共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 453 毫秒
1.
2.
现在不少教师上课（特别是公开、比赛课）,不是把劲用在“教什么”上,而是全花在了“怎么教”上。于是,有的教师不顾学生的消化能力,把教材处理成豪华的“满汉全席”;有的不管学段目标,只挑适合自己“胃口”的内容教……其实,“教什么”和“怎么教”属于两个不同的范畴,前者是“学术性”问题,后者为“技术性”问题。 相似文献
3.
学校教育的简单要素是学生、课程和教师;素质教育的核心问题是“培养什么人”和“怎样培养人”.学校教育的“个性”解构为“培养什么人”“用什么培养人”“什么人培养”.
一、培养什么人,是学校培养目标的问题.
目前,这方面存在偏离,偏离将导致学校教育错误的个性.需要从现象中厘清问题的根源. 相似文献
4.
职前教师教育项目所进行的教学改革,多是针对传统的“传递取向教学法”的不足而设计的,“用电影教”即为改革举措之一。“用电影教”能使教学适应职前教师的认知特点,促进教育理论与实践的联结,为职前教师的思考和讨论提供“催化剂”,并发展其技术品性。在职前教师教育中,“用电影教”可用于教授诸多学习主题,在教学过程上具有一定的灵活性,但也遵循一些共性的要求。对职前教师教育中的“用电影教”进行研究,能够为职前教师教育的教学法改革提供参考。 相似文献
5.
刘祥 《中学语文(读写新空间)》2023,(1):86-88
写什么、为什么要写、怎么样写,构成了教育写作的“三重密码”。“写什么”取决于日常教育生活中的好奇心和探究欲;“为什么要写”取决于教师自身的专业成长意识、教育情怀、教育理性和教育智慧;“怎么样写”则以“真实写作”和“合理表达”为两大抓手。教育写作的本质,在于用文字夯实专业发展的每一级台阶。 相似文献
6.
教育需要思想,教育需要成千上万有思想的教师,需要他们用自己的智慧去追求教育理想。有思想的教师是什么样的教师？有思想的教师是如何“炼”成的？如火如荼的中职和中小学学习实践科学发展观活动激活了教师这一群体。教师和校长是“培养什么人、怎样培养人”和“办什么样的学校、怎样办好学校”的思考者, 相似文献
7.
教师应当掌握怎样的技术 总被引：7，自引：2，他引：7
本文着力于探讨“教师应当掌握怎样的技术”这一问题,从4个方面进行分析:运用技术的实质是什么、教师应掌握哪些技术、教师应掌握多深的技术、如何培养教师的技术能力。对中国的教师教育和信息技术教育具有借鉴意义。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
教育技术能力是当代教师必备的专业能力。目前国内对教师已开展教育技术能力的培训,但存在着一些问题。教师教育技术能力培训的模式与手段必须是“教育技术”的。笔者认为,教师教育技术培训周期模型和“用技术支持学习”的理念,可能是我们对教师进行教育技术能力培训中可资借鉴的视角。本文以爱尔兰圣三一学院的教育技术培训课程为案例．透析其教师培训模式以及在lego机器人等综合技术建立学习环境中所折射的“用技术支持学习”的理念,以期为国内同行提供借鉴。 相似文献
11.
杜威实用主义思想对教育技术实验研究的启示 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
文章通过分析杜威实用主义思想在时下国内教育领域引起热议的原因及教育技术实验研究中存在的问题,指出杜威实用主义思想可以为时下教育技术实验研究提供借鉴。结合杜威的芝加哥大学教育实验,文章认为,教育技术实验应当创造性地借鉴杜威的实用主义思想,在方法论上,需要依托哲学、教育学、心理学等相关学科思想;在思维模式上,归纳与演绎并行,进行动态研究;在技术观上,教育技术实验中的“技术”选择应具有积极性与针对性;在实验环境上,提倡自然实验环境,重视实验环境建设;在实验科学性上,求真与求善内在统一、科学论证、谨慎推广,走适合国情的教育技术实验研究之路。 相似文献
12.
Technology education, not to be confused with educational technology, has an “official curriculum.” This article explores this “official curriculum” and answers the following questions; what are the goals of technology education, what should technology education look like in classrooms, and why technology education is important. This article provides a primer on technology education that would be helpful to educational professionals interested in helping students become more technological literate. 相似文献
13.
Nicholas D. Hartlep Bradley J. Porfilio 《Educational Studies A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association》2015,51(4):300-316
In this article, we situate the imminent extinction of educational foundations within larger macro contexts, including the corporate control of knowledge production, the marginalization of critical academics who challenge the social, economic, and political status quos, and the global (United States in particular) economic recession. We also reaffirm why the field of educational foundations is important for this particular historical moment. In an effort to fight neoliberalism's stranglehold on PK–20 education, we provide guideposts for other like-minded critical educators. Specifically, these guideposts speak to why educational foundations are (despite their maltreatment and marginalization) an integral part to PK–12 teacher preparation and provide a call to action requiring educational foundations faculty members to inform those who still do not know that schools serve to reinforce the existing power, political, race, and economic relations. 相似文献
14.
Why we all want it to work: towards a culturally based model for technology and educational change 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Stephen T. Kerr 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2005,36(6):1005-1016
This paper explores reasons why the use of technology in education may be so attractive to so many people. Two emerging perspectives—memetics, and the social history of technology—are explored, and a typology of technology‐as‐cultural‐tool is presented. Finally, implications of these ideas for educational change are considered. 相似文献
15.
Karley Beckman Sue Bennett Lori Lockyer 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2019,50(6):3315-3328
Disparities in the technology practices, skills and knowledge of school students still exist, despite widespread investment, and use in schools. In order to understand why inequalities remain, we first need a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology practice, including understanding how their backgrounds, circumstances and experiences shape their perceptions of and engagement with technology. This paper proposes that research in the field of educational technology would benefit from a sociological framing in order to highlight how and why students use technology at school and in their everyday lives. The paper reports on a qualitative embedded case study of 13–16-year-old students in two Australian secondary schools. In-depth case studies of two selected students illustrate the complex nature of students’ technology practice. Bourdieu’s concepts of field, habitus and capital are used as a lens through which to view and understand inequalities in students’ technology practice. The findings demonstrate the utility of sociological theory in educational technology research by highlighting systems and structures of reproduction and transformation. Furthermore, the findings can inform an approach to teaching and learning that considers students’ varied experiences, knowledge, perspectives and backgrounds relating to technology. 相似文献
16.
17.
David M. Bourrie Casey G. Cegielski L. Allison Jones‐Farmer Chetan S. Sankar 《Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education》2014,12(4):357-380
Although considerable work has been done to develop new educational innovations, few have found widespread acceptance in the classroom. To improve the likelihood of adoption of educational innovations, researchers need to understand why some innovations are adopted and routinely used, while others are not. An initial aspect of the diffusion of innovations, as defined in the classical sociological literature, involves the communication of ideas and concepts related to innovations between individuals. This article presents an expert panel's answer to the following question: “What are the most important characteristics that relate to the dissemination of educational innovations?” As dissemination is a critical facet of the diffusion of an innovation, 45 researchers who received technology and engineering grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) participated in a Delphi study designed to address this research question. In three rounds, the experts identified and ranked 11 characteristics of educational innovations, 6 characteristics of students, 13 characteristics of faculty members, and 5 characteristics of administrators that can relate to the successful dissemination of educational innovations. The results of this study led to the formation of a Characteristics of Dissemination Success (CODS) framework. This framework offers useful guidance for educational innovators seeking a better understanding of the influences on the dissemination of educational innovations. 相似文献
18.
For educational technology integration in content disciplines to succeed, teachers and teacher educators need clear standards delineating why, how, where, and how much educational technology they should include in their teaching. This paper examines the visions offered by current science, mathematics, and educational technology standards for educational technology integration in K-12 schools. Since national assessments exert a profound influence on what teachers and students choose to teach and learn, the vision of educational technology use supported by national assessments is also examined. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards (NCTM, 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved April 6, 2002 from http://standards.nctm.org), the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council (NRC) 1996. National Science Education Standards. Available at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html), and the National Educational Technology Standards (International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) 2000. National Educational Technology Standards for Students: Connecting Curriculum and Technology, ISTE, Eugene, Oregon) provide different visions of educational technology use in the classroom. In addition, the current technology use policies for national assessments in science and mathematics, in particular the college admission tests (ACT, SAT I and SAT II subject area tests), Advanced Placement (AP) course assessments, and the Praxis Series assessments indicate that while mathematics assessments often recommend or require the use of educational technology, few science assessments permit the use of educational technology by students. Recommendations are offered for science educators regarding teacher preparation for the technology-rich classrooms of the future. 相似文献
19.
近30年来我国对就近入学政策的研究疏于对这一政策的内容进行分析,而教育政策的内容分析是教育政策分析的起点。改革开放以来的有关教育法律文本和教育政策文本中,对就近入学政策在对由谁来实施以及对谁实施就近入学、对为什么要实施就近入学、对怎样实施就近入学以及对怎样保障实施就近入学进行了规范。用法律规范的假设、处理和制裁三个要件和政策规范的目标、对象和措施三个要素对上述规范进行分析发现,法律规范中的就近入学政策比较重视处理规范,而对假设和制裁重视不够;政策规范中的就近入学政策存在政策目标不稳定、政策对象不够全面以及政策措施不够统一和配套等问题。完善我国就近入学政策的内容就要在法律规范和政策规范上克服存在的这些问题。 相似文献
20.
From 1870 until the outbreak of the Second World War there were various attempts at educational reform in Greece, one of the most significant being the intention to establish a national technical–vocational education. The aim of this study is to examine why such a reform was deemed necessary and yet failed to be implemented. The first part examines how foreign influences played an important role in shaping the Greek educational system, both in the type of institution provided and by those Greek students who had studied abroad. Next, there is a close analysis of the official discourse on technical–vocational education, along with an examination of why it was felt that a segmented educational system constituted such a priority. Finally, a critical evaluation is provided to explain how the rhetoric and action of successive Greek governments inevitably failed as a result of ideological confusion and political patronage. 相似文献