共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 640 毫秒
1.
基于《中文社会科学引文索引》（2000—2007）引用数据,运用引文分析法,对艺术学论文引用图书的相关出版社进行统计,提出对艺术学最具学术影响力的百家出版社,对部分出版社进行简要介绍,论证其在艺术学领域的影响。 相似文献
2.
借助《中文社会科学引文索引》（2000—2007）数据,利用引文分析法,对文化学领域论文引用的图书出版社进行统计,推出对文化学最有影响力的百家出版社,给出部分出版社的简要介绍,并论证它们在文化学领域的影响作用。 相似文献
3.
引文扩散的动态过程更为全面地展现了科学论文的质量与影响。本文从引文扩散的视角出发,在传统引文指标基础上引入altmetrics,试图从论文学术影响力与社会影响力两个方面综合探究不同引文扩散模式下论文的影响力情况及各指标间的相关性。研究结果发现,规则型、持续型引文扩散模式下,altmetrics与引用呈正相关关系,同时具有高学术影响力和社会影响力;不规则引文扩散模式下,引用与社交媒体传播量不具有相关性,高社会影响力并不总代表着高学术影响力;文献发表早期,altmetrics对引用具有推动和促进作用。本文从扩散视角结合altmetrics对不同引文扩散模式论文影响力进行分析,为科学研究成果影响力评价构建多维度指标、提升学术影响力提供了借鉴参考。 相似文献
4.
5.
基于CSSC(I1998—2014)数据,以西藏民族大学(原为西藏民族学院)民族学(藏学)一级学科的具有高级职称的教师的来源文献和被引文献(1998—2014)为研究对象,采用文献计量学分析方法,运用各年引文量和被引量、科研基金资助论文、作者、学科、期刊发文、被引频次等指标进行分析,是对我校民族学(藏学)一级学科17年来研究成果的展示,旨在探索这些研究成果的特色,分析其学术影响力,为我校民族学(藏学)一级学科建设提供智力支持和参考依据。 相似文献
6.
目的:探索出版社学术评估的定量方法.方法:选择维普引文数据库,采用引文计量的方法.对出版社进行引文频次汇总,并按频次进行排序,计算43家出版社的h指数.结果:除了人民卫生出版社的h指数为193.90%的出版社h指数均在50以下.被引频次排名前100位的图书中,人民卫生出版社占62种,其余出版社均在6种以下.结论:h指数可以作为一个评价出版社学术影响力的指标. 相似文献
7.
文章利用知识图谱工具CitespaceIII,以CSSCI(中国社会科学引文索引)数据库中2000~2011年我国民族学来源期刊发文及引用数据为数据来源,绘制并分析了十二年间年我国民族学关键词共现图谱、文献共被引图谱、作者共被引图谱及作者共现图谱,可视化的呈现了我国民族学这十二年来的研究热点、重要影响力的学者及民族学科研合作情况。 相似文献
8.
借助《中文社会科学引文索引》(2000—2007)的数据,采用引文分析法,对国内政治学论文引用图书的出版社进行统计分析,推出对政治学最有学术影响的百家国内外出版社,予以简要评价,并论证它们在政治学领域的重要影响。 相似文献
9.
随着我国出版社大规模企业化转型,学术出版社在取得显著经济效益的同时也出现了各种问题。有效平衡学术出版社"经济市场"与"学术市场"之间关系,不但需要经济效益测评,更需要利用学术影响力指标加以分学科引导。用于出版社学术影响力分析的三类文献计量指标,是指学术性指标、专业性指标与辐射性指标,它们分别反映出版社的整体学术影响力、分学科影响力与跨学科辐射力。实证研究结果表明,这三类文献计量指标可以从引文分析角度客观揭示出版社的学术影响力及其学科分布,从而有效引导学术出版社保持学科独特性,发挥应有的学术影响力。 相似文献
10.
11.
Melanie Ramdarshan Bold 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2012,28(4):345-358
Digital publishing has been considered as a panacea to bridge the gaps between different sized publishing companies: allowing small, independent companies to compete on an equal footing with cross-media conglomerates. However, this research discovered that Scottish publishers are not capitalising on new technology and new platforms for dissemination: this is detrimental to the authors they represent. The empirical research found that the majority of Scottish publishers are not fostering intellectual property rights (IPR) effectively across international markets and new media: The failure to do this means that the operational practices of the Scottish publishing industry are not in harmony with the burgeoning digital publishing environment. If Scottish publishers continue with current practices it will become increasingly difficult for them to compete in the national and international publishing environment. This study concludes that only by better training and knowledge exchange, in matters of rights exploitation and digital publishing, can Scottish publishers compete in the international arena and contribute to, and benefit financially from, the knowledge economy. 相似文献
12.
《Slavic & East European Information Resources》2013,14(3-4):13-50
Abstract Croatia considers the book a priority cultural product. Today various forces, both positive and negative, affect publishing in Croatia. A survey of traditional publishing in Croatia based on statistical data collected by the author in the Croatian ISBN Agency over the past 8 years introduces the main topic. The author then reports on the results of a survey of 1,000 publishers, aimed at establishing which medium publishers used for their books between 1993 and the beginning of 1998, the period when book production passed from printed to digital form. The research results show that modern electronic book forms have been gradually developing in Croatia in parallel with traditional publishing. The number of publishers producing books in electronic format is not great. However, the fact that nearly a quarter of the publishers who returned the questionnaire do produce electronic books, shows that Croatian publishers accept new technologies as they appear in countries with a developed publishing industry, onlyin amuch more modest scope. The author mentions electronic books published by as many as forty publishers, and gives a survey of online-bookstores in Croatia. Special attention is paid to book legislation in the country. As a conclusion the author proposes an incentive for electronic publishing. 相似文献
13.
传统出版社正大规模参与开放出版,这是各方博弈的必然。为把握传统出版社参与开放出版的模式与政策,指出传统出版社初步的多维度分析框架,并通过实例分析传统出版社全开放出版模式和复合出版模式,提出传统出版社在如何推进开放出版、如何调整权益关系、如何处理论文处理费等方面所面对的挑战。 相似文献
14.
This study examines aspects of scholarly journal publishing in the Nordic countries. On average half of Nordic journals publish online. In most Nordic countries, commercial publishers predominate; however, in Finland the majority are society publishers. The number of open access journals is low, in line with international figures. There is concern to maintain local languages in journal publishing. A majority of the journals publishing in local languages are within social science, humanities, and arts; the STM sector publishes in English. English‐language publications are favoured in research assessments, international recognition, and impact, while the visibility of local‐language scholarly journals in international databases is low. The Nordbib program supports Nordic scholarly journals and fosters co‐operation with publishing companies and learned societies over migration to e‐publishing; it also supports open access. The article discusses future challenges for journal publishing, pointing out the problems of small journal publishers and the need for co‐operation between stakeholders. 相似文献
15.
《Library & information science research》2006,28(2):208-234
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the concept of book self-publishing for fiction and nonfiction began to loom large in the North American publishing universe. As traditional mainstream publishers consolidated and were often loathe to take chances on unknown writers whose books might not turn immediate profits, some authors found that fewer and fewer publishing venues were open to them. As a result, new self-publishers—collectively called “author services” or print-on-demand (POD) publishers—appeared alongside subsidy (or vanity) publishers. Against the background of an increasing corporatization of mainstream publishing, book self-publishing can theoretically be situated as one of the last bastions of independent publishing. This article examines how academic and public libraries dealt with the book self-publishing phenomena during 1960–2004. To what extent did libraries collect fiction and nonfiction published by self-publishing houses? Can any patterns be discerned in their collecting choices? Did libraries choose to collect more titles from “author services” publishers than subsidy publishers? 相似文献
16.
科技期刊出版业由传统的出版与经营管理转变为数字化出版,利用电子商务平台进行数字化、网络化营销已成为科技期刊的发展方向.认为:可开展基于科技期刊自建网站的电子商务营销;通过专业的电子商务平台开通科技期刊的旗舰营销店,实现科技期刊的多元化、多渠道的电子商务营销;通过手机付费平台进行科技期刊的网络化营销.科技期刊利用电子商务平台营销过程中需重视多方合作并加强管理,加强电子商务平台的内容建设及服务营销,加大培养电子商务专业化营销与管理人才的力度,不断扩大科技期刊的社会效益与经济效益. 相似文献
17.
This study investigates the current status and attitudes towards academic e-book publishing by mainland Chinese academic publishers through an online survey. This study collected survey data from 49 authoritative academic publishers in China, focusing on their e-book sales profiles and their perceptions of how e-book sales affect publishers and libraries. The data reveals that China's academic e-book industry is still at an early development stage and has a relatively small market. The findings show significant differences in the willingness and attitudes towards e-book publishing between SSH publishers and STEM publishers, and also demonstrate that the enhancement of the demand for e-books by academic libraries promotes the process of the digital transformation of academic publishers. This study then argues that Chinese academic publishers need to further improve the quality of academic e-books, accelerate the transition from academic content providers to academic content service providers, and strengthen their cooperation with stakeholders. 相似文献
18.
The article processing charge (APC) is currently the primary method of funding professionally published open access (OA) peer‐reviewed journals. The pricing principles of 77 OA publishers publishing over 1,000 journals using APCs were studied and classified. The most commonly used pricing method is a single fixed fee, which can either be the same for all of a publisher's journals or individually determined for each journal. Fees are usually only levied for publication of accepted papers, but there are some journals that also charge submission fees. Instead of fixed prices, many publishers charge by the page or have multi‐tiered fees depending on the length of articles. The country of origin of the author can also influence the pricing, in order to facilitate publishing for authors from developing countries. 相似文献
19.
Cristina Mussinelli 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2011,27(3):288-295
The Editech 2011 conference identified that publishers need to follow new paths and experiment more rapidly in all the areas
of business related to a growing number of new digital publishing activities. Most important they need to rethink all the
relationships actually in place with all the other factors in the publishing value chain and then radically reinvent their
role in the quickly changing digital and ebook businesses. It is clear that now most of the changes are driven by the big
three Google, Amazon, Apple and the publishers are following. However, especially in Europe the publishers have different
approaches based on a brief review of selected key papers presented from different countries and sectors of the digital publishing
industry. 相似文献
20.
This study examines the extent of concentration in the journal publishing industry. A number of aspects are considered: publishers, journal impacts, countries, and languages. For journals indexed in JCR from 1997 to 2009, just 0.2% of publishers produce 50% of journals and articles, and 0.3% of publishers account for the top 50% of citations, impact factors and immediacy indices. More than a half of publishers in JCR are from four countries: USA, UK, Germany and Japan. In addition, more than a half of journals come from the USA and UK. Examining the publishers' interactions in terms of buying and selling journals shows the extent of change by acquisition, and the acquisition links between publishers. The findings confirm that the international market of journal publishing is essentially dominated by a few publishers. 相似文献