共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 468 毫秒
1.
国外绿色教育简述:思想与实践 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着我国教育界对绿色教育关注的日益升温,世界其他国家和地区的有关教育理念和实践可以为我们提供借鉴.国际上与我国绿色教育概念最接近的概念是环境教育以及稍后延伸出的可持续发展教育.经过近几十年来各国教育者和一些国际组织的不断探讨和推动,环境教育(以及后来的可持续发展教育)已经具备了相当程度的理论与实践基础,我们有必要在这个基础上不断推进我国绿色教育的理论与实践探索.总的看来,目前国际上的环境教育和可持续发展教育呈现出四大特征:一是各方普遍将教育视为环境保护的重要方面;二是在学校中注重环境教育的综合性和跨学科性;三是关注教师教育对于环境教育的重要作用;四是将关注重心从人与环境之间的关系延伸至自然和人类社会各个方面的全面协调和可持续发展. 相似文献
2.
3.
徐敬标 《课程.教材.教法》2013,(1):72-76
可持续发展教育是在环境教育和发展教育的基础上,伴随可持续发展战略的提出而产生的。小学科学教育与可持续发展教育不仅有密切联系,而且具备很多渗透的优势。在分析可持续发展教育实施过程中存在的问题基础上,提出要挖掘《课标》隐含的信息,认识可持续发展教育的理念;把握教学环节,寻求可持续发展教育内容的渗透点;结合课外活动,开展可持续发展教育主题活动;注重日常生活规范,养成可持续发展教育的良好行为;开展多元评价,突出可持续发展教育的价值。 相似文献
4.
从环境教育“为了环境”的目标到“为了发展”的可持续发展教育目标,反映了可持续发展目标的基本历程。学者们在多处对可持续发展教育目标有所涉及,但均未系统探讨。可持续发展教育目标作为普通教育目标的具体化内容,可以从多个角度揭示其内涵的丰富性、复杂性,即从内容层次结构看,可持续发展教育目标包含可持续发展的意识与知识、态度与价值观、情感与体验、技能获得和过程参与;从关系维度结构看,可持续发展教育目标包括了可持续发展的人际关系、学科关系、理论和实践关系;从学理内容结构看,可持续发展教育目标则可包括可持续发展的方向目标、内容目标、方法目标、课程目标和环境;从对象层次结构看,可持续发展教育目标可包括基础教育、中高等教育和社会教育。这些可持续发展教育目标结构的丰富性、复杂性奠定了它的发展性、整体性、主体性和实践性特征。 相似文献
5.
作为人类赖以生存与发展的基础 ,地球环境长期没能受到人类应有的尊重与爱护 ,导致当前人类面临的环境危机。而危机的解决 ,需要人类对现行生产与生活方式全面地反思并进行根本性地改变。教育作为转变思想的工具 ,其作用无可替代。环境教育被看好能承担这样的任务促进这种转变 ,但 30年来的环境教育却被认为是场失败的革新。是现代教育助长了当今的环境问题 ,成为不可持续发展的“贡献者”。在我们目前的状况下 ,可持续发展教育可能是回到那些内在自由、进步的价值观的惟一途径 ,这些价值观曾经是我们教育系统的基础。可持续发展教育是将要改变的教育模式的关键 ,这种教育模式和社会经济组织变化与可持续发展暗含的思想是相和谐的。主流教育观点认为 ,可持续发展教育深深地根植于环境教育之中。目前可持续发展教育的理论和实践都还未完善 ,尚处在探索阶段。在我国新一轮基础教育课程改革中 ,环境教育正在和当前的整体教育改革结合起来 ,推动我国教育的生态化或绿色化 ,使教育成为促进和支持我国可持续发展的基本力量 相似文献
6.
地理教育与可持续发展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
进入新世纪,人类社会依靠科学技术取得了前所未有的发展。与此同时,环境不断恶化,资源日益匮乏。如何协调人与环境的关系,成为全球面临的严峻问题,环境问题也成为全世界关注的焦点。同样,这也是制约我国经济可持续发展的重要因素。《中国21世纪议程》制订了我国国民经济和社会发展的远景规划,提出了实施可持续发展的战略。地理作为一门专门研究人类社会与地理环境关系的学科,必然在可持续发展教育中承担重要任务。提高人们的环境意识、可持续发展意识,是地理教育的目的。一、地理教育与可持续发展意识和观念的培养培养人的可持续发展意识和… 相似文献
7.
可持续发展教育的理论研究与实践探索 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
国际可持续发展教育是在可持续发展运动中成长起来的。我国的可持续发展教育是从环境教育中逐步演化而来的。从总体上看,中国可持续发展教育实践与理论研究处于起步发展阶段,存在若干薄弱环节。中国特色的可持续发展教育的基本理论包括主体教育理论、可持续发展教育理论。推进中国特色的可持续发展教育的主要途径有:广泛宣传可持续发展的知识,开展教育教学模式的创新,开展多种形式的教师培训,关注公民环境教育和健康教育。 相似文献
8.
面向可持续发展:环境教育新理念 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
60年代后,面对环境问题的日益恶化,以培养正确的环境价值观为目的的环境教育从无到有,并得到了迅速发展,成为国际教育中的一个重要领域。进入90年代后,随着人们对环境与发展关系问题的关注,环境教育理念出现了新的取向,即环境教育要面向可持续发展,全面培养受教育者的环境与发展的价值观,从而使未来公民以较高环境素质走向21世纪,为全球可持续发展战略的实施作出贡献。 相似文献
9.
潘淑敏 《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》1997,(2)
可持续发展(Sustainable Development)是当今国际社会广泛接受和认同的新概念,也是世界各国共同追求的目标和发展模式。它既是一种新的思想,更是一种新的发展战略和模式。本文介绍了可持续发展概念产生的背景及其含义,阐述了教育与可持续发展之间的关系以及教育包括环境教育对实现可持续发展战略所起的重要作用。 相似文献
10.
环境教育是我国可持续发展的前提,强化环境教育,加快国民环境意识的形成能够有效增强我国可持续发展的能力。重新认识人与自然的关系,认识面临的环境问题,提高保护环境的自觉性,对推动我国可持续发展战略的贯彻和落实具有重要意义。 相似文献
11.
Margarita Pavlova 《Environmental Education Research》2013,19(5):656-672
The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) charges educators with a key role in developing and ‘securing sustainable life chances, aspirations and futures for young people’. Environmental Education (EE) and ESD share a vision of quality education and a society that lives in balance with Earth’s carrying capacity, even as they differ in terms of expectations of how that vision is realized, and what might need to be balanced. Rather than treat EE and ESD as sparing partners or fellow travellers towards the same destination, this paper analyses EE and ESD from the perspective of transformative educational goals. Using these goals as a benchmark transcends immediate problems with either form of education, while also helps to clarify policies and practise formations, appropriate to a diversity of educational contexts. 相似文献
12.
Thomas J. Marcinkowski 《The Journal of environmental education》2013,44(1):34-54
Over the past four decades, numerous professionals in the field of environmental education (EE) have attempted to take stock of conditions within and outside of EE. In turn, many used the results of their analyses to describe challenges to and opportunities for EE. Many of these challenges and opportunities continue to ring true today, although the purpose of this article is not to explore those, but to explore several contemporary challenges and opportunities. The first challenge posed is to continue to expand and make use of the range of professional development opportunities within the field, such as is apparent in several of NAAEE's sets of Guidelines and related initiatives, particularly as the field continues to grow in numbers and in different directions. A second challenge pertains to the need for increased attention to sustainability in developed and developing nations' contexts, the rapid growth of “Education for Sustainability” (ESD) since UNCED, and the need to maintain clarity over the complex and dynamic relationships between EE and ESD with respect to sustainable development needs. A third challenge pertains to climate change as the most recent “environmental crisis” and set of problems we face, as evidence continues to mount. However, climate change represents a different kind of challenge, and underscores the challenge of preparing citizens to participate in problem-solving and in envisioning desirable futures through EE. In addressing these challenges and opportunities, we must continue to seek out and affirm the best of what is traditional and innovative, as well as effective and adaptive, within the field. 相似文献
13.
Education for sustainable development (ESD): the turn away from ‘environment’ in environmental education? 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Helen Kopnina 《Environmental Education Research》2012,18(5):699-717
This article explores the implications of the shift of environmental education (EE) towards education for sustainable development (ESD) in the context of environmental ethics. While plural perspectives on ESD are encouraged both by practitioners and researchers of EE, there is also a danger that such pluralism may sustain dominant political ideologies and consolidated corporate power that obscure environmental concerns. Encouraging plural interpretations of ESD may in fact lead ecologically ill-informed teachers and students acculturated by the dominant neo-liberal ideology to underprivilege ecocentric perspective. It is argued that ESD, with its focus on human welfare, equality, rights and fair distribution of resources is a radical departure from the aim of EE set out by the Belgrade Charter as well as a distinct turn towards anthropocentrically biased education. This article has two aims: to demonstrate the importance of environmental ethics for EE in general and ESD in particular and to argue in favour of a return to instrumentalism, based on the twinned assumptions that the environmental problems are severe and that education of ecologically minded students could help their resolution. 相似文献
14.
This article examines the historical development of environmental education (EE) in Indonesia with emphasis on the non-formal sector, and applies its findings to the discussion on education for sustainable development (ESD), which seldom draws on case studies from developing countries. Local socio-economic and political conditions have made EE in Indonesia similar to ‘ESD’ in terms of its topical scope involving various social issues, although whether it should be referred to as ESD remains unclear. In contrast to the existing concerns about ESD, it involves critical views on the prevailing models of (neo-liberal) economic development. This article also shows that EE, like ESD, is at risk of exploitation by vested interests. 相似文献
15.
Per Sund 《Environmental Education Research》2015,21(1):24-44
In educational settings, sustainable development (SD) is often handled with the aim of reducing the contested aspects of the concept. Issues like trade, conservation, public health and international relations are often presented in a simplified way so that they are easier for students to grasp. However, in education, this tendency to simplify sustainability issues can be a disadvantage. This study explores how Swedish upper secondary school teachers’ education for sustainable development (ESD) in award-winning ‘ESD-schools’ supports students to become informed and autonomous democratic citizens by appreciating the complexity of the concept of SD. This empirical study is part of a larger research project studying progressive upper secondary schools and is a development of earlier research on teachers’ starting points for long-term purposes beyond the teaching – which we have termed objects of responsibility. In interviews of five teachers from two schools, experienced in ESD issues and working in teacher teams, an interesting commonality in their arguments for teaching sustainability emerged during the analytical process. The implications of the study’s results are important for EE/ESD research into teaching continuity as well as for teachers in practice. 相似文献
16.
Mimoza Hyseni Spahiu Bardha Korca Petra Lindemann-Matthies 《International Journal of Science Education》2013,35(16):2750-2771
The integration of education for sustainable development (ESD) into all levels of education is a key priority in Kosovo's environmental action plan. However, at present it is not even known how environmental education (EE) is integrated in the country's educational system. With the help of a written questionnaire and in-depth interviews with 18 teachers, this study investigated the integration of EE in high schools (optional upper secondary education) in Kosovo. The representative sample of biology, geography, chemistry, and civic education teachers (244 persons) focused on various kinds of pollution and hazards of pollutants. Teachers' choice of topics was highly relevant, place-based, and linked to the experiences of students, but excluded sustainability issues such as the loss of biodiversity. EE was approached in three ways. The first approach critically reflected links between the natural, social, and cultural environment, while the second approach was characterized by knowledge submission of environmental facts. The third approach aimed at capacity-building and, in the sense of ESD, understood learning as process-oriented, participatory, and action-oriented. However, this approach was rather uncommon, most likely due to insufficient teacher preparation, large classes (up to 50 students), and little time (just one hour per week for EE). Class size and time also restricted outdoor activities, in particular field work. Nevertheless, in view of the interviewees, ideal EE would mean outdoor education, field work and other place-based, capacity-building practical experiences, and the development of critical thinking skills. This exemplifies that approaches to ESD may find support from dedicated teachers in Kosovo. 相似文献
17.
Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) has been recently recognized as an important area in the new Chinese educational reform. As teachers play a pivotal role, knowing and developing an effective and easy-to-use instrument for tapping teachers’ beliefs is essential. This article reports an attempt to develop an instrument with mixed methods. The finalized instruments comprise two subscales with satisfactory reliability indices obtained. Sustainability values (VSD) consists of four dimensions: respect and care for the community of life; ecological integrity; social and economic justice; and democracy, nonviolence, and peace. Teaching beliefs of ESD (TESD) consists of three dimensions: relevance to daily life; students’ need in the future; and integrated teaching. With these validated instruments, future research and potential problems will be less strenuous. 相似文献
18.
This article addresses issues regarding implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) within formal education systems. In particular, it seeks to identify the basic essential components of ESD pedagogy. The authors present a theoretical pedagogical framework based on accumulated theory and experience in the field. The framework aspires to encompass the majority of prevailing pedagogies within a simple set of four basic principles. It will be argued that the four principal pedagogies are basic and indispensable prerequisites for achieving the goals of ESD, and the lack of one is sufficient to undermine the ESD's pedagogical construct. 相似文献
19.
Noah Weeth Feinstein Jeppe Læssøe Nicole Blum Dianne Chambers 《Environmental Education Research》2013,19(2):198-205
In 2009, a think tank called the International Alliance of Leading Education Institutes (IALEI) announced the results of a study entitled Climate Change and Sustainable Development: The Response from Education. Intended for a policy audience, the study offered a glimpse into the status of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and an early look at the emergence of Climate Change Education (CCE), in 10 different nations. As with most international reports, the IALEI report provoked many questions, some of which are more broadly relevant to scholarship and practice. This paper introduces a review symposium that addresses three such questions: (1) How coherent is the concept of ESD across national contexts and what conceptual tensions continue to surround ESD and CCE? (2) Can nation-level analyses tell us anything useful about countries where education is not centrally governed? and (3) In light of the evolving relationship between educational research and policy, how should researchers engage with ongoing policy debates? 相似文献
20.
Martin Haigh 《Compare》2008,38(4):427-440
The internationalisation of higher education aims to produce ‘citizens that feel at home in the world’ but the process is driven by both economic and educational motivations. Today, the international community aspires to promote Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and Education for Democratic Citizenship (EDC), together planetary citizenship, and with them emphases on personal and ethical responsibilities to the environment and future that contrast with current competitive individualism. Driven by rising numbers of international students, curricula are already shifting toward more global assessments of society and environment. However, progress is being impeded by management systems that take commerce as their model. While instructors strive to ensure that learners consider their responsibilities through ESD and EDC, their message is being contradicted by their context. Since learners learn from their total environment, not just in classrooms, changes are required. Granting greater attention to sustainability issues and the empowerment of learners and teachers would allow a better constructive alignment between educational and economic imperatives. 相似文献