共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 448 毫秒
1.
Millie Jackson 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):165-173
ABSTRACT Google Book Search presents an opportunity to search millions of books from the Google Library partners and publishing partners. How does metadata compare in Google Book Search and library catalogs? 相似文献
2.
ABSTRACT The Google Book Search Library Project has partnered with an array of impressive libraries, including Harvard University, the University of California System, University of Michigan, and the New York Public Library. The reasons for collaborating with Google to further book digitization are different for each library. Moreover, the exact way in which these libraries will use their own digital copies has yet to be decided for many of the libraries involved. While the Google Book Search Library Project remains controversial, the Google library partners are seizing an unprecedented opportunity to amplify the scale of their pre-existing digitization initiatives. 相似文献
3.
Gloriana St. Clair 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):151-163
ABSTRACT This paper updates three ongoing book scanning projects (Google Book Search, the Million Book Project, and the Open Content Alliance), discusses the changing paradigm for authority in scholarly work, and reflects on the barrier of copyright and how it might be overcome. 相似文献
4.
国内对Google图书搜索项目的研究进展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
从文献入手,对我国学者近年来有关Google图书搜索项目的研究进行梳理和总结,首先简要分析了此项目的中文定名,然后归纳出国内学者关注的重点是版权问题、Goosle图书搜索产生的影响和图书馆的应对等几方面,并进行评述.最后建议今后可以研究图书搜索比较分析以及图书馆参与图书搜索项目后如何进一步发展. 相似文献
5.
Robert J. Lackie MLIS 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(1):35-53
Google's initiative to scan and add book content into its search engine has resulted in much praise and protest. Changing its digitization project's name from Google Print to Google Book Search and adding information to its site did not keep Google out of copyright court. However, publicity surrounding this project has spawned renewed interest in book digitization projects, with collaborative efforts quickly growing. This article will look at Book Search's history, highlight how it has been altered along with its name, and point out other interesting book digitization projects that Book Search has spawned or recently brought into the limelight, such as those associated with the Internet Archive. 相似文献
6.
谷歌数字图书馆计划发展历程与版权问题分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
文章首先对谷歌数字图书馆计划进行简单介绍,并对图书馆计划实施至今所发生的事件进行简单历史回顾,然后分析谷歌数字图书馆计划的经济目的与文化目的,最后重点对该计划实施过程中的合理使用、"opt-out"与和解协议存在的版权法律问题进行分析,认为谷歌不能以合理使用来抗辩其行为. 相似文献
7.
This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata. 相似文献
8.
Jeffrey Beall 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1):40-53
This article critically examines four Google search products (Google Advanced Search, Google News Advanced Search, Google Books Advanced Search, and Google Advanced Scholar Search) and shows how each uses metadata to enhance or improve search results. In addition, the article shows how metadata can increase search precision and recall in information discovery systems. From a library perspective, this article analyzes some of the metadata-enabled features of Google's advanced search pages and compares these features to those found in a typical online library catalog. From a serials perspective, Google News Advanced Search demonstrates how Google indexes news websites, sites that are essentially continuing resources. As Google incorporates more and more metadata functionality into its advanced search pages, they increasingly begin to function more like online library catalogs and less like search pages found in a traditional Internet search engine. The simple search box has many limitations, and like libraries, Google is increasingly creating and offering metadata-enabled search features that improve search precision and recall in its products. 相似文献
9.
叶红卫 《现代图书情报技术》2010,26(9):90-93
将Google 图书搜索引擎嵌入到Web OPAC中,实现Web OPAC的图书预览功能,并详细介绍实现的技术思路和具体实现步骤,利用Web OPAC为用户提供更好的信息服务。 相似文献
10.
Adrienne Canino 《Public Services Quarterly》2019,15(3):248-255
This essay examines the beta tool from Google, Google Dataset Search. The Google Dataset Search, announced in September 2018, is a search engine specific to finding research data published on the internet. The structure and methods of the search engine are examined, as well as the methods Google recommends to web developers to make it an effective tool across the World Wide Web. The column concludes with a discussion of the pros and cons of this tool in the research information landscape. 相似文献
11.
Joan Giglierano 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):101-113
ABSTRACT Almost three years after Google Scholar's inception, only a third of Ohio Library and Information Network (OhioLINK) member libraries link to it from their Web sites. This article reports the results of a July 2007 survey of OhioLINK academic librarians, conducted to find out about their attitudes and current practices regarding promotion of Google Scholar. It compares the findings about placement of Google Scholar on Web sites and inclusion in library instruction with previous research, and includes recommendations for libraries about Google Scholar. 相似文献
12.
13.
《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(3-4):191-206
SUMMARY Buoyed by its brand name, Google News has grown from its beta stage into a popular news site with a significant share of the Internet market for “Current Events and Global News.” The success of Google News raises questions about the nature of news and even the desirability of Google's presenting news. Where does Google News fit into the myriad news resources available on the Internet and in libraries? How does Google News work? Is Google News an effective source for news research? How will Google News stand up to its competition, in particular a new wave of community news sites? 相似文献
14.
Robert J. Lackie 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):183-194
ABSTRACT This article considers the Google Librarian Central and the Google for Educators sites and related projects, such as The Literacy Project, from the search and advertising giant, and how libraries, schools, and others view their value and impact. 相似文献
15.
ABSTRACT Google Scholar has multiple uses as a reference tool of last resort, including citation completion, an alternative when catalogs are down, and interdisciplinary metasearching and database suggestion. During the reference desk transaction, users can be taught effective Google Scholar search techniques such as advanced search functionality and the nuances of results' groupings. In addition, reference desk interactions with Google Scholar give insight for instructional workshops. 相似文献
16.
Charlie Potter 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):5-28
ABSTRACT In order to understand better and explain the practices of Google Scholar, this essay takes a rhetorical and holistic look at the search technology, language, and sociopolitical implications of the Google Scholar interface as well as the connection between Google Scholar and the actions of the Google Corporation. The relationship between Google Scholar and the academic library is also explored. In addition, the essay offers ways to encourage students to undertake this kind of critique in the information literacy classroom. 相似文献
17.
ABSTRACT The paper discusses and analyzes the coverage of scientific serials in Google Scholar (GS). The focus is on an exploratory study. The study shows deficiencies in the coverage and up-to-dateness of the GS index. Furthermore, the study points up which Web servers are the most important data providers for this search service and which information sources are highly represented. There is a relatively large gap in Google Scholar's coverage of German literature as well as weaknesses in the accessibility of Open Access content. 相似文献
18.
Ronald SNIJDER 《Learned Publishing》2010,23(4):293-301
This article describes an experiment to measure the impact of open access (OA) publishing of academic books. During a period of nine months, three sets of 100 books were disseminated through an institutional repository, the Google Book Search program, or both channels. A fourth set of 100 books was used as control group. OA publishing enhances discovery and online consultation. Within the context of the experiment, no relation could be found between OA publishing and citation rates. Contrary to expectations, OA publishing does not stimulate or diminish sales figures. The Google Book Search program is superior to the repository. 相似文献
19.
Christopher Giuliano Sean McConachie Julie Kalabalik-Hoganson 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2021,109(2):212
Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacy students’ ability to correctly answer drug information questions using Micromedex with Watson, Micromedex without Watson, or Google.Methods:This multicenter randomized trial compared pharmacy student responses to drug information questions using Micromedex with Watson, Micromedex without Watson, or Google from January to March of 2020. First- to fourth-year pharmacy students at two institutions were included. The primary outcome was the number of correct answers. Secondary outcomes were the time taken to answer the questions and differences in number of correct answers by pharmacy student year and institution.Results:The analysis included 162 participants: 52 students in the Micromedex group, 51 students in the Watson group, and 59 students in the Google group. There was a significant difference among groups in the total number of questions answered correctly (p=0.02). Post-hoc analysis revealed that participants in the Micromedex group answered more questions correctly than those in the Google group (p=0.015). There were no significant differences between Micromedex and Watson groups (p=0.52) or between Watson and Google groups (p=0.22). There was also no difference in time to complete the questions among groups (p=0.72).Conclusion:Utilizing Google did not save students time and led to more incorrect answers. These findings suggest that health care educators and health sciences librarians should further reinforce training on the appropriate use of drug information resources. 相似文献
20.
胡远玲 《大学图书情报学刊》2004,22(3):47-49
搜索引擎之王Google开放了它的查询接口,可以让全世界各地的程序员有限免费地以WehService的方式,对Google下查找指令,并且将结果用于自己的程序或网页中,给程序员带来了极大的方便。章介绍了Google API在Delphi中的使用,并给出了详细的Delphi程序。 相似文献