| 形而上学的科学性质疑--解读康德的《未来形而上学导论》 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曹亚芳.形而上学的科学性质疑--解读康德的《未来形而上学导论》[J].陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版),2004,22(2):26-29,63. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曹亚芳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 陕西理工学院,社会科学部,陕西,汉中,723000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 按照康德的逻辑轨道,形而上学是以理念总和为研究对象的。而当时的形而上学玩弄的是虚假的辩证,用只能使用在经验对象的理智来论证用纯粹理性才能论证清楚的问题,结果出现了普遍的“二律背反”。康德认为要使形而上学成为可能,只能通过理性的批判使形而上学成为先天综合判断。康德的错误在于忘记了思维的自我是不能脱离于经验的,不知道形而上学是不能用科学来要求的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学 形而上学 康德 纯粹理性 先天综合判断 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-0842(2004)02-0026-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年9月15日 |
Questioning the Scientificality of Metaphysics |
| |
| CAO Ya-fang.Questioning the Scientificality of Metaphysics[J].Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology:Social Sciences,2004,22(2):26-29,63. |
| |
| Authors: | CAO Ya-fang |
| |
| Abstract: | In Kant's logic, the object of metaphysics is the sum_up of ideas, yet in those days it basically resorted to the false dialectics, by the intellect of the experiential object rather than the pure rationality to verify the concerned issue, which led to the rise of universal "antinomy". Kant believed that metaphysics would have been possible if it were a synthetic priori judgment, but he forgot that experience is indispensable from thinking_in_itself, and metaphysics is unsuited for its modification by science. |
| |
| Keywords: | metaphysics science Kant pure rationality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
