共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 488 毫秒
1.
[目的/意义] 针对当前我国财经高校图书馆阅读推广活动中的长效发展乏力问题,探索建立一套规范有序的阅读推广长效发展体系,引导财经高校图书馆长期、深入地开展阅读推广和服务,提高人才培养及服务质量。[方法/过程] 采用问卷、文献调查、访谈以及网络调查等方法,对财经高校图书馆阅读推广活动进行调查统计,分析现有阅读推广活动中存在的规划缺失等问题。[结果/结论] 提出通过开展连续性的读者研究、加强读者阅读指导与阅读教育、建立阅读推广网格化体系、加强科学规划、建立阅读推广活动监督及有效性评价制度等举措,建立基于读者需求的图书馆阅读推广长效机制,保障财经高校图书馆阅读推广活动长期、稳定发展。 相似文献
2.
[目的/意义]探索精细化阅读推广流程模式与评价方式,为高校图书馆开展阅读推广活动提供借鉴。[方法/过程]在文献调研基础上,以北京农学院图书馆为例,设计精细化阅读推广流程模式,并针对如何充分调查读者的阅读状况、明确读者的阅读需求点和兴趣点、策划阅读推广活动主题和形式、开展阅读推广活动、收集读者反馈意见、进行阅读推广效果评价等环节逐一进行分析,指出关键注意事项。[结果/结论]高校图书馆精细化阅读推广具有促进读者阅读、馆员成长、业务工作开展的良好效果,同时,良好的阅读推广效果也将促进精细化阅读推广的可持续发展。 相似文献
3.
4.
高校图书馆纸质期刊阅读倾向调查分析研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
文章对南阳理工学院图书馆纸质期刊读者阅读倾向做了较为详细的数据调查,旨在通过调查数据深入了解读者的阅读倾向,并在调查分析的基础上,采取有效的措施,提高服务质量,为读者创造良好的阅读环境. 相似文献
5.
为加强与广大读者的沟通,了解本刊同仁为之辛勤劳动的《新闻记者》杂志,是否得到大家的认可,从而集思广益,共同把这本读物越办越好,进而更好地为读者服务,值创刊100期之际,本刊进行首次大型读者意见征询活动,除西藏、台湾以外,我们向全国29个省市自治区的近千名读者寄发了意见调查表。调查的重点,是与本刊联系较少的地区、单位和读者,上海各新闻单位未发问卷。蒙广大读者厚爱,至今已回收到问卷340余件,现将此番调查所得,作一小小总结,向关心我们的朋友汇报并致谢意。 相似文献
6.
在医学期刊市场化过程中,必须根据读者对象,期刊的品牌特色如栏目设置、文章类型,期刊的发行方式与发行范围等进行准确的市场定位,并在市场竞争中不断进行调整.在准确的市场定位基础上,医学期刊应以读者为核心,努力寻找新的、潜在的读者市场,通过发挥期刊的引领和导向作用,形成适合本刊发展的新的市场. 相似文献
7.
为加强与广大读者的沟通,了解本刊同仁为之辛勤劳动的《新闻记者》杂志,是否得到大家的认可,从而集思广益,共同把这本读物越办越好,进而更好地为读者服务,值创刊100期之际,本刊进行首次大型读者意见征询活动,除西藏、台湾以外,我们向全国29个省市自治区的近千名读者寄发了意见调查表。调查的重点,是与本刊联系较少的地区、单位和读者,上海各新闻单位未发问卷。蒙广大读者厚爱,至今已回收到问卷340余件,现将此番调查所得,作一小小总结,向关心我们的朋友汇报并致谢意。 相似文献
8.
本刊讯 由中国出版科学研究所主持进行的第四次全国国民阅读与购买倾向抽样调查最终成果已于近期发布.本次调查对我国读者对各类图书和杂志的喜好情况与阅读口味变化趋势进行了系统的调查. 相似文献
9.
数字时代的到来,对图书馆读者服务工作的服务理念、媒介、宣传和读者反馈等方面产生了重要影响.文章梳理了数字时代下图书馆阅读概况,深入了解这一背景下读者服务工作所面临的挑战,建议采取一系列可行性措施,以读者的阅读需求与体验为中心,创新服务理念、媒介、方式以及服务宣传活动、服务反馈,力求为读者提供全新的服务模式. 相似文献
10.
11.
医学期刊在数字出版后,需要尽快争取到更多的读者.通过实地问卷调查,从整体上揭示读者对数字医学期刊关注度还不高的现状,并分析影响因素,期望数字医学期刊的读者关注度得到进一步提高. 相似文献
12.
Katherine G. Akers JJ Pionke Ellen Aaronson Rachel Koenig Michelle Kraft Beverly Murphy 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2022,110(2):156
The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) conducted a readership survey in 2020 to gain a deeper understanding of our readers, their reading habits, and their satisfaction with JMLA''s content, website functionality, and overall quality. A total of 467 readers responded to the survey, most of whom were librarians/information specialists (85%), worked in an academic (62%) or hospital/health care system (27%) library, and were current Medical Library Association members (80%). Most survey respondents (46%) reported reading JMLA articles on a quarterly basis. Over half of respondents (53%) said they used social media to follow new research or publications, with Twitter being the most popular platform. Respondents stated that Original Investigations, Case Reports, Knowledge Syntheses, and Resource Reviews articles were the most enjoyable to read and important to their research and practice. Almost all respondents reported being satisfied or very satisfied (94%) with the JMLA website. Some respondents felt that the content of JMLA leaned more toward academic librarianship than toward clinical/hospital librarianship and that there were not enough articles on collection management or technical services. These opinions and insights of our readers help keep the JMLA editorial team on track toward publishing articles that are of interest and utility to our audience, raising reader awareness of new content, providing a website that is easy to navigate and use, and maintaining our status as the premier journal in health sciences librarianship.The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA), in tandem with the Medical Library Association (MLA), periodically conducts readership surveys to gauge how well the journal meets the needs and desires of its readers. However, much time has passed and many changes have occurred since our last readership survey was published in 2013 [1]. These changes include our transition from a largely print-based to an almost fully digital mode of publication, more extensive reliance on providing access to supplemental materials to improve the rigor and reproducibility of research findings, and the use of social media to share and stay abreast of new scholarly works. Therefore, we conducted a readership survey in 2020 to obtain a more current understanding of our readers, their reading habits, and their satisfaction with JMLA''s content, website functionality, and overall quality.The survey was implemented using Qualtrics and consisted of sixteen closed- and open-ended questions (Appendix A). The survey invitation was distributed on July 6, 2020, through MLA email listservs and social media accounts (Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn), JMLA''s Twitter account, and an announcement on the JMLA website. Recipients were encouraged to forward the invitation through other communication channels as appropriate. The survey was closed on July 20, 2020. 相似文献
13.
期刊经营与发展需定位于读者需求及其满足。通过问卷调查法结合访谈搜集读者需求,并对结果加以分析。认为期刊建设须以读者需求为导向,坚持以读者为中心的服务理念,拓展服务空间及形式,科学引导读者的阅读需求,提高读者信息素养,以读者参与的双向互动模式满足读者的阅读需求。 相似文献
14.
作者结合实例分析了科技期刊读者阅读时的四种心理定势:①读者与作者同步,保持一致,读后有充实感;②读者与作者倾向同步,基本一致,但又互相补充;③读者与作者互逆,读者虽然不同意文章蕴含的思想方法和客观发展规律,但能接受;④读者与作者完全相悖,持相反意见。 相似文献
15.
Keren Dali 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(3):175-188
This article focuses on translated fiction, its place and role in readers' advisory services in public libraries, and possible approaches that readers' advisors can take toward this type of reading material. It reviews the relevance of translated fiction to the needs of both English-speaking readers and immigrant readers who speak English as a second language. This article also presents a readily available list of selected readers' advisory and bibliographic sources that can help librarians to keep up with the most recent translated publications. 相似文献
16.
学术论文的发表极其依赖于高质量的同行评议,尽管同行评议不尽善尽美,但能帮助作者提高论文的写作水平以及编辑人员的编辑水平。研究发现,对审稿质量做出最佳贡献的预测因素包括是否为大学附属医院工作的审稿人或研究生毕业10年内的年轻人。目前进一步改善审稿方法的效果很有限,因此有专家建议对审稿人进行正规培训。期刊及其编辑在选择审稿人时,要考虑他们具备何种知识和技能,是否有丰富的审稿经验。这有助于期刊编辑出版单位选择到合适的审稿人,并提高审稿质量。 相似文献
17.
目前有些地球科学类国际期刊在文章致谢段中公布审稿人姓名,或者直接将审稿意见以报告形式刊出.分析表明:公布审稿人可为研究人员把握科研动向、跟踪研究进展提供帮助,具有科学研究风向标的作用;同时,公开审稿人可以使其规范自己的行为,审稿公开透明,起到监督作用,读者也可以通过审稿人甄别问题稿件,对文章进行选择引用.但是,多数审稿人对公开姓名持有保留态度,只有少数领域内的杰出的学者支持公开审稿人身份.本文作者认为:在获得审稿人同意的前提下,可以考虑公开杰出学者审稿人和绿色通道录用稿件的审稿人.由此可以获得读者认可,促进文章引用. 相似文献
18.
为论证科技期刊按需编制印刷版年终主题词索引的合理性,本文设计问卷,调查《中华烧伤杂志》读者年龄、职称等一般信息.将调查对象按照上述内容进行分类,调查其是否知晓本刊年终主题词索引、查询本刊文章及检索医学文献的常用路径,对数据行Pearson卡方检验及Bonferroni校正.结果是:327名调查对象中,与41～50岁及51～60岁调查对象比较,21～30岁调查对象对本刊印刷版年终主题词索引的知晓比例明显下降(P值均小于0.05);与高级职称调查对象比较,无职称(研究生)、初级职称、中级职称调查对象对本刊印刷版年终主题词索引的知晓比例明显下降(P值均小于0.05).各年龄段及各种职称等级调查对象中,不足38％通过纸版期刊查询本刊文章.可见年轻读者对印刷版年终主题词索引的知晓度降低,应用率也较低,大部分读者倾向于通过网络查询期刊文章.提示科技期刊印刷版年终主题词索引的编制已失去原有的作用和意义,按需省略是合理的. 相似文献
19.
This paper reports on a study of social scientists’ information seeking and use of scholarly journals to support scholarly communication and information needs. The goals of the study are: to explore the characteristics of information needs for social scientists; to discuss the importance of scholarly journals to social scientists and their information seeking and access means; to identify article reading patterns of social scientists; and to make comparisons between scholarly journals use and reading patterns of social scientists and other scientists in Taiwan and the USA. The author used a questionnaire survey and interview methods to investigate the information seeking, use and reading of scholarly journals, and article deep reading patterns of social scientists. The target population was social science faculty members from National Cheng-chi University in Taiwan. The article explores the characteristics of information needs for social scientists and shows that scholarly journals are important information resources for university social science faculty. Social science faculty in Taiwan use scholarly journals in multiple languages, mainly English, Chinese, German, and Japanese, which is different from scientists in the United States. In addition, they use electronic journals more than print journals. The number of article readings by social science faculty members was approximately 195 readings per year and nearly 440 h were spent reading per year. In contrast to scientists in the United States, the social scientists in Taiwan read fewer readings, spent more time reading, and read older articles. In addition, the study identifies article reading patterns of social scientists and proposes a six-type taxonomy of article deep reading. The study reports the scholarly journal use and reading behavior model of social scientists and shows there are some differences in scholarly journal seeking and use by social science faculty in Taiwan and scientists in the United States. Further studies of scholarly journal and electronic journal use and reading by social scientists across countries, subject disciplines, and languages of journals are needed. 相似文献
20.
特色函件推送系统设计及其对论文阅读率的提升作用 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
地球与环境科学信息网(EES)的函件推送系统具有推送内容丰富、期刊品种多样、推送对象精确、推送触发自动化以及适用范围广(可推送约稿函、邀请函、期刊宣传推广内容等)的特点.该系统以EES较大数据量和更小的元数据碎片化颗粒度为基础,经近4个月试运行,发送函件近4万件,EES点击量显著升高,平均日点击量为该系统未运行前的3.7倍.该系统发送的函件拒收率和退订率均小于1％,超过70％的访问来源为电子信箱直接链接,受访界面为期刊论文.此外,一些编辑部反馈编辑部网站访问量明显升高.以上数据均表明,该系统对科技期刊论文阅读率有良好的提升作用. 相似文献