共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 870 毫秒
1.
浅析网络学术期刊对学术交流的影响 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
简述网络学术期刊的概念;通过对图书情报学、经济学、生物学、计算机科学与网络四种学科的72种中英文网络学术期刊进行分析,探究网络学术期刊提供的信息级别、网络学术期刊的学科属性和语种对学术交流的影响,发现网络学术期刊提供的信息级别越高,它对学术交流的影响就越大;由于各学科人士对互联网的认可度、技术掌握程度等因素的不同,致使不同学科的网络学术期刊对学术交流的影响亦有不同;目前,英文网络学术期刊对学术交流的影响要大于中文网络学术期刊。 相似文献
2.
从信息博弈看科技学术期刊的审稿策略 总被引：4，自引：4，他引：0
从信息博弈角度看,为了应对关系稿与审稿人的道德风险问题,科技学术期刊分别采取了"编辑学者化"与"信号识别"的审稿策略;但是,由此产生的"信号异化"及其所带来的"学术寻租"与"逆向选择"问题,使得科技学术期刊必须坚持"把科技学术期刊当作学术期刊来办"和"把专家审稿与编辑审稿相结合"的审稿策略. 相似文献
3.
：根据中国学术期刊（光盘版）检索与评价数据规范GB6447的要求,笔者对加入中国学术期刊光盘版的部分图书情报类期刊的期刊基本参数以及所刊论文的摘要、关键词、作者简介和参考文献等的标准化和规范化问题进行了统计分析,结果发现不规范问题比较严重。这一问题应当引起我们图书情报类期刊编辑的深思。为了促进信息交流,我们应更加认真、努力地工作,使我们所编辑的期刊达到标准化和规范化的要求。 相似文献
4.
文章深入学习习近平总书记给《文史哲》编辑部的回信精神,并以此为契机,对哲学社会科学学术期刊高质量发展的价值内核、时代境遇和实践理路进行了分析。指出推动哲学社会科学学术期刊高质量发展要以马克思主义为指导,坚持正确的办刊方向;加强学术期刊制度建设及制度执行力;运用现代化信息技术为高质量发展赋能;通过队伍增能,统筹学术期刊高质量发展与编辑职业成长的关系。 相似文献
5.
This paper presents an index that measures reviewer contribution to editorial processes of scholarly journals. Following a metaphor of ranking algorithms in sports tournaments, we created an index that considers reviewers on different context-specific dimensions, i.e., report delivery time, the length of the report and the alignment of recommendations to editorial decisions. To test the index, we used a dataset of peer review in a multi-disciplinary journal, including 544 reviewers on 606 submissions in six years. Although limited by sample size, the test showed that the index identifies outstanding contributors and weak performing reviewers efficiently. Our index is flexible, contemplates extensions and could be incorporated into available scholarly journal management tools. It can assist editors in rewarding high performing reviewers and managing editorial turnover. 相似文献
6.
7.
《中国中药杂志》根据现阶段期刊发展需求,探索出一套特色化、全方位的绩效考核管理机制。将编辑分为纸质版编辑、网络与信息编辑2种类型,并分设了不同的管理考核标准。对纸质版编辑的考核综合了选题组稿,文章的下载频次、被引频次、刊用周期,举办或参加会议与培训,参与基金项目,创收等多个方面;对网络与信息编辑的考核则侧重于激励研发与创新。对于编委会,也打破常规,采取量化考核与竞争机制。通过对编辑部和编委会实行特色化的量化考核、绩效管理制度,将编辑和专家的个人贡献与期刊整体发展紧密结合,充分发挥了其潜能和资源优势,使期刊综合实力得到迅速提升。 相似文献
8.
Journal articles are the most common publication format for U.S. academic health sciences librarians. This is consistent with the findings of other researchers. Of the total publications in this study, 68% were in journals. Watson found that 69% of the academic librarians' publications were published in some type of journal [8]. Similarly, Yerkey and Glogowski found that 67% of the publications in their study were journal articles, although their population consisted of all types of authors of library/information science materials [9]. Both the present study and Watson found that monographs were the second most common publication outlet. Watson found that 16% of the total publications were monographs; the current study identified 14.8% of the total publications as monographs [10]. Although Watson's findings are similar to the newer results, it is important to note that Watson's study was conducted in a different manner and included book reviews, which were not counted in the present study. The health sciences librarians in the present study published more than two thirds of their articles in library/information science journals and 27% in health sciences journals. Similarly, in Yerkey and Glogowski's study, the second-largest number of library/information science articles appeared in medical and health sciences journals [11]. Fang also found that 22.57% of the journal articles on health sciences librarianship or by health sciences librarians were in medical journals [12. This seems to demonstrate the desire of health sciences librarians to communicate with the health professionals. Yerkey and Glogowski that library and information science is an interdisciplinary field, "borrowing and supplying information to and from other disciplines"[13]. 相似文献
9.
Scholarly article seeking,reading, and use: a continuing evolution from print to electronic in the sciences and social sciences 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Electronic journals are now the norm for accessing and reading scholarly articles. This article examines scholarly article reading patterns by faculty in five US universities in 2012. Selected findings are also compared to some general trends from studies conducted periodically since 1977. In the 2012 survey, over three‐quarters (76%) of the scholarly readings were obtained through electronic means and just over half (51%) of readings were read on a screen rather than from a print source or being printed out. Readings from library sources are overwhelmingly from e‐sources. The average number of articles read per month was 20.66, with most articles read by the medical and other sciences, and on average each article was read for 32 minutes. 相似文献
10.
论述建设数字化学术资源中心的必要性和信息产业的发展与数字化学术资源中心的关系。认为建设数字化学术资源中心的目标是:建设图书馆统一资源门户,提供参考链接扩展服务,实现多种元数据格式的管理,开展文献传递和馆际互借服务,并分析与介绍国内外为实现上述目标已取得的技术成果。 相似文献
11.
社科期刊专业化、特色化发展路径选择 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
国内外期刊业对学术期刊专业化水平的要求与期刊分级的制度化给期刊界带来前所未有的机遇与挑战,期刊专业化、特色化发展是高校综合性社会科学学报走出困境的唯一可行道路,为此期刊界人士进行了各种探索。发挥主编办刊的主观能动性,努力实现编辑学者化、专业化转型,整合资源联合办刊、走社会化办刊道路是社科期刊专业化、特色化发展的路径。 相似文献
12.
Giangiacomo Bravo Mike Farjam Francisco Grimaldo Moreno Aliaksandr Birukou Flaminio Squazzoni 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(1):101-112
This paper aims to examine the influence of authors’ reputation on editorial bias in scholarly journals. By looking at eight years of editorial decisions in four computer science journals, including 7179 observations on 2913 submissions, we reconstructed author/referee-submission networks. For each submission, we looked at reviewer scores and estimated the reputation of submission authors by means of their network degree. By training a Bayesian network, we estimated the potential effect of scientist reputation on editorial decisions. Results showed that more reputed authors were less likely to be rejected by editors when they submitted papers receiving negative reviews. Although these four journals were comparable for scope and areas, we found certain journal specificities in their editorial process. Our findings suggest ways to examine the editorial process in relatively similar journals without recurring to in-depth individual data, which are rarely available from scholarly journals. 相似文献
13.
The Web impact of open access social science research 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
For a long time, Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) journal citations have been widely used for research performance monitoring of the sciences. For the social sciences, however, the Social Sciences Citation Index® (SSCI®) can sometimes be insufficient. Broader types of publications (e.g., books and non-ISI journals) and informal scholarly indicators may also be needed. This article investigates whether the Web can help to fill this gap. The authors analyzed 1530 citations from Google™ to 492 research articles from 44 open access social science journals. The articles were published in 2001 in the fields of education, psychology, sociology, and economics. About 19% of the Web citations represented formal impact equivalent to journal citations, and 11% were more informal indicators of impact. The average was about 3 formal and 2 informal impact citations per article. Although the proportions of formal and informal online impact were similar in sociology, psychology, and education, economics showed six times more formal impact than informal impact. The results suggest that new types of citation information and informal scholarly indictors could be extracted from the Web for the social sciences. Since these form only a small proportion of the Web citations, however, Web citation counts should first be processed to remove irrelevant citations. This can be a time-consuming process unless automated. 相似文献
14.
学术期刊参考文献规范化问题探讨——以图书情报专业核心期刊为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
以图书馆学情报学核心期刊为例,对2008年下半年出版的17种期刊执行GB/T7714-2005<文后参考文献著录规则>的情况进行抽样调查.结果发现,在文内标注、文后著录格式和电子文献著录方面存在大量不规范现象,对失误原因分析之后,提出应充分发挥编辑的把关作用、责任意识、教育作用和提高作者写作基本功两方面来加强编辑与作者的规范意识. 相似文献
15.
论述高校自然科学学报主编具备贡献意识的必要性和充分性以及对学报贡献承诺的重要意义。认为:贡献意识是使学报主编工作具有有效性的关键,学报主编有了贡献意识,才会有先进的办刊理念和将学报做强、做大的事业心,才会发现并重视同事的所长及其对学报所作的点滴贡献,才会让学报编辑部每一个成员的才智得到充分发挥,从而使学报的社会效益和经济效益得到显著增长。 相似文献
16.
17.
网络学术期刊运作模式研究 总被引：5，自引：1，他引：5
在界定网络学术期刊的基础上，从国际化水平、稿件接收与评审、出版形式、读者服务、经费与版权问题、平行载体等方面探讨网络学术期刊的运作模式，指出其对构建新的学术交流体系和形成新的学术出版格局的意义。 相似文献
18.
《Journal of Informetrics》2022,16(2):101288
Research articles are being shared in increasing numbers on multiple online platforms. Although the scholarly impact of these articles has been widely studied, the online interest determined by how long the research articles are shared online remains unclear. Being cognizant of how long a research article is mentioned online could be valuable information to the researchers. In this paper, we analyzed multiple social media platforms on which users share and/or discuss scholarly articles. We built three clusters for papers, based on the number of yearly online mentions having publication dates ranging from the year 1920 to 2016. Using the online social media metrics for each of these three clusters, we built machine learning models to predict the long-term online interest in research articles. We addressed the prediction task with two different approaches: regression and classification. For the regression approach, the Multi-Layer Perceptron model performed best, and for the classification approach, the tree-based models performed better than other models. We found that old articles are most evident in the contexts of economics and industry (i.e., patents). In contrast, recently published articles are most evident in research platforms (i.e., Mendeley) followed by social media platforms (i.e., Twitter). 相似文献
19.
Ángel Borrego Jordi Ardanuy Cristóbal Urbano 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(5):663-670
Academic libraries are increasingly called upon to demonstrate their value to their home institutions. Research collaboration with faculty resulting in the co-authorship of scholarly output is one possible way to demonstrate the alignment of the library with the institutional mission. Involvement in research also improves librarians' skills in offering research support services. This study explores the contribution of librarians to scholarly journals in fields other than Library and Information Science (LIS) as well as their collaboration practices with researchers in those fields. Results show an increasing number of papers published by library-affiliated authors in non-LIS journals between 2006 and 2015. The papers fall broadly into four areas: articles on topics related to LIS published in non-LIS journals; higher education and information literacy; systematic reviews and meta-analysis; and research collaboration in the faculty's areas of expertise. The study is limited by the difficulty in properly retrieving the scholarly output of librarians from bibliographic databases and the difficulty in ascertaining their contributions to published articles. 相似文献