共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
《Library & information science research》2014,36(3-4):163-170
The preferences of the authors of Chinese library and information science (LIS) journal articles in citing Internet sources were investigated using eight premium Chinese LIS journals from Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (the observation group) and 10 journals in other disciplines (the control group) from the same database from 1999 to 2008. A total of 252,881 citations were analyzed in terms of count, domain name, and citing purposes. The results show that (a) in comparison to the disciplines in the control group, LIS articles in Chinese journals indicated a strong preference for citing Internet sources, and this preference is increasing; (b) LIS articles did not seem to discriminate against domain names when citing Internet sources; and (c) LIS articles cited more Internet sources as evidence to support research results and conclusions. Excessive dependency on Internet sources may raise concerns over the quality, research ethics, and credibility of research publications. Chinese LIS researchers should place more emphasis on the disadvantages of Internet sources as supporting material. Guidelines and criteria to help researchers, journal editors, students, and librarians assess information on the Web need to be developed. 相似文献
2.
标准化影响因子在不同学科期刊比较中的应用 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
影响因子被用来评价科技期刊、科研人员及科研机构的学术水平,但由于学科间规模、发展速度不同,导致不同学科的期刊拥有不同的半衰期和文献利用规律,因此把影响因子直接用于不同学科间期刊的评价是不公平的.为了避免这种不公平,提出了"标准化影响因子"的概念,它通过对科技期刊的影响因子进行一次非线性转换和线性转换而得到,可以减小影响因子在评价不同学科期刊时的误差. 相似文献
3.
由Web of Science数据库分析高影响力中华医学会系列期刊引发的思考 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
通过Web of Science数据库的“被引参考文献检索”途径,将中华医学会123种非SCI期刊作为国内大量的非SCI科技期刊的代表,统计其刊载文献被SCI期刊引用的情况;以被引文献数量大于50篇作为高影响力期刊的筛选条件,分析其中高影响力期刊的被引文献数量、单篇被引文献最高引用频次、施引文献数量、施引文献最高被引频次以及施引文献的国家地区分布、出版年份分布,从而了解这些非SCI科技期刊的国际影响力.基于这一分析,认为SCI期刊并非是获得同行认可的唯一途径,国内大量的非SCI科技期刊应走“立足国内,面向世界”的发展道路,以踏实做专业领域内有影响力的期刊为目标;同时呼吁国家有关部门能对现行科研评价指标进行调整,鼓励质量上乘的稿件能选择具有影响力的国内期刊发表. 相似文献
4.
《Journal of Informetrics》2022,16(4):101338
Knowledge flow between scientific disciplines has commonly been measured based on citation data. Previous studies using citing relationships have mostly considered direct citations but have paid little attention to indirect citations (IDC) to indicate how knowledge diffusion from one discipline to another via one or more intermediaries. In this study, we measured knowledge flow between disciplines from two perspectives: direct citations (DC) and discipline potential energy (DPE), which is proposed to combine both direct and indirect citations. Data were collected from the Web of Science (WoS) database. Findings include: (1) DPE overshadows previous measures by considering not only direct citations but also indirect citations between disciplines which was usually ignored in previous measures, and revealed that the knowledge contribution of some disciplines had been underestimated by previous measures, such as Physics and Engineering. (2) The proportion of IDC contribution is close to that of direct knowledge contribution when the discipline scale is removed, which suggests that it is essential to consider IDC to distinguish the knowledge relationship (net-outflow/inflow) between disciplines. (3) Both measurements show that Biology & Biochemistry has always been the top discipline with the highest net outflow of knowledge, which is inconsistent with the history of science that Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry would be the highest net outflow disciplines. The results show that even considering IDC does not fully reveal the knowledge contribution and academic influence of disciplines. This paper also analyzes the potential reasons for citation bias in revealing the contribution of disciplinary knowledge from a citation perspective. Therefore, caution should be taken in the use of citations as a primary measure of knowledge flow. 相似文献
5.
[目的/意义]数字人文作为新兴的跨学科研究领域,受到许多学科的广泛关注。本文旨在探析数字人文在图情档学科中的知识扩散,供数字人文和图情档发展借鉴。[方法/过程]以Web of Science核心数据集为数据来源,通过对数字人文在图情档的目标文献以及目标文献的图情档施引文献两部分数据的期刊扩散性和主题扩散性两个维度进行分析。其中,期刊扩散性采用来自传播学的期刊双向传播理论以及改良的消除时间因素影响的期刊引证系数两个指标进行分析,主题扩散性采用基于关键词的词云图和基于关键词的聚类进行分析。[结果/结论]研究表明,期刊双向传播中扩散性大于1的期刊共有13个,JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS为双向扩散性能最好的期刊;数字人文在图情档学科所属学科期刊引证系数排名靠前的期刊有JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS、SCIENTOMETRICS、JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY等;期刊引证系数均呈现上下波动的现象,但是基本上top10的期刊在2006、2012、2016年出现了峰值,表明这些期刊在这些年份的影响力较大;数字人文研究现状、数字人文与图书馆融合、数字人文在教学中的应用、数字人文的激励措施在目标文献和施引文献的主题中均形成了规模,可以认为这四个方向的主题为数字人文在图情档的重点研究内容。 相似文献
6.
《编辑学报》论文被Web of Science数据库引用情况分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
对被Web of Science数据库(WOS)引用的《编辑学报》56篇论文,从被引和施引作者、作者单位、论文关键词、施引期刊等方面进行分析,并对这些引文同时被《中文社会科学引文》(CSSCI)数据库引用情况作比较,从中了解《编辑学报》在国内外学术界被关注的程度、研究主题及相关学者等信息,发现引用和施引论文的学者及研究机构,提出缩短出版周期等建议,进一步提高《编辑学报》的学术质量及其在学科领域的影响力。 相似文献
7.
应用基于期刊"引文-文本"拟合相似度的混合聚类算法对Web of Science中SCI、SSCI、A&HCI收录的8 305余种期刊进行聚类分析,并将期刊混合聚类结果与基本科学指标ESI学科分类体系进行比较研究。对于聚类结果与ESI体系相一致的期刊,认为其具有较强的"学科关联度",定义为相应学科领域的"学科内核",其余部分则为"学科外围"。"内核期刊"界定了相应学科的核心知识范围,"外围期刊"则诠释了不同学科的分化和交叉融合等结构特征。 相似文献
8.
9.
Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
The impact factor of a journal reflects the frequency with which the journal's articles are cited. It is the best available measure of journal quality. For calculation of impact factor, we just count the number of citations, no matter how prestigious the citing journal is. We think that impact factor as a measure of journal quality, may be improved if in its calculation, we not only take into account the number of citations, but also incorporate a factor reflecting the prestige of the citing journals relative to the cited journal. In calculation of this proposed “weighted impact factor,” each citation has a coefficient (weight) the value of which is 1 if the citing journal is as prestigious as the cited journal; is >1 if the citing journal is more prestigious than the cited journal; and is <1 if the citing journal has a lower standing than the cited journal. In this way, journals receiving many citations from prestigious journals are considered prestigious themselves and those cited by low-status journals seek little credit. By considering both the number of citations and the prestige of the citing journals, we expect the weighted impact factor be a better scientometrics measure of journal quality. 相似文献
10.
The relationship between researchers’ publishing and citing behaviours has received little examination despite its potential importance in scholarly communication, particularly at an international level. To remedy this we studied documents and their references indexed in Thomson Reuters's Web of Science (WoS) in the period 2000–2009 to compare journal publishing behaviours against journal citing behaviours across the world. The results reveal that most publications in, and citations to, all five quality based strata of journals examined come from scientifically and economically advanced countries. Nevertheless, in proportion to their total number of citations given to WoS journals, it seems that less developed countries cite high-quality journals at the same rate as developed countries and so the poorer publishing of less developed countries does not seem to be due to a lack of access to top journals. Moreover, examining the publishing and citing trends of countries revealed a decreasing rate of high-income and Scientifically Advanced Countries (SACs) publications in, and citations to, all quality ranges of journals in comparison to the increasing rate of publications and citations of other groups. Finally, research cooperation between developed and less developed countries seems to positively influence the publishing behaviour of the latter as their publications co-authored with developed countries were published more often in top journals. 相似文献
11.
期刊学术影响力、期刊对稿件的录用标准和期刊载文的学术影响力三者之间存在同向加强的机制,来自较高影响力期刊的引用具有较高的评价意义。作者的择刊引用和择刊发表使得较低学术影响力的期刊较少被较高影响力期刊引用。因而,可以通过同时考察构成期刊引证形象的施引期刊的学术影响力及其施引频次来评价被引期刊的学术影响力。以综合性期刊Nature和Science 2010年的引证形象为例,将期刊影响因子作为学术影响力的初评结果,提出了以施引频次对施引期刊影响因子加权的计算方法,以期通过量化的引证形象实现对期刊的评价。 相似文献
12.
13.
利用知识可视化软件（CiteSpace Ⅱ）,对Web of Science（SCI-E,SSCI）中1975-2010 年收录的2863 篇引
文分析论文进行研究。分别分析引文研究文献的时间分布、地区分布、机构分布、期刊分布、学科分布以及学科代表人
物与其经典作品,从而直观地揭示引文分析研究发展的现状,并通过对关键词出现的频率和共现情况,确定引文分析研
究热点,基于主题词变动趋势描绘引文分析的研究前沿。 相似文献
14.
Stevens SR 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》2000,88(2):172-177
The major purpose of this study was to identify and assess indexing coverage of core journals in cytotechnology. It was part of a larger project sponsored by the Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section of the Medical Library Association to map the literature of allied health. Three representative journals in cytotechnology were selected and subjected to citation analysis to determine what journals, other publication types, and years were cited and how often. Bradford's Law of Scattering was applied to the resulting list of cited journals to identify core titles in the discipline, and five indexes were searched to assess coverage of these core titles. Results indicated that the cytotechnology journal literature had a small core but wide dispersion: one third of the 21,021 journal citations appeared in only 3 titles; another third appeared in an additional 26 titles; the remaining third were scattered in 1,069 different titles. Science Citation Index Expanded rated highest in indexing coverage of the core titles, followed by MEDLINE, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, HealthSTAR, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). The study's results also showed that journals were the predominantly cited format and that citing authors relied strongly on more recent literature. 相似文献
15.
《Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services》2007,31(1):42-57
Aim:The purpose of this study is to identify and describe the citing behavior of geomatics postgraduate students at the Wuhan University in China. These students constitute one of the main user groups of Wuhan University Library and the analysis of their use of literature (through the means of citation analysis) can yield valuable insights against which to benchmark and inform collection development policy and other services at the Information Technology Library (ITL) at Wuhan University.Design/methodology/approach:In this project, 9317 citations in 21 PhD and 180 MSc theses submitted at the Wuhan University in the years of 1988, 1996, and 2004 were analyzed. All cited materials were divided by output format (monographs, proceedings, journal articles) and the more in-depth analysis was conducted for all cited journals. The following characteristics of the cited journal literature were analyzed: subject, age, language, and dispersion of journal titles.Findings:An increased use of journal literature in bibliographies of geomatics theses was observed over time. A trend to increase citations to international conference proceedings was also noted as well as a trend to cite more journals in disciplines other than surveying and mapping. It was also noted that, over time, citations to documents in languages other than Chinese and English have significantly decreased (in some cases, disappeared). Large dispersion among the most frequently cited journals in different time periods (only 25% of titles were repeated in 1988, 1996, and 2004 top ranking journal lists) was also noted. It was also noted that the core of geomatics literature is expanding (it now takes 42% of journal titles to cover 80% of all citations).Practical implications:By analyzing citation patterns of the graduate students of geomatics in China, we can track the developments and changes within that discipline in China and can compare these trends internationally (e.g. increased role of a journal, the importance of conference proceedings, domination of the English-language sources, dispersion of journal literature, and increasing multidisciplinarity of the discipline). The techniques and methods used in this study can be replicated to study other disciplines. Also, it is hoped that the findings of this research will inform collection development planning, development of reference services, and information literacy training. 相似文献
16.
Michael Anton Matos 《期刊图书馆员》2016,70(1-4):260-265
Libraries often wonder if their collections can support their faculty’s research. Large citation databases, such as Scopus or Web of Science, can help automate such a review process. This session will present findings about to what extent faculty were able to complete their journal publications without utilizing interlibrary loan. Using data gathered from Scopus, the range and date of journals referenced by faculty at my home institution will be compared with holdings from my library’s electronic resources knowledge base to determine the level of overlap. Results will be presented by journal discipline to highlight any variation among the science, social science, and arts and humanities divisions. Special emphasis will be given to using this data to inform decisions about purchasing journal backfile collections. 相似文献
17.
《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(2):406-418
The journal impact factor is not comparable among fields of science and social science because of systematic differences in publication and citation behavior across disciplines. In this work, a source normalization of the journal impact factor is proposed. We use the aggregate impact factor of the citing journals as a measure of the citation potential in the journal topic, and we employ this citation potential in the normalization of the journal impact factor to make it comparable between scientific fields. An empirical application comparing some impact indicators with our topic normalized impact factor in a set of 224 journals from four different fields shows that our normalization, using the citation potential in the journal topic, reduces the between-group variance with respect to the within-group variance in a higher proportion than the rest of indicators analyzed. The effect of journal self-citations over the normalization process is also studied. 相似文献
18.
通过中国知网收集国内20所医学院校相关信息,调查分析2006—2010年各院校发表科技论文的情况,各院校主办科技期刊的状况,拥有两院院士、长江学者情况以及国家级重点学科建设情况,比较各院校论文发表比例,分析各院校主办科技期刊及其与拥有两院院士、长江学者数量以及国家级重点学科建设的相关性。结果表明:重点学科论文在校内科技期刊发表的比例平均仅占25.45%,有10所院校重点学科论文80%以上发表在校外期刊,而有8所院校的学报刊发表本校重点学科论文不足10%,仅有3所院校超过30%;各院校拥有两院院士、长江学者数量与重点学科建设具有相关性(rs=0.706, rs=0.679,均P＜0.01),重点学科建设则与科技期刊的创办密切相关(rs=0.614, P＜0.01)。认为高校科技期刊特别是高校学报的功能与定位需要改革,高校科技期刊社与专家学者应共同努力提高高校科技期刊的影响力。 相似文献
19.
Despite its rising position as a first-class research object, scientific software remains a marginal object in studies of scholarly communication. This study aims to fill the gap by examining the co-mention network of R packages across all Public Library of Science (PLoS) journals. To that end, we developed a software entity extraction method and identified 14,310 instances of R packages across the 13,684 PLoS journal papers mentioning or citing R. A paper-level co-mention network of these packages was visualized and analyzed using three major centrality measures: degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and PageRank. We analyzed the distributive patterns of R packages in all PLoS papers, identified the top packages mentioned in these papers, and examined the clustering structure of the network. Specifically, we found that the discipline and function of the packages can partly explain the largest clusters. The present study offers the first large-scale analysis of R packages’ extensive use in scientific research. As such, it lays the foundation for future explorations of various roles played by software packages in the scientific enterprise. 相似文献
20.
期刊共引分析及可视化实证研究——以图书情报学研究为例 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
文章利用ISI的Web of Science中的SSCI数据库,对1996～2008年8月期间收录的24种图书情报学核心期刊引文进行了期刊共引分析,并绘制了图书情报科学研究的知识图谱.知识图谱显示,目前国际图书情报学领域主要分为图书馆学和情报学两大部分.图书馆学研究大致包括网络资源组织、数字图书馆、开放获取、知识组织、用户服务等主流学科领域;情报学大致包括网络计量研究、信息(引文)计量研究、科学计量学理论、科研指标与评价、信息检索及用户检索行为理论研究、电子信息系统与服务及用户行为研究等主流学科领域. 相似文献