排序方式： 共有5条查询结果，搜索用时 17 毫秒
1
1.
Mei Tian 《Teaching in Higher Education》2017,22(8):957-974
This study explores the challenges faced by young lecturers in managerial transformation in elite Chinese academic institutions which aim to develop into world-class universities. Drawing on data from in-depth interviews, the paper discusses how a group of lecturers on tenure-track contracts at a research university in China perceived the impacts of this managerial personnel reform. The study revealed intensified academic pressure and consequent feelings of insecurity, uncertainty and anxiety among the participants. Rigid tenure requirements pushed down research quality, and detracted from the efforts the participants could have devoted to teaching. Further negative impacts were strengthened power hierarchies and increasingly gendered nature of the academic culture. 相似文献
2.
徐雷 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》2020,(2):20-27
教师是高校的核心战略资源。近年来,高校教师差异化聘用趋势明显。差异化聘用表现为三种模式:一是不同职业发展轨迹下长聘轨教职和普通轨教职差异聘用;二是不同薪酬分配模式下年薪制教职和岗位薪酬制教职差异聘用;三是不同合同聘期下终身教职和任期教职差异聘用。差异化聘用源于一系列强制性因素和诱致性因素的共同作用。强制性因素主要是政府主导的教师聘用制改革所带来的自上而下的强力推动;诱致性因素主要是教师身份趋于多元,以及大学职能扩展和绩效管理所带来的自下而上的路径探索。差异化聘用三种模式交叉、共存,体现了教育公益、教师私益和高校绩效管理的有机结合,值得肯定。但也应警惕可能引发的过度市场化倾向、“精英”“普通”教师疏离、效率与学术不平衡等负面效应。 相似文献
3.
本文主要采用内容分析法,以斯坦福大学(Stanford University)、密歇根大学(the University of Michigan)、匹兹堡大学(University of Pittsburgh)和佛罗里达州立大学(Florida State University)四所学校为案例,以《教师手册》(Faculty Handbook)的文本为主要研究对象,总结了美国大学对终身教职的最新界定,分析了它们在终身教职的现行政策中所广泛采用的做法,并在此基础上结合文献调研预测了终身教职的发展趋势. 相似文献
4.
终身教职制度是美国高校自发形成的内生型制度,丰富的教职来源、强健的专业保障、完善的学术氛围、畅通的流动机制和宽松的文化环境构成了其繁荣的土壤。我国高校实施预聘-长聘制虽然取得了突出效果,但同时也暴露出了一系列问题:一是外生型改革导致利益博弈复杂,制度移植存在水土不服现象;二是"非升即走"中的培养支持不足,教师"走"后的兜底保障不够;三是晋升前易出现急功近利的现象,晋升后易成为"保护懒汉"的制度。建议完善制度顶层设计与动力传导链条,关注政策实施的弹性与灵活性;落实预聘期内的培养支持机制,完善教师"走"后的兜底保障制度;实施适应性与发展性考核评价,建立健全终身教职后评估制度。 相似文献
5.
Amy J. Vilz 《College & Undergraduate Libraries》2015,22(2):149-166
Hiring and retaining talent in academic libraries marks a significant investment of time and capital for colleges and universities. This is particularly true for tenure-track academic librarians. Successful attainment of tenure is in the interests of both librarians and administrators, and many institutions offer tenure support systems to assist librarians in this regard. A forty-four question survey assessed tenure-track librarians' perceptions and satisfaction of whether tenure requirements are adequately supported in their critical partnership with library administrators. While most respondents expressed somewhat moderate satisfaction with provided support measures, support type and quantity varied significantly. A recommendation for creating a comprehensive program of support is discussed. 相似文献
1