共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Fiorella Foscarini 《Archival Science》2012,12(4):389-409
This paper investigates the relationship between diplomatics and genre theory and suggests that the concepts, methods, and philosophical underpinnings involved in both disciplines be combined for the purpose of achieving a fuller understanding of contemporary communicative actions (of which documents constitute a subset) and their broader context. The situated approach and dynamism characterizing the North American school of rhetorical genre studies, including its emphasis on the socially constructed nature of cultural artifacts, provide insights that appear particularly useful to enhance diplomatics’ exploratory and explanatory power. Through a critical examination of the “building blocks” of diplomatics, the paper aims at demonstrating that, in order to continue to be relevant as a method of inquiry, diplomatics needs to move beyond the abstract identification of the enduring components of the documentary universe as a closed system and embrace a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of the social context that shapes, and is shaped by, our communicative actions. As the dialogue between the two disciplines under consideration is supposed to be mutually beneficial, potential contributions of the “science of the diploma” to genre theory are also explored. 相似文献
2.
An Australian Research Council project, Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, brought together experts in recordkeeping, privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property, torts, medical law and ethics
to address concerns with a major networked Australian health record initiative. The research required developing innovative
research tools and understandings, which provides an exemplar for methodologies to address multiple-disciplinary concerns
and priorities that set a precedent for future inter-disciplinary collaborative projects concerned with the analysis and design
of such systems. This article provides an analysis of the research design, methods, tools and findings of the project which
operated within a records continuum framework.
Dr. Livia Iacovino is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow with the Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics in the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she has taught the legal and ethical curricula in the recordkeeping courses. Her research and publications are focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of archival science, law and ethics, in particular ownership, access and privacy of electronic records. She has been a Chief Investigator for Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and has collaborated internationally with the InterPARES Project and the International Records Management Trust. Barbara Reed has been involved with industry, teaching, research and standards setting, in the course of her 25 years in the recordkeeping and information management communities. She has been the Director of The Recordkeeping Institute since 2000 and has over 20 years consulting experience to all levels of government, private and public companies and not-for profit organisations. She has developed and negotiated Standards for recordkeeping at state, national and international levels. She has published widely on metadata definition and deployment, recordkeeping, interoperability, management of resources over time and digital preservation. She was a Research Associate in the Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, 2002–2005, and Clever Recordkeeping Metadata, 2005–2006, both ARC Projects. 相似文献
| Barbara ReedEmail: |
Dr. Livia Iacovino is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow with the Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics in the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she has taught the legal and ethical curricula in the recordkeeping courses. Her research and publications are focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of archival science, law and ethics, in particular ownership, access and privacy of electronic records. She has been a Chief Investigator for Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and has collaborated internationally with the InterPARES Project and the International Records Management Trust. Barbara Reed has been involved with industry, teaching, research and standards setting, in the course of her 25 years in the recordkeeping and information management communities. She has been the Director of The Recordkeeping Institute since 2000 and has over 20 years consulting experience to all levels of government, private and public companies and not-for profit organisations. She has developed and negotiated Standards for recordkeeping at state, national and international levels. She has published widely on metadata definition and deployment, recordkeeping, interoperability, management of resources over time and digital preservation. She was a Research Associate in the Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, 2002–2005, and Clever Recordkeeping Metadata, 2005–2006, both ARC Projects. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
《Journal Of Archival Organization》2013,11(1):19-34
Abstract Providing K-12 schools with digital access to archival materials can strengthen both student learning and archival practice, although it cannot replace direct physical access to records. This article compares a variety of electronic and non-electronic projects to promote teaching with primary source materials. The article also examines some of the different historiographical and pedagogical approaches used in archival Web sites geared for K-12 instruction, focusing on differences between the educational sites sponsored by the Library of Congress and the National Archives and Records Administration. 相似文献
6.
7.
回顾与前瞻:"十三五"档案学科发展调查和"十四五"档案学重点研究领域展望 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
“十三五”期间,我国档案学科在学科建设、人才培养、学术研究、服务社会、国际交流与合作等方面取得了长足进展,推出了丰富的研究成果,获得了新的更大的发展空间。但在档案学原创性基础理论研究、档案学研究平台、团队与基础设施建设方面仍较薄弱,学科影响力尚需进一步提升。“十四五”期间,我国档案学科仍将关注人文、管理和技术三大研究取向,更注重这三者的交叉与融合,重点对文件档案管理数字转型、档案记忆理论与数字记忆、档案与数字人文、档案社会化趋向与文件档案管理理论创新、文件档案治理、古文书与档案事业发展史、文献遗产保护与修复及档案学专业教育改革与发展等领域开展研究,开创开放、多元、创新的学科新局面。 相似文献
8.
数字时代下的古文书学档案思想和档案后保管思想分别代表了两种不同的档案学发展路径,使得当前以“三位一体”为主要内容的档案学基础理论在司法行政和文化社会两种语境下产生一定的错位。本文主要采用比较理论研究方法,引入组织理论,建立了正式、非正式组织—沟通的四维分析框架,将古文书学档案思想和档案后保管思想的实质放置在上述框架下进行阐释、对比并作一致化理解。论文在此基础上探讨档案学基础理论适应性发展问题,从认知理论和方法理论相统一的角度提出一种可能性,认知理论研究从档案管理经验归纳延伸到档案现象认知构建,方法理论研究从归纳档案管理原则标准延伸到关于档案制度正式化的深入思考。 相似文献
9.
10.
Archival objects in motion: historians’ appropriation of sources in nineteenth-century Austria and Switzerland 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Daniela Saxer 《Archival Science》2010,10(3):315-331
This contribution examines the social, material, and epistemic practices of historians and their counterparts engaged in the
textual and visual reproduction of historical sources in nineteenth-century Austria and Switzerland. The Schweizerische Urkundenregister (1863–1877), a Swiss register of medieval charters, and the Monumenta graphica medii aevi (1859–1883), an Austrian collection of photographic facsimiles of medieval sources, were both intended to make historical sources accessible
outside the archives in the framework of national history. The article analyzes institutional collaborations and the social
interactions among the actors involved and follows the trajectories of the mobilized archival objects. These projects for
national source publications appear as a negotiated social practice, in which archival objects were dislocated conceptually
as well as materially in order to be stabilized and reified again in new infrastructures of research. The conflicts surrounding
the projects reveal disputes about authority over the archival records, their significance, and the techniques required to
represent them properly, and show how the emergence of scholarly source publications accompanied a conscious erasure of older
contexts of meaning. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
《Journal Of Archival Organization》2013,11(1-2):149-175
SUMMARY This article examines the evolution of a national register of the archives of science and technology in Australia and the related development of an archival informatics focused initially on people and their relationships to archival materials. The register was created in 1985 as an in-house tool for the Australian Science Archives Project of the University of Melbourne. Its potential as a public reference guide for historians of science and technology soon became apparent. The story of the computerisation and publication of the register provides the background for the examination of the use of archival authority records as a means of finding better ways of connecting archives with their potential users. The success of this approach led to demands from the community for a generic database tool using a framework based on the authoritative entities associated with archival materials-an activity that we started to call contextual information management. The Online Heritage Resource Manager (OHRM) was created in response to these calls, and the story of its development as a tool for mapping networks of contextual information is told in the latter part of the article. 相似文献
14.
运用“遥读”和“细读”相结合的方法,对2021年《档案学研究》和《档案学通讯》所刊发的220篇学术论文进行研究力量布局与研究主题分布分析,发现高等院校仍是档案学研究的主体力量,但国家档案局的研究力量突显。2021年中国档案学研究主要关注“档案治理”“档案学基础理论”“电子文件管理”“中国古文书学”“档案与数字人文”“档案资源服务”“档案教育”等主题,并呈现出较强的本土性和跨学科性。未来中国档案学研究仍应加强本土化研究,构建具有中国特色的档案学理论体系;要关注“人”的需求,体现档案学研究的人文主义;需关注跨学科问题,实现档案学与其他学科之间理论与方法的双向互动。 相似文献
15.
16.
The Archival Bond 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Luciana Duranti 《Archives and Museum Informatics》1997,11(3-4):213-218
This paper presents the concept of archival bond as formulated by archival science and used in a research project carried out at the University of British Columbia, entitled The Preservation of Electronic Records. Being one of the essential components of the record, the concept of archival bond is discussed in the context of the traditional diplomatic and archival definitions of records, and its function in demonstrating the reliability and authenticity of records is shown. The most serious challenge with which we are confronted is to make explicit and preserve intact over the long term the archival bond between electronic and non electronic records belonging in the same aggregations. 相似文献
17.
The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*
This article presents the concept of electronic record as articulated by the first phase of the InterPARES (International research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems) Project (1999–2001) and discusses it in light of the findings of the second phase of the Project (2002–2006). While InterPARES 1 focused on records produced and/or maintained in databases and document management systems, InterPARES 2 examined records produced and/or maintained in interactive, experiential and dynamic environments. The authors describe the characteristics of these environments and of the entities found in them in the course of case studies conducted on systems used for carrying out artistic, scientific and e-government activities, and propose the new concept of record that InterPARES 2 is eleborating, which expands on that formulated by InterPARES 1.The authors would like to thank InterPARES 2 research assistant Randy Preston for his careful editing and constructive criticisms. Some of his suggestions have been incorporated in the text of this article. 相似文献
18.
19.
This article presents the concept of electronic record as articulated by the first phase of the InterPARES (International
research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems) Project (1999-2001) and discusses it in light of the findings
of the second phase of the Project (2002-2006). While InterPARES 1 focused on records produced and/or maintained in databases
and document management systems, InterPARES 2 examined records produced and/or maintained in interactive, experiential and
dynamic environments. The authors describe the characteristics of these environments and of the entities found in them in
the course of case studies conducted on systems used for carrying out artistic, scientific and e-government activities, and
propose the new concept of record that InterPARES 2 is eleborating, which expands on that formulated by InterPARES 1.
The authors would like to thank InterPARES 2 research assistant Randy Preston for his careful editing and constructive criticisms.
Some of his suggestions have been incorporated in the text of this article. 相似文献
20.
In 2010, in response to the Australian Government’s November 2009 apology to Forgotten Australians and former child migrants, a scoping study was undertaken by the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) to assess the options for a national ‘Find and Connect’ service to allow people to locate and access relevant records and have recourse to support services. The scoping study noted that Pathways, a web-based public knowledge space and a product of the Victorian ‘Who Am I?’ research project, was a community-based information resource without equal in the out-of-home care sector in Australia or indeed internationally. The scoping team made the observation that Pathways, due to its quality of content and coherent structure, appeared to be based on a set of principles and wondered what they were. In response the research team set about articulating the principles that underpinned their approach to archival documentation and the use of digital technologies – principles that had emerged through more than two decades of public domain, archive-focussed projects. This paper presents those ten principles and discusses them within the context of Pathways and the ‘Who Am I?’ project. The principles played a key role in FaCHSIA adopting Pathways as the model for the national Find and Connect database and web resource, launched on 15 November 2011. The principles underpin community knowledge building in the fourth or pluralised dimension of the Records Continuum. The paper ultimately argues that all stakeholders (all people and organisations connected with records) should have the ability to contribute to the utilisation of those records through the improvement of documentation and that some archival systems do have a duty of care to ensure they can inter-operate with community-generated knowledge. 相似文献