共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 280 毫秒
1.
知识审计与知识管理的有效实现 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
从知识管理评价角度分析,指出知识审计是实现有效知识管理的第一步;阐述了知识审计的概念、知识审计的实施,并探讨了用知识审计的结果诊断组织知识的现状和需求。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
知识管理审计是组织实施知识管理的首要步骤和知识战略的重要组成部分,贯穿于知识管理活动的始终.基于行为、流程和绩效的原理,将各种知识管理审计模型分为概念性、过程性和测量性架构,深入剖析各个模型的构成,内容和要素等,并进行比较研究,最后对知识管理审计的研究发展进行了展望. 相似文献
5.
知识管理审计的概念、模型与方法研究 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
知识管理实施的一项重要内容是对知识管理的绩效进行评估,对知识管理的需求与计划进行审核,完成知识管理过程的正反馈闭环系统,才能不断优化知识管理的推行。提出了知识管理审计的完整概念,并建立了知识管理审计的概念模型,给出了企业在推行知识管理审计时的工作流程和一般方法。 相似文献
6.
7.
知识审计是知识管理项目实施的首要步骤以及知识管理战略的重要组成部分。在比较30种知识审计架构的审计活动过程的基础上, 依据过程展示图的元过程图和元展示图的原理与技术, 建立起企业知识审计的活动与子活动列表及其所包含的概念列表, 深入揭示了知识审计活动的内在逻辑关联与相互作用关系, 为现代企业更好地认知与实施知识审计, 促进知识审计效益最大化提供帮助和借鉴。 相似文献
8.
以产品开发全过程作为研究对象,将产品开发流程分为产品构思、产品设计和产品实施三个循环阶段。针对三个阶段中知识流特征,提出在这三阶段中应分别实施知识管理审计战略、知识地图战略和知识专利战略,使企业能够迅速、准确地开发出高质量的产品来满足市场需要,并获得较高的知识回报率。 相似文献
9.
知识联盟组织之间知识共享研究 总被引：1，自引：2，他引：1
在讨论知识联盟与知识共享的概念、特征的基础上，分析了知识联盟组织之间知识共享的驱动力、实施条件和障碍，进而提出实现知识联盟组织之间知识共享的途径是建立交互学习机制的观点。 相似文献
10.
知识经济时代，知识已经取代资本和劳动成为组织的第一资源。知识本身具有一系列特殊属性，相应的给组织的知识获取、利用、共享和创造带来了许多难题，明确这些难题对于企业实施有效的知识管理具有指导意义。 相似文献
11.
基于情境感知的自适应个性化知识服务研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在Web2.0环境下,由于用户成为了知识构建的适应性主体,还原了知识构建与服务的人本原生态,使个人知识构建表现出自组织原理。这为基于情境感知的自适应个性化知识服务实现和系统构建提供了有利条件,但其具体实现尚需借助本体在对知识项和情境信息进行统一语义描述和推理方面的优势才能更好得以实施。 相似文献
12.
Improving the effectiveness of knowledge transfer from a parent firm to its subsidiary is one of the most critical issues confronting management at multinational companies (MNC). Since knowledge tends to be sticky and difficult to transfer, the success of knowledge transfer is contingent not only upon various kinds of contextual variables, but also upon the process of knowledge transfer implementation and internalization. Previous studies did not consider the process of implementation and internalization variables, and failed to provide a more comprehensive research framework for MNC knowledge transfer. This study attempts to assess the impact of knowledge stickiness on knowledge transfer implementation and internalization, as well as the performance of headquarter–subsidiary knowledge transfer. Results of this study suggest that an increase in knowledge stickiness may have a positive and significant influence on knowledge implementation, internalization, and knowledge transfer satisfaction. However, increases in knowledge stickiness beyond a certain point can also deter the success of transferring knowledge. Results also suggest a significant relationship between knowledge transfer implementation and internalization, innovation and satisfaction, and between knowledge innovation and knowledge transfer satisfaction. 相似文献
13.
个人与组织知识转化的知识链机理 总被引：8，自引：1，他引：8
本文提出了知识裂变与聚变是知识管理的本质。从生产要索的变化与转移，知识管理模式影响投入产出，个人知识裂变是知识创造的根源，知识聚变是知识管理的本质四个方面论述了个人知识与组织知识相互转化。 相似文献
14.
论知识创新与知识组织、知识管理 总被引：15，自引：2，他引：13
知识经济时代,知识创新已成为知识经济发展的生命线,本文提出实现知识创新的途径－加强知识组织与知识管理,在分析知识经济研究领域成果的基础上,总结了加强知识组织与知识管理的几点具体措施。 相似文献
15.
企业协同知识创新是企业提高动态能力和获取持续竞争优势的重要途径,而知识共享则是协同知识创新活动开展的前提和基础,也是其成败的关键。在分析国内外相关研究成果的基础上,探讨了协同知识创新中知识共享的特征、影响因素及主要问题,结合协同管理理论和知识治理理论分析、探讨了知识共享的过程及其治理机制,进而构建企业协同知识创新的知识共享体系。 相似文献
16.
知识联盟中的知识管理 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
本文讨论了知识联盟的概念、特征、类型及作用，分析了知识联盟中知识管理的主要内容，认为有效的知识管理是知识联盟成功的关键，提出了加强知识联盟中的知识管理的对策。 相似文献
17.
知识管理中的知识流动分析 总被引：15，自引：0，他引：15
知识流向、流速是知识管理中的瓶颈问题。文章在对知识管理中的知识分类和特征的分析基础上，对其不同的流动方式和特征进行了研究，并进而探讨了知识流动中存在的几个问题，希望能对知识管理的策略有一定的启发意义。 相似文献
18.
刍议知识管理及其体系框架 总被引：37，自引：2，他引：35
随着知识经济的来临,知识管理已日益受到人们的重视。本文论述了知识、知识管理的基本含义,分析了知识管理的两个基本要素即知识创新和知识共享,阐述了知识管理的基本手段,最后提出了知识管理的体系框架。 相似文献
19.
20.
Context Open Source Software (OSS) development is a knowledge focused activity which relies heavily on contributors who can be volunteers or paid workers and are geographically distributed. While working on OSS projects contributors acquire project related individualistic knowledge and gain experience and skills, which often remains unshared with others and is usually lost once contributors leave a project. All software development organisations face the problem of knowledge loss as employees leave, but this situation is exasperated in OSS projects where most contributors are volunteers with largely unpredictable engagement durations. Contributor turnover is inevitable due to the transient nature of OSS project workforces causing knowledge loss, which threatens the overall sustainability of OSS projects and impacts negatively on software quality and contributor productivity.ObjectiveThe objective of this work is to deeply and systematically investigate the phenomenon of knowledge loss due to contributor turnover in OSS projects as presented in the state-of-the-art literature and to synthesise the information presented on the topic. Furthermore, based on the learning arising from our investigation it is our intention to identify mechanisms to reduce the overall effects of knowledge loss in OSS projects.MethodologyWe use the snowballing methodology to identify the relevant literature on knowledge loss due to contributor turnover in OSS projects. This robust methodology for a literature review includes research question, search strategy, inclusion, exclusion, quality criteria, and data synthesis. The search strategy, and inclusion, exclusions and quality criteria are applied as a part of snowballing procedure.Snowballing is considered an efficient and reliable way to conduct a systematic literature review, providing a robust alternative to mechanically searching individual databases for given topics.ResultKnowledge sharing in OSS projects is abundant but there is no evidence of a formal strategy or practice to manage knowledge. Due to the dynamic and diverse nature of OSS projects, knowledge management is considered a challenging task and there is a need for a proactive mechanism to share knowledge in the OSS community for knowledge to be reused in the future by the OSS project contributors. From the collection of papers found using snowballing, we consolidated various themes on knowledge loss due to contributor turnover in OSS projects and identified 11 impacts due to knowledge loss in OSS projects, and 10 mitigations to manage with knowledge loss in OSS projects.ConclusionIn this paper, we propose future research directions to investigate integration of proactive knowledge retention practices with the existing OSS practices to reduce the current knowledge loss problem. We suggest that there is insufficient attention paid to KM in general in OSS, in particular there would appear to an absence of proactive measures to reduce the potential impact of knowledge loss. We also propose the need for a KM evaluation metric in OSS projects, similar to the ones that evaluate health of online communities, which should help to inform potential consumers of the OSS of the KM status on a project, something that is not existent today. 相似文献