共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
科技文章题名的修改及制作 总被引：9，自引：3，他引：6
以科技期刊中不准确和不规范的文章题名为例,阐述科技文章题名的重要性及其要求,提出修改科技文章题名时应注意的几个方面和一些常用的修改方法. 相似文献
2.
采用单纯随机抽样的方法,从我国各省、直辖市卫生行政部门主管及中华医学会主办的临床医学期刊中随机抽取10种,对其2013年2月-2014年4月出版的期刊所刊载的全部论文进行核查,找出存在问题的题名并做分析.题名中存在的主要问题归纳为7个方面:题名与论文内容不符,题名过大,题名繁琐,题名语法结构不合理,题名用词不当,题名成分残缺,题名中使用了非公知公用的缩略语、字符或代号.列举具有代表性的问题题名,并进行了分析和修改. 相似文献
3.
4.
李秀梅 《图书馆工作与研究》2012,(8):65-67
并列题名是"题名与责任说明项"的重要组成部分。文章明确了并列题名的认定标准和依据,并通过对并列题名内涵和外延的分析,指出了当前认定并列题名过程中存在的问题。为尽量减少对并列题名认定的干扰,文章还提出了"代并列题名"的概念。 相似文献
5.
科技文章题名冗余词的处理 总被引：11，自引：1，他引：10
科技文章是关于科学技术历史、发展、研究、管理、成果推广等方面的文章。科技文章的题名是科技文章的眼睛和窗户。题名是否科学、简洁、恰当,关系着能否吸引广大科技人员,发挥论文的社会作用问题。科技文章的题名应做到确切、恰当、鲜明、简短,符合准确得体、恰如其分、简短精炼、高度概括、外延和内涵要恰当、立场观点要明确等要求。题名中切忌使用与主题无关或关系不大的词,以免题名冗长。同时也应避免题名过分笼统,以致无法反映文章的主题特色。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
哪些因素会影响学术论文的被引次数是文献计量学领域的一个经典研究议题。目前的研究主要关注论文的内容特征和形式特征与被引次数之间的关系,鲜有研究从文本可读性视角切入这一议题。文本可读性影响读者对文本内容的理解和知识吸收,是一个关乎知识传播效率和研究成果认可度的重要因素。本研究在控制论文知识品质和权威性的基础上,使用文本可读性R值等五个变量研究论文的文本可读性对被引次数的影响。以中文图书情报学知名期刊发表于2016—2020年的论文为研究样本,研究发现论文的文本可读性R值、是否采用复合式标题、是否使用公式和表格对被引次数有显著影响,而是否使用图对被引次数没有显著影响。研究验证了中文情境下文本可读性对论文影响力的实质性作用,研究结果对科研人员改善自身的中文学术写作以及提高研究成果影响力具有重要参考价值。 相似文献
12.
在多媒体发展迅速和国内外学术期刊稿源竞争加剧的情势下,重视和发挥学术期刊的新闻属性,强化新闻报道是提升杂志知名度和吸引力、促进学术期刊新发展的有效途径之一;传播科学知识,提高国民科学素质是我国学术期刊不可推卸的责任,也有利于增强学术期刊的可读性。文章探讨强化学术期刊新闻报道和科普作用的必要性及措施,以期为学术期刊界带来一些有益的思考。 相似文献
13.
This study assesses whether eleven factors associate with higher impact research: individual, institutional and international collaboration; journal and reference impacts; abstract readability; reference and keyword totals; paper, abstract and title lengths. Authors may have some control over these factors and hence this information may help them to conduct and publish higher impact research. These factors have been previously researched but with partially conflicting findings. A simultaneous assessment of these eleven factors for Biology and Biochemistry, Chemistry and Social Sciences used a single negative binomial-logit hurdle model estimating the percentage change in the mean citation counts per unit of increase or decrease in the predictor variables. The journal Impact Factor was found to significantly associate with increased citations in all three areas. The impact and the number of cited references and their average citation impact also significantly associate with higher article citation impact. Individual and international teamwork give a citation advantage in Biology and Biochemistry and Chemistry but inter-institutional teamwork is not important in any of the three subject areas. Abstract readability is also not significant or of no practical significance. Among the article size features, abstract length significantly associates with increased citations but the number of keywords, title length and paper length are insignificant or of no practical significance. In summary, at least some aspects of collaboration, journal and document properties significantly associate with higher citations. The results provide new and particularly strong statistical evidence that the authors should consider publishing in high impact journals, ensure that they do not omit relevant references, engage in the widest possible team working, when appropriate, and write extensive abstracts. A new finding is that whilst is seems to be useful to collaborate and to collaborate internationally, there seems to be no particular need to collaborate with other institutions within the same country. 相似文献
14.
通过对居民健康素养现状的分析,探讨如何进行医学科普期刊内容和形式上的策划,提高其可读性,以满足不同人群的医疗卫生需求. 相似文献
15.
《Communication Teacher》2013,27(4):246-255
More research is needed that examines textbooks intended for the entry level college classroom. This study offers valuable information to academics that adopt a public speaking textbook for instruction as well as objective feedback to the collective authors. Readability levels of 22 nationally published textbooks, based on McGlaughlin's (1969) SMOG readability index, are reported. The mean readability level for all textbooks combined equated to a (M= 15.66) grade level with a SD (.71) less than one grade level of difficulty and a range of 2.83 grade levels. It should be noted that the SMOG index is based on 100% reader comprehension and tends to rate difficulty two grade levels higher than comparable measures. An ANOVA and corresponding t-tests indicate significant differences with respect to the readability among texts. Implications of findings, limitations of this study, recommendations for teachers, and directions for future research are provided. 相似文献
16.
Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi Yasser Khazaal Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2021,109(1):75
Objective:There are concerns about nonscientific and/or unclear information on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that is available on the Internet. Furthermore, people''s ability to understand health information varies and depends on their skills in reading and interpreting information. This study aims to evaluate the readability and creditability of websites with COVID-19-related information.Methods:The search terms “coronavirus,” “COVID,” and “COVID-19” were input into Google. The websites of the first thirty results for each search term were evaluated in terms of their credibility and readability using the Health On the Net Foundation code of conduct (HONcode) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Gunning Fog, and Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRE) scales, respectively.Results:The readability of COVID-19-related health information on websites was suitable for high school graduates or college students and, thus, was far above the recommended readability level. Most websites that were examined (87.2%) had not been officially certified by HONcode. There was no significant difference in the readability scores of websites with and without HONcode certification.Conclusion:These results suggest that organizations should improve the readability of their websites and provide information that more people can understand. This could lead to greater health literacy, less health anxiety, and the provision of better preventive information about the disease.Open in a separate windowSaeideh Valizadeh-Haghi 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
Catherine J. Gray 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(2):194-205
Readability assessments of works cited in freshmen informative and argumentative speeches were performed with the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level and Flesch Reading Ease assessment tools available in Microsoft Word. Students selected their sources independently, and their sources were grouped as journals, magazines and newspapers, and websites, which were then subdivided by domain type. The wide range of readability scores in sources cited in freshman speeches raises questions related to college freshmen's reading abilities and how that affects student's selection of sources when performing research for class assignments. 相似文献
20.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(4):391-412
A qualitative study of the Maureen and Mike Mansfield Library's Web site identified the ways in which students and faculty of the University of Montana used the site for research purposes. This study employed open-ended interview questions and observations to spontaneously capture a user's experience in researching topics in which they specialized. Four thematic recommendations emerged from nine study participants: increase the readability and consistency of the library's Web site, provide research guidance and ease of navigation, offer task-based services that maximize technology, and enable customization. The study led to Web site modifications and a formalized process by which the library will approach subsequent Web site design. 相似文献