共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 539 毫秒
1.
国外数字图书馆可用性评价研究综述 总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12
马翠嫦 《现代图书情报技术》2007,2(2):1-6
总结国外对于数字图书馆可用性评价的总体研究概况，数字图书馆可用性评价的理论研究和数字图书馆可用性测试的报告，以及数字图书馆可用性评价研究中的几个热点问题；对数字图书馆可用性评价方法进行归类；提出国外数字图书馆可用性评价的特点和对我国相关研究的启示。 相似文献
2.
数字图书馆可用性评价应关注的几个问题 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
我国数字图书馆建设已经进入快速发展的时期,有必要对数字图书馆的可用性进行科学评价,以进一步提高数字图书馆建设水平。目前的数字图书馆可用性评价在方法、指标、具体实践等方面都存在一些问题,今后的数字图书馆可用性评价将呈现出一些新的特点。参考文献12。 相似文献
3.
将信息搜寻的4种模式引入数字图书馆可用性评价中,构建基于用户信息搜寻模式的数字图书馆可用性评价指标体系,通过两种难度级别的搜索实验、浏览实验和追踪实验以及问卷调查,获取用户利用数字图书馆资源的信息搜寻行为数据,从而实施数字图书馆可用性评价。 相似文献
4.
数字图书馆的可用性研究 总被引：26，自引：3，他引：23
本文在讨论数字图书馆可用性的概念及其意义的基础上，着重探讨了评价数字图书馆可用性的原则和内容，并提出了增强数字图书馆可用性的一些看法。 相似文献
5.
介绍远程可用性评价的类型和优缺点,总结远程可用性评价的一般过程,对比分析较有代表性的软件,针对远程可用性评价在数字图书馆评价中的应用现状,提出促进数字图书馆远程可用性评价发展的相关建议。 相似文献
6.
数字图书馆可用性评价模式研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
评价模式是数字图书馆可用性评价的总体框架,涉及评价的目的、视角、理论和方法等方面。数字图书馆可用性的评价模式有多种,常见的有以系统为中心的模式、以任务为中心的模式、以用户为中心的模式、审美模式和人类学模式,对之进行实证性介绍和分析,有助于今后数字图书馆可用性评价模式的科学选择。图1。参考文献16。 相似文献
7.
本研究利用实验研究方法,探讨用户个体差异对数字图书馆可用性评价的影响.该实验在美国罗格斯,新泽西州立大学传播与信息学院的人机交互实验室开展.35位实验参加人员分别在三个数字图书馆中完成了两项实验任务.结果表明,用户个体差异一定程度上影响了他们对数字图书馆可用性评估,尤其是对浏览功能 (browsing) 的评价.在考察的几种个体差异中,用户的教育背景、性别、浏览技能、搜索技能和浏览经验不同程度地影响了用户对三个数字图书馆可用性评价的不同方面.本研究有助于改善数字图书馆的个性化设计. 相似文献
8.
数字图书馆可用性评价研究综述 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
对近二十年来数字图书馆可用性评价研究的成果进行归纳总结,从数字图书馆可用性的概念、评价指标、评价方法三个方面展开评述,指出存在的问题,提供发展建议。表1。参考文献27。 相似文献
9.
数字图书馆评价标准的研究有待于进一步深入.文章作者对用户评价数字图书馆的标准进行了调查分析,结果表明:可用性、馆藏质量、网络通信能力及系统性能、服务质量是用户评价数字图书馆的关键标准. 相似文献
10.
11.
数字图书馆门户可用性评估指标体系 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
文章分析了数字图书馆门户及可用性的含义,在此基础上,从有效性、效率和用户满意度三个方面构建了一个数字图书馆门户可用性评估指标体系。 相似文献
12.
《Library & information science research》2006,28(3):433-452
Digital library research has developed over the past decade, but little has been done on the identification of evaluation criteria, especially from users' perspectives. This article identifies users' criteria and applies them to the evaluation of existing digital libraries. Forty-eight subjects were instructed to develop and justify a set of essential criteria for the evaluation of digital libraries. At the same time, they were requested to evaluate existing digital libraries by applying the criteria that they were developing. A compilation of criteria developed by participants show that usability and collection quality were the most important criteria for evaluating digital libraries. Service quality, system performance efficiency, and user opinion solicitation were also deemed essential criteria. The author further compares digital library evaluation criteria identified by users and researchers and applied in previous research. The article reveals problems in current digital library design and development, discusses suggestions for improving digital library design, and presents areas for further research. 相似文献
13.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(4):384-403
Professional literature about the assessment of digital libraries reflects a growing interest in both improving the user experience and in justifying the creation of digital collections to multiple stakeholders. This article explores some of the key themes in digital library assessment literature through a review of current literature (2004–14) gathered from both scholarly and popular resources online. The majority of scholarship about digital library assessment utilizes usability testing and Web statistics for data collection, while studies about altmetrics, the reuse of digital library materials, cost benefit analysis, and the holistic evaluation of digital libraries are also present in the literature. Exploring the literature about digital library assessment allows libraries to create effective and sustainable evaluation models based on the successes and shortcomings of previously completed projects. 相似文献
14.
In this paper the authors present a preliminary discussion on some of the results from a survey aimed to explore, describe and explain some of the usability characteristics in digital libraries evaluation in the Mexican context. The study is framed in the evaluation of a multinational and monolingual digital library: the Miguel de Cervantes Virtual Library, from the University of Alicante in Spain. The evaluators were Mexican “expert” users (i.e. Spanish-speaking professional university librarians specialized in electronic reference services) who were asked to carry on an evaluation instrument based on usability criteria as taken from some models in developed countries. Some questions that might be answered with future research are outlined in this paper. 相似文献
15.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(2-3):339-379
ABSTRACT Digital libraries and collections are a growing facet of today's traditional library. Digital library technologies have become increasingly more sophisticated in the effort to provide more and better access to the collections they contain. The evaluation of the usability of these technologies has not kept pace with technological developments, however, and the end-user has in some cases been left behind. This research study evaluates the usability of digital collections created using the CONTENTdm Digital Collection Management System, a software system used by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Specifically, this study addresses the following questions: Does CONTENTdm meet users' needs? Is the interface sufficiently intuitive for them to use it? Is the experience of exploring digital collections using CONTENTdm satisfying to users? Employing usability testing techniques with actual-end users, this study attempts to assess the efficacy of the CONTENTdm public interface as well as user attitudes toward it. Ten participants from three user groups—faculty, library science graduate students, and the general public—performed eleven tasks designed to test the key functions of CONTENTdm-created collections and then answered a series of questions about their experiences. Key findings from this study indicate that while the included digital collections are useful and desirable to end-users, the interface generated by CONTENTdm can be confusing even for those who have considerable experience using the Internet. Results from this study may be used to improve this software system and add to the literature surrounding the usability of digital libraries in general. 相似文献
16.
公共图书馆网站信息构建可用性评价研究 总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12
赵宇翔 《现代图书情报技术》2007,2(3):60-64
在信息构建和可用性定义和关系的基础上，结合调查的16所国内较大的公共图书馆网站信息构建中存在的可用性问题，尝试性地建立一套适用于公共图书馆网站可用性评价的指标体系，并对上海图书馆网站信息构建的可用性进行实证分析和评价。 相似文献
17.
高校图书馆网站可用性评价研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
目前,国内多数高校图书馆都在Internet上建立了自己的网站,但在其实际的应用当中还无法很好地满足用户的需求.网站可用性评价是确定一个网站能否满足用户需求最基本的方法.本文在介绍网站可用性概念的前提下,分析了高校图书馆网站可用性的内涵,并从用户角度出发提出了一套评价高校图书馆网站可用性的指标体系,试图以此促进高校图书馆改进网站的设计、内容和服务功能,为不同的用户提供有效、迅速、满意的服务. 相似文献