共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 218 毫秒
1.
科技论文摘要的首因效应是一种先入为主的心理现象.编辑通过摘要的质量判定论文的学术水平,读者通过摘要的阅读决定是否对论文进行检索、引用;国际重要检索系统以英文摘要的质量决定是否收录全文.我国科技论文摘要中首因效应缺失的主要原因是作者缺少摘要的撰写知识,审稿专家对摘要的审核把关不严,编辑对摘要的重要性认识不到位.提升科技论文摘要的首因效应需要加强科技论文写作的培训,提高作者撰写摘要的能力和水平;审稿专家明确摘要的评审意见,指导作者撰写合格摘要;编辑人员重视摘要的重要性,提高编辑加工摘要的能力. 相似文献
2.
3.
强调了英文摘要在科技论文中的重要作用,着重探讨了科技论文中英文摘要的形式,结构和内容.对英文摘要的撰写和编辑提供了一些有益的建议和应注意的问题. 相似文献
4.
着重论述了科技论文中文摘要,编辑.摘要的四大要素目的,方法,结果,结论.结合当前存在的五方面问题,讨论了改进方法. 相似文献
5.
强调了英文摘要在科技论文中的重要作用,着重探讨了科技论文中英文摘摘要的撰写和编辑提供了一些有益的建议和应要的形式,结构和内容.作者对英文注意的问题. 相似文献
6.
强调了英文摘要在科技论文中的重要作用,着重探讨了科技论文中英文摘摘要的撰写和编辑提供了一些有益的建议和应要的形式,结构和内容.作者对英文注意的问题. 相似文献
7.
基于技术保护目的,学术期刊论文作者对论文中涉及的科技信息选择不完全公开。本文借助信息不对称和信息博弈论的有关思想,研究学术期刊论文科技信息不完全公开的原因和种种表现,分析其对期刊质量的影响,并对科技期刊编辑面临的挑战和对策进行探讨。 相似文献
8.
9.
神经网络机器翻译的发展为作者英译科技论文摘要提供了便利,也丰富了科技期刊英文编辑的工作内涵。通过借鉴(GB/T 40036—2021)《翻译服务 机器翻译结果的译后编辑要求》中对机器翻译译后编辑类型、任务及目标等相关问题的界定来探讨机译英文摘要的编辑加工方法不失为一次全新而有益的尝试。本文辨析了作者、编辑进行机译英文摘要译后编辑的不同类型,阐述了编辑层面的译后编辑任务分解流程,归纳了机译英文摘要的常见错误类型,探讨了与摘要内容相适应的译后编辑策略,并认为编辑应坚守人机互动翻译模式中的主导地位。 相似文献
10.
利用EI数据库提高科技论文英文摘要质量 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
科技论文英文摘要在国际学术交流中具有重要作用,因此写好英文摘要非常重要。介绍如何利用EI Compendex提高编辑的英文水平,并阐明如何利用该数据库从结构安排、冠词、专业术语等方面对英文摘要进行编辑修改,从而更好地提升我国科技期刊英文摘要的表达质量。 相似文献
11.
[目的/意义] 自动识别项目申请书摘要中的科学要素,对于揭示科技项目中的科学知识具有重要的研究意义。这些科学要素的识别依赖于结构化项目摘要文本,然而目前结构化项目摘要语料资源匮乏,严重制约着相关研究的进一步发展。拟构建项目申请书摘要文本的语步语料集,为相关研究提供数据支撑。[方法/过程] 首先将项目摘要内容归纳为背景及问题、目标及任务、方法内容、价值意义4种语步类型,总结每个语步结构中出现的标志性特征并制定语步标注规范;其次相继利用基于规则和基于深度学习的方法辅助人工进行项目摘要的语步结构标注,并对每轮标注后的语料进行质量评估。[结果/结论] 两种方法共计标注近25 000条语句,语料标注的一致性系数达到0.983 9,表明该语料集基本能够区分项目摘要内的不同语步结构,初步达到了语料库建设的基本要求。 相似文献
12.
The present formatting and content of abstracts in educational research might be one barrier preventing wider dissemination and use of such research. Structured abstracts, with specific formatting and content requirements, might help researchers disseminate their work more effectively and efficiently. The purpose of this study was to investigate 2 years of abstracts of empirical research articles submitted to Research in the Schools and to determine the extent to which the abstracts were underdeveloped, thereby suggesting the need for structured abstracts. Of the 74 articles reviewed, 35 (44.3%) contained an underdeveloped abstract. Articles with underdeveloped abstracts were approximately twice as likely to be rejected than were articles with developed abstracts. Finally, 34.3% of the articles contained information in the abstract (e.g., purpose statement, sample size, findings) that was inconsistent with information provided elsewhere in the article. 相似文献
13.
Current findings from research on structured abstracts. 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
James Hartley 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2004,92(3):368-371
BACKGROUND: Structured abstracts were introduced into medical research journals in the mid 1980s. Since then they have been widely used in this and other contexts. AIM: The aim of this paper is to summarize the main findings from research on structured abstracts and to discuss the limitations of some aspects of this research. METHOD: A narrative literature review of all of the relevant papers known to the author was conducted. RESULTS: Structured abstracts are typically longer than traditional ones, but they are also judged to be more informative and accessible. Authors and readers also judge them to be more useful than traditional abstracts. However, not all studies use "real-life" published examples from different authors in their work, and more work needs to be done in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings generally support the notion that structured abstracts can be profitably introduced into research journals. Some arguments for this, however, have more research support than others. 相似文献
14.
Daniel A. Blair Peter J. Hughes Thomas W. Woolley Jr. 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2014,102(2):110-114
The purpose of this research was to determine the proportion of abstracts in pharmacy journals that are prepared according to the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria for abstracts. Certain abstracts for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) indexed in PubMed were eligible for inclusion, with the primary endpoint being median overall compliance to CONSORT recommendations for abstracts. A total of 63 RCT abstracts were included in the analysis, with only 56% of the recommended CONSORT items represented in the sample. It is recommended that pharmacy journals encourage authors to follow CONSORT recommendations for abstracts when submitting RCTs for publication. 相似文献
15.
Hartley J 《Bulletin of the Medical Library Association》2000,88(4):332-337
BACKGROUND: There is a small body of research on improving the clarity of abstracts in general that is relevant to improving the clarity of abstracts of systematic reviews. OBJECTIVES: To summarize this earlier research and indicate its implications for writing the abstracts of systematic reviews. METHOD: Literature review with commentary on three main features affecting the clarity of abstracts: their language, structure, and typographical presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The abstracts of systematic reviews should be easier to read than the abstracts of medical research articles, as they are targeted at a wider audience. The aims, methods, results, and conclusions of systematic reviews need to be presented in a consistent way to help search and retrieval. The typographic detailing of the abstracts (type-sizes, spacing, and weights) should be planned to help, rather than confuse, the reader. 相似文献
16.
17.
通过对现有知识结构划分方法的梳理,总结了当前的知识结构融合方法,用数据表明了融合文献的内容和引用特征进行知识结构划分的必要性.在此基础上,通过实验证明用最大值函数将文献的标题和摘要内容特征以及文献耦合引用特征融合进行知识结构划分的效果,并将其与现有方法进行对比.结果表明:该融合函数可以提高知识结构划分的精度. 相似文献
18.
整合科技项目所产出成果的信息能间接反映项目的研究内容,可以弥补项目查重过程中申报书难以获取的不足,具有重要的研究意义。本文提出一种整合科技项目相关产出信息的数据模型。该模型通过整合项目产出的科技报告、学术论文和科技成果等信息,抽取其中的关键词、标题和摘要等对项目的研究内容进行准确的描述,并强化了项目负责人和承担机构等辅助信息对项目查重的重要性,从而为解决项目查重问题提供客观的数据支撑。 相似文献
19.
基于被引次数的引文分析无法直接揭示论文的研究内容,利用关键词或从标题、摘要和全文中抽取的主题词很难客观反映论文的被引原因。本文以碳纳米管纤维研究领域的高被引论文为研究对象进行引文内容抽取和主题识别,经人工判读验证：基于引文内容分析的高被引论文识别的核心主题能够较好地揭示高被引论文的被引原因（引用动机）,而且与论文的研究内容相符合;与基于全文、基于标题和摘要的主题识别相比,在引文内容分析基础上识别的主题具有更好的主题代表性,能够有效揭示被引文献的研究内容,是对原文相关信息的重要补充。本文的实验表明基于引文内容分析的高被引论文主题识别是可行而且有效的。图4。表4。参考文献31。 相似文献
20.
Objectives:
This study sought to ascertain the publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Medical Library Association (MLA) for the years of 2002 and 2003. The secondary objectives were to examine possible reasons for non-publication and factors influencing publication.Methods:
A total of 442 abstracts from both meeting years, consisting of presented papers and posters, were examined. The 2 methods used to obtain a publication rate were literature searches and an online questionnaire sent to first authors. The questionnaire also asked abstract authors about reasons for non-publication and other factors that might have influenced their decisions about whether or not to submit the project for publication.Results:
The overall publication rate from the survey was 26.5%, and the publication rate found via literature searching was 27.6%. The most common reason given for non-publication was time restrictions. Also notable was the large proportion of abstracts written by librarians working at universities and those having 25 or more years in the library profession.Discussion:
Publication rates for abstracts presented at the Medical Library Association meetings for the years studied rank at the low end in comparison with other medical professional associations. Further research into factors affecting publication may reveal ways to increase this rate.Highlights
- Publication rates from posters and presentations at the Medical Library Association''s 2002 and 2003 annual meetings were estimated at less than 28.0% using data from an author survey and literature search. In contrast, a Cochrane systematic review of 79 similar biomedical research studies found a mean publication rate of 44.5%.
- Respondents listed time restrictions as their primary reason for not submitting their presentations for publication.
Implications
- Compared to biomedical conferences, relatively little of the information presented at Medical Library Association annual meetings is available as peer-reviewed evidence in the published literature.
- Each profession has different norms for the nature and style of information in presentations at meetings. The further presenters get from basic research, the more difficult it may be for them to conceptualize a presentation as a formal paper. Diverse publication rates between professions are likely to remain.
- Additional study could be aimed at further clarifying the reasons for non-publication and possible means to ameliorate them.