PageRank variants in the evaluation of citation networks     

《Journal of Informetrics》2014,8(3):683-692

This paper explores a possible approach to a research evaluation, by calculating the renown of authors of scientific papers. The evaluation is based on the citation analysis and its results should be close to a human viewpoint. The PageRank algorithm and its modifications were used for the evaluation of various types of citation networks. Our main research question was whether better evaluation results were based directly on an author network or on a publication network. Other issues concerned, for example, the determination of weights in the author network and the distribution of publication scores among their authors. The citation networks were extracted from the computer science domain in the ISI Web of Science database. The influence of self-citations was also explored. To find the best network for a research evaluation, the outputs of PageRank were compared with lists of prestigious awards in computer science such as the Turing and Codd award, ISI Highly Cited and ACM Fellows. Our experiments proved that the best ranking of authors was obtained by using a publication citation network from which self-citations were eliminated, and by distributing the same proportional parts of the publications’ values to their authors. The ranking can be used as a criterion for the financial support of research teams, for identifying leaders of such teams, etc.  相似文献   

互联网时代科技文献评价影响因素探讨     

孙卫 《数字图书馆论坛》2012,(6):30-35

对于科技内容的评价方式,仅从期刊文章被引的角度进行评判,在互联网时代已经显得不足了。互联网时代发表科技观点的多样性、传播的广域性、传播的快速性使得科技内容被利用的因素有很多。使用者对文章观点的态度、作者和专家公开发表的科技内容的情况、使用者利用互联网进行发现与利用的情况等,都可能是对科技内容进行评价分析的因素。  相似文献   

基于多维度谱系的文献著者社会网络模型研究     

黄娟  杨新涯  魏群义  沈敏 《大学图书馆学报》2012,30(5):67-70

基于图书馆2.0系统构建文献著者的家谱、籍贯谱、学业谱(著者的学习经历)、从业谱(著者的工作经历)、学术谱(著者的各类型文献产出)等的知识库,旨在更深入地了解文献著者的社会属性和社会关系,以形成特定的社交群体和核心人群(同族网圈、乡亲网圈、学术网圈、同学网圈、同事网圈),扩展图书馆发展的新思路。  相似文献   

中国古代图书作者署名形式考略     

李明杰  周亚 《大学图书馆学报》2012,30(1):111-115,126

中国古代图书作者署名从最初的不署名,到书名兼署作者信息,再到后来单独的卷端署名;从单一的著述方式的题署,到多种著述方式的分列题署,再到后来的各种著述方式的组合题署;从单一的作者姓名的题署,到姓名与朝代、籍贯、官职、字号、著述方式等其他项目的连署,中国古代图书作者署名历经了从无到有、从简陋到详细的规范化发展过程,这也是古人著作权意识不断觉醒和深化的过程。  相似文献   

论书次号   总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12  

吴昌合 《中国图书馆学报》2000,26(2):88

论述了编制书次号的要求 ;评论了著者号与种次号的优劣、《通用汉语著者号码表》的实用价值以及书次号标准化等问题 ,并对今后标准化的发展提出新思路、新见解。参考文献 7  相似文献