共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
正确认识和理解“核心期刊” 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
对《质疑“核心期刊”论》中的一些观点进行了认真的分析,指出核心期刊是关于某一学科文献的,而不是关于某一学科期刊的。一个学科文献的核心指的是该学科核心期刊的整体,而不是核心期刊的个体。核心期刊的研制主要在于文献计量学意义、而不是对期刊等级的划分、更与政治无关。 相似文献
2.
本刊讯:由北京大学图书馆和北京高校图书馆期刊工作研究会共同组织评选的第五届中国"新闻核心期刊",近日通过评审鉴定,《当代传播》再次当选。这次评选出来的28家"新闻核心期刊",是北京大学图书馆文献计量学研究室从全国公开出版、属于"文 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
由北京大学图书馆和北京高校图书馆期刊工作研究会共同组织评选的第四届“新闻核心期刊”,近日通过评审鉴定。《新闻与写作》再次当选。 相似文献
6.
7.
由北京大学图书馆和北京高校图书馆期刊工作研究会共同组织评选的第四届全国“新闻核心期刊”,近日通过评审鉴定,由新华日报报业集团主办的新闻理论刊物《传媒观察》光荣当选。 相似文献
8.
本文从我馆对GALE公司的InfoTrac Custom期刊数据库组织评选的实际工作出发,总结了我馆对该数据库的期刊具体的评选程序,提出了这种新的数据库的组织采购模式对当前的数据库采购的意义, 相似文献
9.
当前核心期刊存在的问题与对策 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
陈图文 《大学图书情报学刊》2000,(1):43-44
期刊的等级性问题具有较大的敏感性,国内一些部门对期刊的等级划分一直持否定态度,认为期刊等级划分不利于学术之争,这是一种极为肤浅的认识. 相似文献
10.
11.
具备条件的医学期刊可以考虑争取进入MEDLINE,争取进入MEDLINE的过程实际上是一个学习、提高的过程,也是转变办刊观念、使期刊逐步与国际接轨的过程。这个过程对提高期刊水平,缩短差距,会起到很大的促进作用。 相似文献
12.
13.
Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
The impact factor of a journal reflects the frequency with which the journal's articles are cited. It is the best available measure of journal quality. For calculation of impact factor, we just count the number of citations, no matter how prestigious the citing journal is. We think that impact factor as a measure of journal quality, may be improved if in its calculation, we not only take into account the number of citations, but also incorporate a factor reflecting the prestige of the citing journals relative to the cited journal. In calculation of this proposed “weighted impact factor,” each citation has a coefficient (weight) the value of which is 1 if the citing journal is as prestigious as the cited journal; is >1 if the citing journal is more prestigious than the cited journal; and is <1 if the citing journal has a lower standing than the cited journal. In this way, journals receiving many citations from prestigious journals are considered prestigious themselves and those cited by low-status journals seek little credit. By considering both the number of citations and the prestige of the citing journals, we expect the weighted impact factor be a better scientometrics measure of journal quality. 相似文献
14.
15.
期刊引用认同及其被引评价新指标有效性分析 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1
以影响因子等引文数据为核心的期刊评价指标体系虽广为使用,但也备受争议.本文从期刊引用认同、期刊被引及期刊国际化等三个方面分析了不仅仅依赖于"影响因子"的评价期刊的新指标,并对相关指标的有效性问题进行讨论.分析表明,基于期刊引用认同视角和基于期刊被引网络视角的很多指标可以与期刊影响因子指标相印证,可用作国内期刊评价的新尝试,而相关期刊国际化评价指标还需在实践中进一步检验. 相似文献
16.
Louisa Ha 《Learned Publishing》2003,16(3):193-199
This article re‐examines the economics of publishing scholarly journals and illustrates the dilemma of publisher identity and publication format with a case study of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication's Media Management and Economics division. The study investigates the perceived interest and demand for a society‐published journal for the field of media management and economics and the preferred format for that journal – print or online. Results showed a divided opinion on the support of a society‐published journal and no consideration of the benefits or harms of journal publishing to the society. The print journal, though a desirable format for authors, is deemed uneconomical. The online journal is viewed as a feasible publication outlet, but its status as a prestigious journal is doubtful. Applications of scholarly journal publishing and economic models to the case are discussed. 相似文献
17.
18.
学术期刊质量评价与核心期刊评价之异同 总被引:6,自引:1,他引:5
从质量上评价学术期刊,必须首先厘认清基本概念。学术期刊质量评价与核心期刊评价在概念的内涵和外延、评价的方式方法和评价语词等方面有区别,但都能在一定程度上反映期刊的质量,尽管核心期刊不是直接、全面反映期刊质量。把握和处理好两者评价的异同的“度”,对期刊评价和管理至关重要。从质量整体上评价期刊的学术水平,应更加注重学术期刊评价的目的性,注重分类分层评价,更加注重指标对期刊质量的导引作用,注重同行专家定性评价。 相似文献
19.
《Journal of Informetrics》2023,17(3):101429
Despite the recent moving towards open access trend in the academic community, both restricted and open access journals continue to coexist. New journals need to choose their journal types (open versus restricted access), while the incumbent journals may change their journal types. To better understand how the academic community is shaped by journals’ choices of journal types, we constructed a game-theoretical model of journal competition with endogenous journal qualities and journal types. We found that journals’ equilibrium quality and types vary by article processing charge (APC) and journals’ preference for quality. Compared to the case that both journals are open access, a competition among journals of different types leads to higher journal quality standards chosen in equilibrium when APC is modest. Therefore, in the academic community where the research quality is measured by the highest quality of the journals therein, journals of different types guarantee a good degree of knowledge diffusion with a high quality. 相似文献
20.
《吴医汇讲》:中国第一份中文期刊 总被引:2,自引:2,他引:0
为了澄清究竟哪本期刊是中国第一份中文期刊,我们通过追根溯源,梳理中国期刊发端的史实,否定了某些人宣称的200年前由外国传教士在马来西亚创办的《察世俗每月统记传》为中国第一份中文期刊的主张,以雄辩的史料确认:223年前由国人在苏州创办的《吴医汇讲》才是名副其实的中国第一份中文期刊. 相似文献