首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 843 毫秒
1.
论述主要款目概念的演变及其在目录中的作用,指出《资源描述与检索》(RDA)以"代表作品的规范检索点"取代和拓宽了"主要款目"概念,为今后国内编目规则的统一提供了可能。  相似文献   

2.
《国际编目原则声明》中的FRBR/FRANAR模型   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
<国际编目原则声明>通过FRBR/FRANAR概念模型来体现新的书目工具在实现目录功能方面的特征与作用;根据FRBR/FRANAR模型确定了编目对象,依据FRBR的用户任务拓展了巴黎原则规定的目录功能,以FRBR/FRANAR提炼的实体属性及其相互关系来定义书目记录与规范记录的数据元素,划分必备与附加检索点.表2.参考文献5.  相似文献   

3.
《国际编目原则声明》中有关检索点与规范标目的论述是我们选取和确立团体名称检索点的基本依据。文章从《国际编目原则声明》的角度,对《普通图书著录规则》标目法、《中国文献编目规则》及其第二版中有关选取团体名称检索点以及确立规范标目的规则进行了对比、分析,对中文团体名称检索点的规范提出了自己的看法。  相似文献   

4.
试论机读目录标目的多面引向原则   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
于学华 《图书馆》1999,(5):48-50
提供多方面检索点以引向多途径检索的标目原则称为多面引向原则。它除了应保证从题名、责任者、主题、分类四个方面选取标目外,在同一类目中,也要提供尽可能多的检索点以引向多途径检索。机读目录丰富的检索字段为这种多途径检索提供了条件。正确掌握、充分利用这些字段,是计算机编目实践中的首要问题。  相似文献   

5.
根据机读目录丰富的检索字段可引向多途径检索的特点,提出了在计算机编目实践中更好地设置检索点、增加检索点的具体措施,从而实现机读目录的多元检索功能。  相似文献   

6.
论述《国际编目原则声明》在总原则、目录的功能、著录、检索点等方面的重要修改。  相似文献   

7.
"国际编目原则声明"研究   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
IFLA编目组为指导构建一部用于书目著录和检索的国际编目条例,提出了新的“国际编目原则声明”草案,俗称“法兰克福原则”,以取代“巴黎原则”。法兰克福原则基于“书目记录功能需求”,将目录功能扩展到发现、识别、选择、获取和导航,原则适用范围扩大到各类文献的书目与规范记录,同时增加检索点的规定,在检索点选择与形式上也有所变化。“法兰克福原则”将通过逐次修订,成为未来制订国际编目条例的基础。  相似文献   

8.
连接与检索是CNMARC编目中容易混淆的两个概念,认为做4-字段不等于做连接,题名检索点形式并不是制作题名检索点,连接既不同于检索,也不可能通过检索来实现。  相似文献   

9.
从国际编目原则看检索点语言   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
中外目录体系、语言文字和编目规则之间存在明显差异,检索点采用的语言文字,首先要适合读者需要,把读者的便利性放在第一位。  相似文献   

10.
规范机读目录的题名与责任者检索点   总被引:8,自引:1,他引:7  
针对《中国机读目录格式》中欠缺的检索点规范问题,通过对卡片目录和MARC两种目录体系不同原理与方式的分析、比较,提出规范MARC文献题名与责任者检索点的基本原则,并提出规范这两类检索点的具体措施。  相似文献   

11.
ABSTRACT

In the ten years since the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, long-standing debates have continued as to whether or not to have a “main entry,” and whether or not to exercise the rule of three to limit the number of headings or access points in certain cases. Recent proposals from the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA have recommended a change in “main entry” terminology to “primary access point,” and the elimination of the rule of three. This article explores how and why these shifts have occurred.  相似文献   

12.
13.
Library of Congress subject headings (LCSHs) are generally felt to be especially inadequate in dealing with social science materials. I attempted to see whether PRECIS indexing "brought out" what a group of urban studies works were "about" better than LC subject cataloging. PRECIS does turn out to provide more access points than LCHS; but this advantage would disappear in an on-line catalog having key-word access. PRECIS also ends up providing apt headings more of the time than LCSH; its advantage here, however, would diminish if LCSH (1) employed more up-to-date vocabulary and (2) included a time facet more freely. Neither LCSH nor PRECIS turns out to be particularly successful in dealing with "multi-tiered works," those whose "intellectual subject(s)" differ from their "ostensible subject(s)." I argue that the best way to provide good subject access to these (as well as many other kinds of) works would involve supplementing traditional subject headings with abstracts or summaries.  相似文献   

14.
15.
16.
主要款目的存废之争   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2       下载免费PDF全文
多年以来 ,欧美国家对于主要款目的存废问题 ,主要是围绕着其标目范围、集中职能和查核复本的职能展开争论 ;日本和我国则是围绕着标目的选取问题展开争论。在当今计算机编目时代 ,主要款目完全可以废除。但在我国 ,主要款目存废问题仍在争论中。参考文献 4。  相似文献   

17.
In 2005/2006, the authors evaluated cataloging and physical processing supplied through the University of Arkansas Libraries' shelf-ready contract with YBP Library Services and PromptCat. The authors examined 298 titles from three samples, with emphasis placed on series headings. Results showed that while 99.33% of titles received records and 99.66% of records received correctly matched their corresponding books, 27.05% of records exhibited errors affecting catalog access, and records for 38.59% of titles needed modification. Moreover, 32.11% of series headings required further attention to comply with local authority procedures. This study should prove useful to other libraries contemplating a shelf-ready contract and the level of quality control they wish to exercise.  相似文献   

18.
This paper proposes a way to program the online catalog to retrieve and display together related serial records, by using the current accepted practice of successive entry cataloging and those MARC bibliographic fields unique to a successive entry record. The underlying theme to the discussion is that the cataloging record alone need not always bear the burden of explaining itself to the user; in fact, the online catalog with its menu options and displays can and should provide a useful structure within itself, a structure essential to the effective use of any library catalog.  相似文献   

19.
《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(2-3):139-160
Abstract

Mounting digital images of art objects on a Web site is only the first step in providing patron access to such materials. Libraries and museums have a responsibility to provide not only high-quality digital reproductions but also high-quality access from an integrated library catalog with controlled vocabulary and consistent access points. While some digital collections may have excellent internal searchability and require no more than collection level cataloging in a library's OPAC, others may demand cataloging of individual components of the collection. A particular collection's significance, its potential audience, the types of access required, as well as factors such as its size and cohesiveness need to be considered before becoming locked into a specific Web designespecially when it is that of another institution.

This paper examines several online library catalogs in which records for art objects as well as historical objects and natural history specimens have been merged, with varying degrees of success, and briefly addresses a modest proposal to catalog ceramic objects at the Ohio State University Libraries. The importance of consistent subject access in a merged catalog, regardless of the thesaurus or thesauri used, is stressed. Library consortia and bibliographic utilities may offer an economically appealing alternative for libraries that cannot design and construct their own digital libraries but these external organizations often have limited capability for-or interest in-modifying the design for a particular library and even less interest in cataloging the collections. Libraries, too, must be faulted for simply listing available electronic resources, either alphabetically or in broad subject categories, on a separate portion of their Web page and failing to provide full catalog records in their catalog. Finally, it is emphasized that the current debate over the viability of MARC 21 versus other metadata standards remains largely irrelevant to the importance of continuing to cultivate a monolithic online catalog, maintaining cataloging standards, and not mindlessly developing what amounts to a separate, rudimentary catalog solely for electronic resources.  相似文献   

20.
文章介绍了利用汇文系统进行开放获取期刊的编目实践,和字段著录中不同于其它文献类型编目之处,以及开放获取期刊书目数据维护工作要点。参考文献6。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号