首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 703 毫秒
1.
数学学优生与学困生在元认知技能的前测成绩存在显著性差异,但3个数学困生的实验组的元认知技能前测成绩没有显著差异;经元认知技能的短期训练后,数学学困生在元认知技能方面有显著性的提高,但与学优生的差异仍然显著;3个数困生的干预组的元认知技能后测分数之间没有显著差异.  相似文献   

2.
数学元认知差异的相关研究及启示   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
本文通过回顾关于数学元认知的相关研究,对数学元认知的理论和学生数学元认知差异的主要表现进行了分析与梳理.相关研究发现,学生的数学元认知水平在数学学优生与学困生、性别、年龄等方面,差异较为明显.文章最后指出了相关研究对数学教学的启示.  相似文献   

3.
中学生工作记忆资源分配策略的研究结果表明:(1)随着问题难度的增加,首次内部思考时间也在增加.在解决简单问题时,学优生与学困生的首次内部思考时间没有显著差异,但是在解决中等题和难题时,学优生与学困生的首次内部思考时间存在显著差异.(2)学优生使用外部策略的总频数呈现随着数学问题难度的增大而增加的趋势,而学困生使用外部策略的频数呈下降的趋势.这说明,较学困生而言,学优生能够较合理地利用工作记忆资源.  相似文献   

4.
师范大学生在数学问题解决中元认知的基本情况为:(1)大学生在数学问题解决中的元认知存在一定程度的差异.(2)就数学问题解决中的元认知总体水平而言,女生比男生好;大三学生明显优于大二、大一学生,大一学生优于大二学生,大二年级是元认知水平发展的转折期.(3)优生、不良生在元认知总体水平有显著性差异,优生的元认知策略知识、元认知体验、元认知策略的评价、反思、调控水平明显好于不良生.  相似文献   

5.
数学学习困难学生的学习策略是当前教育学、心理学研究的一个热点问题。通过对学困生策略提示前后应用题学习成绩的差异研究发现:学困生不能像学优生那样自觉主动地使用相应的策略,应用策略的意识较差;策略提示对学困生有积极的促进作用;策略提示前学困生与学优生的成绩有非常显著的差异,而在策略提示后,这种差异明显减小,但学困生在策略的迁移及运用策略的有效性方面仍不如学优生。  相似文献   

6.
《考试周刊》2019,(29):156-157
通过对学生的口语报告结果分析高中生化学问题解决的思维过程,比较学困生和学优生解决问题的思维差异,基于元认知能力提出三条转化策略:优化整体认知结构、提高元认知体验、增强自我反思能力。  相似文献   

7.
以小学四年级、初中一年级和高中一年级学生为被试,采用GNAT实验范式,比较了不同年级学困生与学优生数学学习内隐态度的特点.结果发现:(1)不同年级学生的数学学习内隐态度存在显著的年级差异:不同年级学生的d'值和反应时差异显著;学生在不同组合类别下的d'值和反应时差异显著;不同年级学生在不同组合类别下的d'值和反应时差异显著.(2)学困生与学优生的数学学习内隐态度差异显著:学优生与学困生的d'值差异显著;不同年级的学优生与学困生的反应时差异显著.  相似文献   

8.
《中学教育》2018,(1):82-89
元认知是影响人的认识活动效率的重要而高级的认知机能。本研究通过自编"学生物理问题解决元认知监控行为检视表",对高一学生问题解决过程中的元认知监控行为进行分析,怀特图显示:学优生和学困生在元认知监控行为的"计划、调节、监察、检查、反思"五个项目的表现上都存在巨大差异;从解题前的计划到解题中的调节和监察,再到解题后的检查和反思,学生整体的元认知监控行为表现越来越差。据此,提出高一物理教学建议:教会学生知识组织的方法;提升学生的策略性知识;提高学困生的解题信念;加强自我检查的学习体验;培养学生解题后自我反思的习惯。  相似文献   

9.
为考察学优生和学困生在选择性注意加工机制——分心物抑制上的差异,本研究采用2(学优,学困)×2(探测显示中的目标物为启动显示中的分心物,探测显示中的目标物与启动显示中的分心物无关)×2(男,女)混合实验设计,用动物类和植物类16个字作为实验材料,采用负启动技术,研究学困生和学优生在负启动效应上是否有差异及通过改变指导语是否出现负启动反转现象。实验结果表明,在强调速度条件下,学优生和学困生都没有出现负启动反转现象,但在负启动效应上达到显著性的差异,而且学优生负启动量大于学困生;在强调正确率条件下,学优生和学困生在负启动效应上出现显著性差异;在强调正确率条件下,男女生在负启动效应上具有性别差异,并且男生出现负启动反转效应。  相似文献   

10.
《中学教育》2018,(2):73-79
为探讨不同标记策略对学习困难生(简称学困生)阅读成绩的影响,本研究采用实验法,选择54名学困生与学优生参与实验。结果表明:1)学优生的阅读成绩要高于学困生;2)组织结构图标记的阅读成绩显著高于其它两种标记;3)在纯文本与关键项标记两水平上,学优生阅读成绩显著高于学困生;在组织结构图标记水平上,学优生阅读成绩与学困生不存在显著性差异;4)在学困生水平上,短篇文章阅读成绩显著高于中、长篇,中篇文章阅读成绩显著高于长篇;而在学优生水平上,短篇与中篇文章阅读成绩不存在显著性差异,且二者阅读理解成绩显著高于长篇文章。结论:组织结构图标记可提高学习困难生的阅读成绩。  相似文献   

11.
The present study investigates the differential effects of cooperative-learning with or without metacognitive instruction on lower and higher achievers' solutions of mathematical authentic tasks. Participants were 91 seventh graders who studied in three classrooms. Data were analyzed by using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results indicated that students who were exposed to the metacognitive instruction within cooperative learning (COOP+META) significantly outperformed their counterparts who were exposed to cooperative learning with no metacognitive instruction (COOP). The positive effects of COOP+META were observed on both authentic and standard tasks. In addition, the findings show the positive effects of COOP+META method on lower and higher achievers. The practical implications of the study are discussed.This revised version was published online in September 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.  相似文献   

12.
This paper presents a study on mathematical problem solving in third-grade pupils. The relationship between mathematics, metacognition and intelligence was investigated in children with (n = 191) and without mathematical learning disabilities (n = 268). A significant relationship was found between prediction, evaluation, intelligence, procedural and mathematical fact retrieval skills in children without mathematical learning disabilities. In the children with mathematical learning disabilities a relationship was found between metacognitive and procedural skills. No such relationship was found between intelligence and metacognition or between metacognition and mathematical fact retrieval skills. In addition it was investigated if children with mathematical learning disabilities had less adequate metacognitive skills than peers without learning problems. At group level significant differences were found between both groups. However on analyzing these results further, it was found that four out of five children with combined mathematical learning disabilities, half of the children with procedural disabilities and only 5% of the children with a retrieval deficiency had low metacognitive skills. Furthermore, metacognitive problems were found in one out of five children without learning disabilities. Moreover, a majority of the children with mathematical learning disabilities and inadequate metacognitive skills had problems with prediction and evaluation skills. Most third graders with low metacognitive skills only appeared to have problems predicting the level of difficulty of tasks. Inaccurate evaluations were found on a more regular basis in children with mathematical learning disabilities and inadequate metacognitive skills as opposed to the sample of children with inadequate metacognitive skills but without learning difficulties, where their occurrence was rather a one off. The implications of this study for diagnosis and treatment will be discussed later in this paper.  相似文献   

13.
Open distance students differ in their preparedness for higher education studies. Students who are less self-regulated risk failure and drop out in the challenging milieu of open distance learning. In this study, the differences between the application of self-regulated learning strategies by low and high achievers were explored. A multi-method research design was applied. Quantitative data were statistically analysed by factor analysis (n = 246) and effect sizes. Medium to small effect sizes were found in quantitative data. Qualitative data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews. Low achievers rated their self-regulatory behaviour higher than high achievers, yet qualitative data revealed that high achievers are more self-regulated. The value of this research lies in the identification of low achievers’ use of self-regulated learning, and recognising the need to create awareness of the self-regulated learning skills necessary to support these students.  相似文献   

14.
The present paper investigates differences in the process of mastering the four basic arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication and division) between Flemish and Chinese children from Grade 3 till Grade 6 (i.e. from 8 to 11 years old). The results showed, firstly, that Chinese students outperformed Flemish students in each grade but that difference in addition, subtraction and division skills between the groups decreased as grade increased. Secondly, the levels of mastery of the four skills varied between Chinese and Flemish students. Multiplication was relatively easier for Chinese students than for their Flemish peers as compared to the other skills (that is, the gap was larger). Third, low achievers experienced comparable learning difficulties in both countries, and higher achievers demonstrated their greater ability early on.  相似文献   

15.
Constructivist ideas have influenced recent major innovations in Dutch secondary education and new curricula for reading and math in primary education, for example, pay much more attention to metacognition than before. In our study, we compared the growth of student metacognition in varying learning environments, direct instruction, and cognitive apprenticeship in primary school. The study also included a control group of teachers. In order to measure metacognition we developed a questionnaire, with separate parts for metacognitive skills and metacognitive knowledge. In the item selection procedure we made use of item response modeling. It was found that in the direct instruction and the cognitive apprenticeship group the pupils had higher scores on metacognitive skills and metacognitive knowledge compared to the control group pupils. No clear differences were found between direct instruction and cognitive apprenticeship. Interactions of learning environment and student intelligence were non-significant for both output measures.  相似文献   

16.
This multi-phase study examined the influence of retrieval processes on children??s metacognitive processes in relation to and in interaction with achievement level and age. First, N?=?150 9/10- and 11/12-year old high and low achievers watched an educational film and predicted their test performance. Children then solved a cloze test regarding the film content including answerable and unanswerable items and gave confidence judgments to every answer. Finally, children withdrew answers that they believed to be incorrect. All children showed adequate metacognitive processes before and during test taking with 11/12- year-olds outperforming 9/10-year-olds when considering characteristics of on-going retrieval processes. As to the influence of achievement level, high compared to low achievers proved to be more accurate in their metacognitive monitoring and controlling. Results suggest that both cognitive resources (operationalized through achievement level) and mnemonic experience (assessed through age) fuel metacognitive development. Nevertheless, when facing higher demands regarding retrieval processes, experience seems to play the more important role.  相似文献   

17.
This study investigated whether different groups of test-takers vary in their reported test-taking behaviour in a high-stakes test situation. A between-group design (N = 1129) was used to examine whether high and low achievers, as well as females and males, differ in their use of test-taking strategies, and in level of reported test anxiety and motivation. The results showed differences between high and low achievers on a number of test-taking strategies, where high achievers reported using successful strategies to a higher extent. There were also gender differences: females, for example, reported using random guessing to a higher extent than males. Further, low achievers, especially females, reported significantly higher levels of test anxiety than high achievers, and high achievers reported slightly higher levels of motivation when compared to low achievers. To conclude, test-taking behaviour might bring additional variance to test scores, whether or not this is irrelevant variance is discussed.  相似文献   

18.
An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of metacognitive instruction on mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics of low mathematics achievers at a middle school in the North‐West Province of South Africa. Forty standard (std) 7 pupils were identified whose non‐verbal general ability and previous mathematics achievements were significantly lower than those of other std 7 pupils. These subjects were randomly assigned to an experimental group and a control group. Metacognitive strategies in solving mathematical problems related to four mathematics topics were individually taught to the members of the experimental group, while the pupils in the control group were taught the four mathematics topics through the conventional method of teaching mathematics. The comparisons of pretest and posttest measures of general ability, metacognitive awareness, attitude towards mathematics, and mathematics achievement revealed that the posttest scores of all the four variables for the experimental group were significantly higher than those for the control group.  相似文献   

19.
对顺德职业技术学院173名大学英语学习者的元认知策略使用情况的调查表明.学生不经常使用这些策略。自我管理、注意力安排、目标与计划和自我监控与学习成绩显著相关,其中高分组和低分组在使用目标与计划、注意力安排、自我管理和自我监控策略方面有差异。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号