共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
[目的/意义]在网络百科中,用户之间的冲突已成为影响词条内容质量的重要因素。对这种冲突的研究,可以为提升网络百科内容质量提供新的角度和理论借鉴。[方法/过程]以"PX词条保卫战"为例,采用社会网络分析和文本分析方法,对比分析PX词条编辑过程的3个阶段。[结果/结论]用户协作是常态,冲突也是常态;用户冲突种类不唯一,并非都是由认知差异引发的;不同种类冲突的特征具有显著差异,例如冲突强度、冲突关系结构;应该对冲突进行管理,管理方法必须多样化。 相似文献
2.
3.
百科已成为Web 2.0环境下知识组织的一种新形式,它集中体现了Web 2.0用户参与、协同创作的特点,是Web 2.0的一种典型应用。目前,尤其是在中文环境下,有关百科词条特征及用户贡献行为的研究还不多见。本文采用计量学方法,以近30万条百度百科数据为基础,对词条特征和用户贡献行为进行统计分析。研究发现:词条编辑次数、用户创建词条数和编辑词条数均符合幂率分布,特别是百度百科具有不同于"指数增长"的词条增长规律;对于创建词条与编辑词条行为来说,绝大多数用户没有偏好性。本研究有助于认识百科这种网络信息资源及其贡献者,并为进一步系统优化和用户激励研究提供参考依据。图7。表3。参考文献15。 相似文献
4.
[目的/意义] 对大规模用户讨论过程进行分析，能够深入挖掘网络百科群体冲突发展特征及其影响因素，并有助于理解内容生产过程中的群体冲突现象，为管理这种冲突提供理论指导。[方法/过程] 在团队冲突理论基础上，构建包括词条主题、冲突成因、任务复杂度、冲突持续时间、冲突强度、冲突转化、冲突结果7个变量的编码框架，采用内容分析法从冲突开端、中间过程、冲突结果三个方面对选自于百度百科吧中与词条编辑冲突相关的137个"用户讨论过程"展开分析。[结果/结论] 研究发现，认知差异、利益矛盾和权力分歧均为网络百科群体冲突发生的原因，且无主次之分；任务复杂度与冲突强度呈正相关关系，且在一定范围内与冲突发生的可能性呈负相关关系，但对冲突结果无直接影响；冲突转化会显著提高冲突强度，冲突强度与冲突持续时间呈正相关关系。冲突强度过大和冲突转化均不利于冲突的解决。网络百科群体冲突结果包括分离、支配、妥协、整合一致、结构性改善5种类型，但超过一半的冲突并未得到解决。 相似文献
5.
[目的/意义]图书馆学、情报学及档案学(简称“图情档学”)是当代培养新型信息知识人才的重要学科,本文揭示“十三五”期间图情档学科中外期刊论文的研究热点及趋势,以期为我国图情档学科的未来研究提供些许思路,有助于推动图情档学科的发展,提升学术话语权。[方法/过程]选取国内的CNKI和国外的Web of Science数据库为数据来源,以2016-2020年图情档的核心期刊论文为研究样本,运用Citespace、VOSviewer、Gephi等可视化软件,从发文量与被引量、关键词共现及时区分布揭示中外文期刊的研究热点以及发展趋势。[结果/结论]研究发现,“十三五”期间,中文期刊论文的发文量呈逐年略递减趋势,外文期刊论文发文量呈现上升趋势,学科领域的研究逐渐面向国际化;中外期刊论文研究热点呈现研究主题多元化、“图书馆”相关主题研究逐步深化、论文主题紧跟本学科的研究热点与动向,但各有侧重等特点;整体呈现出对传统研究领域的坚守与深化,与其他学科的交叉融合发展,向社会公众领域的拓展的研究趋势。 相似文献
6.
[目的/意义] 探索期刊论文科学数据引用特征与规律不仅有助于描述学科领域对科学数据的利用情况，还能够揭示学术成果表达中的数据引用模式。[方法/过程] 以我国图书情报领域6种期刊2017年与2018年第一期刊载论文为样本，结合国家标准《信息技术科学数据引用》的引用元素，采用内容分析法从9个维度对样本论文的科学数据引用行为进行数据编码，应用统计学方法描述图书情报领域期刊论文科学数据引用特征并探索不同维度特征间的关联关系。[结果/结论] 图书情报领域期刊论文广泛引用来自国内外的统计整理类科学数据，对期刊论文中个人研究科学数据的引用量较大；科学数据引用标注方式与科学数据类型存在一定对应关系，但多样化的标注方式缺乏统一性；二手引用现象较为突出，二手引用程度与科学数据创建者类型相关。 相似文献
7.
[目的/意义] 自2007年以来,我国图情领域每年发表的期刊论文均已超过2万篇,现以CNKI发布的数据为例,揭示这些期刊论文的写作选题及其研究特点可在一定程度上反映我国图情领域当前的研究风格,也可为我国图情学科研究人员把握学科发展脉络和拓展研究思路提供参考。[方法/过程] 综合应用理论归纳法和比较研究法,从选题角度、来源素材、研究方法、写作思路等4个维度梳理图情学科当前的研究模式,总结提炼出我国图情学科的7种研究模式,并以图情学科2015-2017年18种核心期刊所刊载的论文为研究对象,从7种研究模式的总体数量分布、发表年份分布、期刊分布和作者机构分布等方面进行定量分析。[结果/结论] 我国图情学科7种研究模式在理论创作主体、期刊主题导向、实际应用场景和现代技术发展的综合驱动下呈现出不同特点。具体体现为：新兴理念与技术的应用探索研究开创了图情实践活动的新场景;基于文献信息资源的理论总结研究已成为当前主流研究模式;面向一线业务的应用剖析研究丰富了图情学科的研究体系;数理统计的应用研究拓展了图情学科的研究方法;现代信息技术发展背景下催生的计算机软件应用和算法设计研究开阔了图情学科的研究视角;学科融合模式为图情学科开展跨界研究提供了新渠道。 相似文献
8.
毛丹 《大学图书情报学刊》2017,35(6):102-107
以DOAJ收录的图情类OA期刊论文为研究对象,运用文献计量学方法从文献增长率、国家和语言分布、出版机构分布、作者合著度、网络影响力、期刊引用率等多个角度,分析图情专业OA期刊发展现状,并通过对高频关键词的统计、论文主题分析等途径,总结国外图情专业研究热点与发展趋势,对我国图情专业科研人员了解国外优秀OA期刊信息,促进我国OA期刊发展具有一定参考价值。 相似文献
9.
[目的/意义]揭示2002年以来图情领域重要国家在学术论文产出的总量、引证、研究主题、学术合作等维度上的学术贡献与特征演化,为图情领域的学科建设及相关研究者追踪研究主题与前沿提供参考。[方法/过程]以近15年WoS数据库收录的图情领域86种核心期刊为研究对象,应用文献计量学、科学知识图谱、计量模型等研究方法,运用TDA、Ucinet、VOSviewer等数据分析工具,从学术论文的总量特征、引证特征、主题特征三个角度对图情领域重要国家的学术贡献进行深入分析,并构建计量模型考察空间距离及学术能力对重要国家之间学术合作的影响机制。[结果/结论]美国在图情领域的科研实力强劲,中国的学术贡献增速最快,荷兰、芬兰、比利时三国则在归一化被引比率指标上表现突出;研究主题主要集中在图书馆、信息检索、互联网、知识管理、社交网络、计量学、用户研究、研究方法8个主题范畴,英国、西班牙、中国、美国的研究主题最为广泛;空间距离与学术能力都对国家间的学术合作具有显著影响。 相似文献
10.
在线百科词条中蕴含着海量的人物间关系信息,基于这些信息可以抽取出大规模社会网络,为数字人文和社会计算研究提供数据支撑。本研究以百度百科为例,首次对面向中文在线百科的大规模社会网络抽取进行探索,提出一种新的人物社会网络抽取方法。该方法利用排序学习综合多种特征计算人物关系权重,通过估计人物生存时空来发现人物间的时空耦合关系。由此,从百度百科中抽取出一个带权重的跨时空人物社会网络和一个时空耦合的人物网络。这两个人物网络具有良好的小世界和无标度特性,并存在清晰的社区结构。最后,通过可视化分析展示了百科人物网络在数字人文研究中的应用模式和应用价值。图8。表6。参考文献39。 相似文献
11.
Using 17 open-access journals published without interruption between 2000 and 2004 in the field of library and information science, this study compares the pattern of cited/citing hyperlinked references of Web-based scholarly electronic articles under various citation ranges in terms of language, file format, source and top-level domain. While the patterns of cited references were manually examined by counting the live hyperlinked-cited references, the patterns of citing references were examined by using the cited by tag in Google Scholar. The analysis indicates that although language, top-level domain, and file format of citations did not differ significantly for articles under different citation ranges, sources of citation differed significantly for articles in different citation ranges. Articles with fewer citations mostly cite less-scholarly sources such as Web pages, whereas articles with a higher number of citations mostly cite scholarly sources such as journal articles, etc. The findings suggest that 8 out of 17 OA journals in LIS have significant research impact in the scholarly communication process. 相似文献
12.
We investigate the contributions of scientific software to library and information science (LIS) research using a sample of 572 English language articles published in 13 journals in 2008, 2011, 2014, and 2017. In particular, we examine the use and citation of software freely available for academic use in the LIS literature; we also explore the extent to which researchers follow software citation instructions provided by software developers. Twenty-seven percent of the LIS journal articles in our sample explicitly mention and use software. Yet although LIS researchers are becoming increasingly reliant on software that is freely available for academic use, many still fail to include formal citations of such software in their publications. We also find that a substantial proportion of researchers, when documenting software use, do not cite the software in the manner recommended by its developers. 相似文献
13.
14.
Many journals post accepted articles online before they are formally published in an issue. Early citation impact evidence for these articles could be helpful for timely research evaluation and to identify potentially important articles that quickly attract many citations. This article investigates whether Microsoft Academic can help with this task. For over 65,000 Scopus in-press articles from 2016 and 2017 across 26 fields, Microsoft Academic found 2–5 times as many citations as Scopus, depending on year and field. From manual checks of 1122 Microsoft Academic citations not found in Scopus, Microsoft Academic’s citation indexing was faster but not much wider than Scopus for journals. It achieved this by associating citations to preprints with their subsequent in-press versions and by extracting citations from in-press articles. In some fields its coverage of scholarly digital libraries, such as arXiv.org, was also an advantage. Thus, Microsoft Academic seems to be a more comprehensive automatic source of citation counts for in-press articles than Scopus. 相似文献
15.
The Web impact of open access social science research 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
For a long time, Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) journal citations have been widely used for research performance monitoring of the sciences. For the social sciences, however, the Social Sciences Citation Index® (SSCI®) can sometimes be insufficient. Broader types of publications (e.g., books and non-ISI journals) and informal scholarly indicators may also be needed. This article investigates whether the Web can help to fill this gap. The authors analyzed 1530 citations from Google™ to 492 research articles from 44 open access social science journals. The articles were published in 2001 in the fields of education, psychology, sociology, and economics. About 19% of the Web citations represented formal impact equivalent to journal citations, and 11% were more informal indicators of impact. The average was about 3 formal and 2 informal impact citations per article. Although the proportions of formal and informal online impact were similar in sociology, psychology, and education, economics showed six times more formal impact than informal impact. The results suggest that new types of citation information and informal scholarly indictors could be extracted from the Web for the social sciences. Since these form only a small proportion of the Web citations, however, Web citation counts should first be processed to remove irrelevant citations. This can be a time-consuming process unless automated. 相似文献
16.
17.
Zahiruddin Khurshid 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1):81-98
This research study evaluates the quality of articles published by Saudi and expatriate authors in foreign Library and Information Science (LIS) journals using three popular metrics for ranking journals—Journal Impact Factor (JIF), SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), and Google Scholar Metrics (GSM). The reason for using multiple metrics is to see how closely or differently journals are ranked by the three different methods of citation analysis. However, the 2012 JIF list of journals is too small, almost half the size of the SJR and GSM lists, which inhibited one-to-one comparison among the impact factors of the thirty-six journals selected by Saudi authors for publishing articles. Only seventeen journals were found common to all the three lists, limiting the usefulness of the data. A basic problem is that Saudi LIS authors generally lack the level of competency in the English language required to achieve publication in the most prominent LIS journals. The study will have implications for authors, directors, and deans of all types of academic libraries; chairmen and deans of library schools; and the Saudi Library Association. Hopefully these entities will take necessary steps to prepare and motivate both academics and practicing librarians to improve the quality of their research and publications and thus get published in higher ranked journals. 相似文献
18.
《期刊图书馆员》2012,62(1-2):38-48
ABSTRACTThis article presents a thorough bibliometric analysis of research published in Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), an India-based journal, for the period 2011–2017. Specifically, it compares this journal’s trends with those of other library and information science (LIS) journals from the same geographical area (India, and Asia as a whole) and with the 10 highest-rated LIS journals worldwide. The source of the data used was the multidisciplinary database Scopus. To perform this comparison, ALIS’ production was analyzed in order to identify authorship patterns; for example, authors’ countries of residence, co-authorship trends, and collaboration networks. Research topics were identified through keyword analysis, while performance was measured by examining the number of citations articles received. This study provides substantial information. The research lines detected through examining the keywords in ALIS articles were determined to be similar to those for the top LIS journals in both Asia and worldwide. Specifically, ALIS authors are focusing on metrics, bibliometrics, and social networking, which follows global trends. Notably, however, collaboration among Asia-based journals was found to be lower than that in the top-indexed journals in the LIS field, showing lesser internationalization. The results obtained present a roadmap for expanding the research in this field. 相似文献
19.
Chuanfu Chen Ping WangAuthor VitaeYaqi LiuAuthor Vitae Gang WuAuthor VitaePei WangAuthor Vitae 《Government Information Quarterly》2013
The purpose of this research is to investigate the current state and trend of government website information cited by social science and humanities (SS&H) journal articles in China. The Chinese Social Science Citation Index (CSSCI) was used as the benchmark and the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) journals as the reference samples. It analyzed 204,019 web citations (N = 5,063,237) found in 925,506 articles that were published in CSSCI journals during the 1998–2009 period. The findings unveil that web citations accounted for only 4.03% of the total number of citations (N = 5,063,237), and that citations of Chinese government websites constituted 6.6% of the total number of web citations (N = 204,019). The study disclosed detailed information regarding citations derived from ministries and commissions directly under the State Council websites (N = 69), government online media (N = 7), government website citation subjects (N = 21), and various types of government website information (N = 5). Although government website information has limited influence on SS&H, their impact is currently growing rapidly. In comparison with international research community, influence of government web information on Chinese social science is higher, while its influence on humanities is lower. Essentially, Chinese scholars put emphasis on citing information from authoritative central government websites or highly visible state-owned media information as supporting evidences in their articles. In general, the citation of information from Chinese government website tends to hot social issues of society. Finally, it is necessary to promote the visibility of local government websites, to develop policies and guidelines to encourage the disclosure and the diversity of data, so that there will be more citation balances between social and technological topics. 相似文献