络的研究提供借鉴。 相似文献
18.
Knowledge production and scientific research have become increasingly more collaborative and international, particularly in pharmaceuticals. We analyze this tendency in general and tie formation in international research networks on the country level in particular. Based on a unique dataset of scientific publications related to pharmaceutical research and applying social network analysis, we find that both the number of countries and their connectivity increase in almost all disease group specific networks. The cores of the networks consist of high income OECD countries and remain rather stable over time. Using network regression techniques to analyze the network dynamics our results indicate that accumulative advantages based on connectedness and multi-connectivity are positively related to changes in the countries’ collaboration intensity whereas various indicators on similarity between countries do not allow for unambiguous conclusions. 相似文献
19.
In this article we employ a number of bibliometric techniques to capture Rob Kling's intellectual impact and influences over the course of his varied career. We analyze his many publications in terms of type, topic, impact, and rate of co-authorship. We provide a detailed deconstruction of his citation identity (all those scholars whom he cited) and also his citation image makers (all those scholars who cited his work). In addition, we analyze acknowledgment data to gain deeper insights into the sociocognitive networks that sustained, and were sustained by Kling throughout his career. 相似文献
20.
International research collaboration (IRC) has been increasingly important as an emerging area of innovation studies. This study reviews the intellectual base, main research trajectories and intellectual communities of the IRC research domain over the period 1957–2015. It integrates qualitative review and three quantitative analyses including co-citation network analysis, main path analysis and bibliographic coupling analysis. The results show that the IRC research has gone through three phases, namely, “emergence” (1957–1991), “fermentation” (1992–2005) and “take-off” (2006–2015) phases. The co-citation network analysis confirms that the IRC research field has been developed under the influence of two pioneering studies related to bibliometrics research. The main research trajectories in IRC studies over the three development phases and over the whole period are identified based on the main path analysis, which shows that co-authorship analysis is the main research method in IRC studies. A bibliographic coupling analysis suggests that the whole IRC research domain can be classified into five distinct intellectual areas: drivers of IRC, IRC patterns, IRC effects, IRC networks and IRC measurement. Seven topics for future research are also identified. 相似文献