共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
通过简要梳理近年来国外学术出版道德建设相关的进展和经验,以及科学共同体所面临的科研不端行为、发表论文的质量参差不齐和掠夺性期刊等方面挑战,可以发现我国虽然面临许多同样的问题,但科技社团和期刊等有关方面采取的对策相对比较有限.通过参考和分析国外相关实践活动的主要特点和影响,探讨我国科技期刊如何通过编辑政策和流程的改革创新,增进与有关管理部门、科研机构和企业合作等,加强学术出版道德建设,并在促进提高科学研究质量和加强科研诚信建设方面发挥更加积极的作用. 相似文献
2.
Michel C. Atlas 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2004,92(2):242-250
Purpose: The purpose is to review the issue of retraction in the scientific literature and to examine the policies on retraction of major biomedical journals.Method: The historical background of this issue was investigated through a literature search. The Instructions to Authors of 122 major biomedical journals were reviewed for evidence of a policy on the retraction of articles. Editors of those journals with no mention of retraction in their Instructions to Authors were contacted by email and/or postal mail.Results: Sixty-two percent of the journals investigated did not post or report having a policy on issuing retractions. Only twenty-one (18%) did. The remainder did not post any policy and did not respond to inquiries.Discussion: Including policies in Instructions to Authors relating to the principled conduct of research and publication will improve the ethical environment in which the scientific community works. 相似文献
3.
Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh Muzammil Tahira A. Abrizah 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2017,33(4):421-432
Over the years, the number of journals indexed in Scopus has increased, although it varies significantly between countries. The increasing proportion of international journals of a country provides new venues for papers from that country to be seen by other researchers worldwide. In this work, we evaluate the relationship of a country’s scientific performance or publication success with both its journals’ quantity and quality. The specific objective of the study is to identify the relationship between the country’s publication success and the quantity and quality of those country’s journals indexed in Scopus during 2005–2014. The publication success of 102 individual countries, measured by their scientific productivity, impact and collaboration indicators, the quantity of country’s Scopus-indexed journals in 2014 (a total of 22,581 journals) as well as the quantity of its journals were investigated. Scopus-indexed journals are predominantly from Western Europe (48.9%) and North America (27.7%), with the United States and the United Kingdom dominate with a total 51%. The contribution from the peripheral countries is comparatively small, however there are a good number of contributions from the South-East Asian countries. Estonia is the fastest growing country in terms of having indexed journals in Scopus, following by Iran and Malaysia. Among the studied indices, it was found that publication success (total publications and total citations) of 102 countries are strongly correlated with quantity (number of indexed journals and number of documents published in indexed journals) and quality (citations per paper, SJR, h-index, CiteScore and SNIP) indicators of country’s journals. We can conclude that the scientific productivity of a country depend critically on the number of journals indexed from that country in citation databases. The study provides a context with which the relative success of publications can be assessed, yielding new insights into the scientific impact of individual countries and the performance of journals that they published. 相似文献
4.
N. Yu. Berezkina O. N. Sikorskaya G. S. Khrenova 《Scientific and Technical Information Processing》2013,40(4):190-194
This paper reviews the use of publication activity indicators for the assessment of the qualifications of scientific and teaching staff. A new section entitled The Publication Activities of Scientists in Belarus has been created on the website of the Central Science Library of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. This section includes a list of periodicals that are available for the publication of scientific results in key areas of research (based on the Web of Knowledge) and a listof Belarusian organizations that are ranked by the h-index and the number of references to their papers according to Scopus. This section also provides the editors of scientific journals with recommendations on the inclusion of citation data into global databases and other materials for researchers. 相似文献
5.
探讨日本科技期刊宏观发展与趋势，对日本科技期刊的出版模式与运行机制、法律政策环境和经济政策环境进行深入分析和研究，提出日本科技期刊发展的成功经验，以对其他国家，特别是官方语言为非英语的国家提供借鉴。 相似文献
6.
[目的/意义] 对《基于科学计量学指标的科研评价》一书进行评介,旨在为现有的科研评价体系提供借鉴。[方法/过程] 通过详读全书,查阅大量相关文献,总结本书的特点和精华。[结果/结论] 该书具有研究体系完整、研究目的明确、研究结构清晰、研究指标易于量化等特点,运用科学计量学指标和测度方法来进行科研评价,可为评价科技期刊质量以及科研管理部门制定相关政策提供参考。 相似文献
7.
This paper presents a review of publications that explore the role of editorial boards for scholarly journals. Such studies are rather limited as the role of editorial boards of scientific periodicals has not yet been fully gauged by information experts as a subject of scientometric research. However, the study of the publication activities, as well as the geographic, linguistic, and gender distribution of editorial-board members offers a new perspective on several issues of relevance to scientometrics. Such issues include the assessment of research performance at the country, organizational, or research-group level; research and publication ethics; journal quality; and internationalization of a scientific discipline. 相似文献
8.
日本科技期刊运行机制和发展环境研究 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
研究日本科技期刊的出版模式与运行机制,以及法律政策环境和经济政策环境.认为日本科技期刊发展的成功经验,对许多国家,特别是官方语言为非英语的国家,有一定的可借鉴性. 相似文献
9.
N. Yu. Berezkina 《Scientific and Technical Information Processing》2017,44(2):153-158
This paper considers the use of bibliometric methods in library and information activities, as well as the role of libraries of the Republic of Belarus in increasing the publication activities of researchers and the promotion of scientific journals. 相似文献
10.
11.
Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain
Remedios Melero Juan-José Boté-Vericad Alexandre López-Borrull 《Learned Publishing》2023,36(2):178-193
Pillars of open science are often included within the editorial policies of scholarly journals, including policies on open access publication, availability of underlying research data, preprints and open peer review. The aim of this paper is to examine and analyse perceptions and editorial practices related to open access, preprints, open research data and open peer review, from the perspective of editors of scientific journals published in Spain, to gain an insight into editorial policies related to open science. Results and data were obtained by a combined method of online interviews and an online questionnaire. The online survey was sent to editors from journals indexed in the Dulcinea directory, which at the time of the study included 1875 academic journals. A total of 420 responses (22.4%) were obtained. The results indicated that 92% of the journals were open access journals, 2% of the journals conducted open peer review, 15% of the journals had instructions to allow archiving preprints, and out of 375 responses, only 59 journals (16%) reported having a policy on underlying research data. Based on these results, there is a trend in favour of open access, but the perceived barriers to open peer review outweighed the advantages. There is also some reluctance to allow preprints to be made available. This concern might be because editors want authors and readers to read and cite the contents published in their journals, rather than their preprint versions. 相似文献
12.
学术期刊影响力评价方法研究进展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
[目的/意义]期刊影响力评价是科学计量学研究的重要组成部分和应用领域,对于优化期刊质量、促进科学交流具有重要意义。[方法/过程]综述国内外期刊影响力评价方法研究进展,从传统指标、影响因子系列评价指标、H指数以及衍生指标、类PageRank及其衍生指标、基于多因素综合评价方法、基于社交媒体的期刊影响力评价指标以及跨学科期刊评价方法出发,总结现有学术期刊影响力评价方法的特征及其不足之处。[结果/结论]现有评价指标融合度较差,较少考虑引文偏态与自引问题,且新兴的基于社交媒体的评价方法可行性有待商榷。未来应重视深度融合评价指标,引文偏态改进方法多样化,社交媒体期刊评价方法规范化以及跨领域期刊评价方法体系化。 相似文献
13.
14.
随着生物医学领域文献发表量的快速增加,撤稿量也随之增加。本文通过检索PubMed收录的关于中国作者发表文章的撤稿文件,对其中的信息进行提取和统计学分析。结果显示:1)生物医学领域中国作者撤稿在2005年后进入快速增长,平均撤稿时间为16.55月,撤稿主要集中在影响因子为0～3的期刊(58.9％)。2)撤稿原因分别为重复发表或抄袭(40%),科学错误(15％),作者署名或版权问题(8%),伪造数据或怀疑伪造数据(5%)。3)因科学错误、重复发表或抄袭、伪造数据或怀疑伪造数据而撤稿的期刊平均影响因子之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。4)非SCI给出不详撤稿信息的比例明显高于SCI期刊(P<0.05)。撤稿行为是对缺陷科学结论纠错的有效措施,从PubMed收录的对中国作者的撤稿声明分析中可以发现某些中国作者科学失范行为的模式,以及科技期刊编辑部对待撤稿的态度,并可借鉴经验制定出有针对性的措施,促进国内期刊出版环境的净化。 相似文献
15.
E. Z. Suleimenov 《Scientific and Technical Information Processing》2010,37(1):33-36
The purpose of the Kazakh publication citation indicator that has been developed in Kazakhstan since 2005 is to carry out
scientometric analysis of scientific publications to determine their citation rate. At present, the bibliographic database
(BDB) on citation includes information on the publication activities and citation index of approximately 30000 Kazakh scientists
and specialists. They had over 18000 scientific papers published in over 500 domestic and foreign journals. The total quantity
of references to papers by Kazakh scientists was more than 28000. The Kazakh analogue of the science citation index determination
system is an efficient tool for analytical work with the BDB of scientific publications, which makes it possible to calculate
publication activities and citation parameters, which are used to define the value and demand for the results of scientific
work in various fields of domestic science. 相似文献
16.
明确我国科技期刊可持续出版的定义和内涵,对科技期刊可持续出版的影响因素进行分类研究.采用系统工程的理论和方法,对科技期刊的影响因素进行系统分析,同时阐明这些影响因素与科技期刊可持续出版的关系.提出期刊可持续出版的实施方案,为科技期刊编辑部制订可持续出版战略决策提供理论和实践依据. 相似文献
17.
18.
高质量审稿意见不仅言之有据,对稿件全面客观评价,而且提出富有建设性的修改建议,具有很高的学术价值。从目前已刊发的情况看,高质量审稿意见按内容可分为珍贵史料型、学术争鸣型和学习借鉴型3种类型,按刊登载体模式可分为纸质刊物刊登型、纯网络版刊发型、审稿专家个人微信公众号推送型3种主要形式。选登高质量的审稿意见有利于培养稳定优秀审稿人队伍,有利于优质学术资源的共享与示范,有利于学术期刊的科研诚信建设。学术期刊可普及和推广高质量审稿意见选登,科研单位可将选登的高质量审稿意见纳入审稿人的工作业绩,全面推动学术期刊和科研工作的繁荣发展。 相似文献
19.
The open access (OA) model for journals is compared to the open source principle for computer software. Since the early 1990s nearly 1,000 OA scientific journals have emerged – mostly as voluntary community efforts, although recently some professionally operating publishers have used author charges or institutional membership. This study of OA journals without author charges shows that their impact is still relatively small, but awareness of it is increasing. The average number of research articles per year is lower than for major scientific journals but the publication times are shorter. 相似文献
20.
The launch of Google Scholar Metrics as a tool for assessing scientific journals may be serious competition for Thomson Reuters' Journal Citation Reports, and for the Scopus‐powered Scimago Journal Rank. A review of these bibliometric journal evaluation products is performed. We compare their main characteristics from different approaches: coverage, indexing policies, search and visualization, bibliometric indicators, results analysis options, economic cost, and differences in their ranking of journals. Despite its shortcomings, Google Scholar Metrics is a helpful tool for authors and editors in identifying core journals. As an increasingly useful tool for ranking scientific journals, it may also challenge established journals products. 相似文献