共查询到16条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
论文在概述网络百科全书的概念、类型及发展概况的基础上,分析总结了网络百科全书发展的六大趋势：合作化、集成化、系列化、多元化、智能化与“维基化”。 相似文献
2.
论文在概述网络百科全书的概念、类型及发展概况的基础上,分析总结了网络百科全书发展的六大趋势：合作化、集成化、系列化、多元化、智能化与“维基化”。 相似文献
3.
本文以不列颠百科在线与中国大百科全书网络版为样本对中外网络百科全书进行全面比较，包括版本的系列化、网站内容、检索系统、网站附加信息，以期为中文网络百科全书的发展提供借鉴。 相似文献
4.
5.
网络百科全书的发展及其意义 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
介绍了网络百科全书的发展历史,并结合网络百科全书和传统印刷本百科全书的发展状况,论述了网络给百科全书的编辑技术、管理等方面带来的深远影响。 相似文献
6.
网络百科用户贡献行为研究综述 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
介绍网络百科这种新型知识组织形式的发展现状,总结网络百科用户及其贡献行为的基本特点。从贡献行为特征、贡献行为影响因素和用户协作三个方面对网络百科用户贡献行为研究进行综述,总结目前研究的成果,并指出不足之处。最后提出未来研究可能的发展方向,特别指出信息计量学与复杂系统理论将在这一主题的研究中发挥巨大作用。 相似文献
7.
编纂百科全书是一项复杂艰巨的系统性工程,对作者和编辑的要求都很高.对于百科编辑来说,百科意识是一种习惯成自然的职业本能.本文以作者参编的《中国大百科全书》第三版为例,从框架意识、条目意识、体例意识、平衡意识四个方面对百科全书编撰中编辑的百科意识进行阐述,强调了百科意识对于百科全书编纂的重要性,是百科全书编辑必备的基本素养. 相似文献
8.
网络百科全书是随着Web2.0技术的发展而出现的新的知识创造和传播方式。网络百科全书的成功依赖于广大用户的积极参与和贡献。本研究从网络百科系统管理的角度分析如何促进社区成员的知识贡献。基于组织行为学理论,建立了网络百科社区管理机制同成员参与行为关系的理论模型,并进行了实证研究。研究结果表明社区成员对网络百科系统的社区认同和义务,以及网络百科社区的百科协议和编辑原则、优质词条的评选及积分和等级制度对成员的知识贡献有着显著的影响。 相似文献
9.
地图是百科全书不可或缺的组成部分,其目的是为所配条目作相应的补充,为那些涉及空间概念的条目提供直观、丰富的图示说明。文章以《中国大百科全书》为例,从百科全书配置地图的专业特征、百科地图的设计等方面阐述如何编制百科地图,使之更好地服务于百科全书。 相似文献
10.
11.
[目的/意义]在线百科主题覆盖面和用户范围非常广泛,不同的学科领域及不同类型的用户对应着不同的需求和利用模式,因此需要从研究人员对在线百科的引用特征和引用类型出发,深入分析在线百科的用户需求和利用特征。[方法/过程]以我国图书情报学领域（以下简称“图情领域”）期刊论文为研究对象,从引用在线百科资源的论文数量及引文数量、时间分布、主题分布、期刊分布、机构分布、作者分布、文献类型、引用类型等多个指标,探析图情领域期刊论文在线百科的利用特征与规律。[结果/结论]结果表明,在我国图情领域学术研究过程对在线百科资源具有较高的依赖性,引用在线百科的期刊论文研究主题集中在图书馆、当下流行的信息技术和概念等相关方面,以非实证性研究居多,引用频次较高的期刊和机构主要是排名靠前的核心期刊和高校,引用较多的作者群体多为女性作者和实践工作者,引用类型依次为对非图情专业术语的引用、图情专业术语的引用以及网站和词条本身的引用。最后从在线百科词条质量和信息聚合两个角度对这一现象和特征进行讨论。 相似文献
12.
13.
Angela Doucet Rand 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(7-8):923-932
ABSTRACT Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The encyclopedia is openly edited by registered users. Wikipedia editors can edit their own and others' entries, and some abuse of this editorial power has been unveiled. Content authors have also been criticized for publishing less than accurate content. Educators and students acknowledge casual use of Wikipedia in spite of its perceived inaccuracies. Use of the online encyclopedia as a reference resource in scholarly papers is still debated. The increasing popularity of Wikipedia has led to an influx of research articles analyzing the validity and content of the encyclopedia. This study provides an analysis of relevant articles on academic use of Wikipedia. This analysis attempts to summarize the status of Wikipedia in relation to the scope (breadth) and depth of its contents and looks at content validity issues that are of concern to the use of Wikipedia for higher education. The study seeks to establish a reference point from which educators can make informed decisions about scholarly use of Wikipedia as a reference resource. 相似文献
14.
The collaboratively edited online encyclopedia Wikipedia is among the most popular websites in the world. Subsequently, it poses a great challenge to traditional encyclopedias, which for centuries have set the standards of society's knowledge with their printed editions. It is, therefore, important to study the impact of social media on the standards of our knowledge. This longitudinal panel study analyzed the framing of content in encyclopedia entries of top Fortune companies in Wikipedia and the online version of Encyclopedia Britannica in 2006, 2008, and 2010. Content analyses of the length, tonality, and topics of 3,985 sentences showed that Wikipedia entries were significantly longer, were more positively and negatively framed, and focused more on corporate social responsibilities and legal and ethical issues than the online entries of the traditional encyclopedia, which were predominantly neutral. The findings stress that the knowledge-generation processes in society appear to be fundamentally shifting because of the use of social media collaboration. These changes significantly impact which information becomes available to society and how it is framed. 相似文献
15.
《Journalism Practice》2013,7(2):145-160
Within only a few years, the collaborative online encyclopedia Wikipedia has become one of the most popular websites in the world. At the same time, Wikipedia has become the subject of much controversy because of inaccuracies and hoaxes found in some of its entries. Journalists, therefore, have remained skeptical about the reliability and accuracy of Wikipedia's information, despite the fact that research has consistently shown an overall high level of accuracy compared to traditional encyclopedia. This study analyzed the framing of Wikipedia and its use as a news source by five US national newspapers over an eight-year period. A content analysis of 1486 Wikipedia references in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Christian Science Monitor found that Wikipedia is framed predominantly neutral and positive, and that it is increasingly used as a news source. By framing Wikipedia as credible and accurate, the newspapers help legitimize the use of the online encyclopedia. By allowing Wikipedia to influence their news agendas as a source, the newspapers confirm the growing reliability of Wikipedia. 相似文献
16.
维基百科是一部具有开放性、自由性、中立性和公众集体参与编撰的在线百科全书.网络百科全书的成功依赖于广大用户的积极参与和贡献.但是,在国内维基用户的编辑参与率不高.论文探讨了维基编辑参与率低的原因,有技术设施因素、网民心理因素和管理制度因素.针对其原因,提出了相应对策：降低门槛,让人们入门不难;提供服务满意度,激发兴趣回报社区;完善激励机制,精神和物质双重奖励. 相似文献