共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 359 毫秒
1.
预印本是未经同行评审就上传到公共服务器上的学术论文,目的是供开放获取,促进新知识的广泛传播。文章通过分析预印本和传统学术期刊的区别,梳理国内外主要预印本平台的发展,预印本发展中面临的挑战和困难,以及国内外主要学术出版机构对预印本的政策。提出预印本应加强质量审核机制,完善自组织评议机制,与传统期刊有效对接,共同促进开放科研,打造健康、快捷、权威的网络学术生态圈。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
国外期刊论文同行评议创新态势述评 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：1
[目的/意义]综述国外期刊论文同行评议的创新实践,以期为国内学术出版提供参考。[方法/过程]通过对国外期刊论文同行评议的创新实践加以述评,分析其优势和挑战,总结创新实践的整体趋势。[结果/结论]预印本和发表后同行评议反映了人们对同行评议更快捷的期待,非选择性同行评议和注册报告反映了人们对同行评议更客观的期待,开放同行评议和协作同行评议反映了人们对同行评议更公平的期待,而这些创新实践具有各自的优势及挑战。国外期刊论文同行评议的创新实践总体上呈现出加快发表速度、拓宽发文范围、弱化以刊评文、促进科学民主和认证审稿贡献的趋势。 相似文献
5.
预印本是开放科学环境下学术交流的重要方式。本文分析了预印本发展对学术出版体系的积极作用,归纳了现行的科技期刊预印本政策,以及设立预印本编辑、将论文同行评审与预印本开放评论相结合等创新实践;探讨了预印本与科技期刊的融合出版流程,以及预印本平台与单刊建立合作关系、科技期刊出版商开辟预印本专区等融合发展模式。在上述基础上,提出推进我国预印本与科技期刊融合发展的建议,包括加快预印本相关政策制定、建立预印本与科技期刊平台的互通互联机制、推进同行评审与开放评论相结合的论文审查模式应用等,以期促进新型学术出版体系的构建。 相似文献
6.
7.
〔摘要〕 论述电子预印本系统虽然无同行评议,但仍具较高学术水平的原因。通过对国内外著名电子预印本系统的深入研究,试图分析出其在新用户注册、预印本提交、存储和发布等环节所采取的质量控制措施,并总结其内在质量控制机制,以期对国内电子预印本系统的建立和发展有所帮助。 相似文献
8.
随着全球科学技术迅猛发展,科研产出大幅增加,对新成果的优先发表权的争夺变得越来越激烈,出版效率成为科技期刊服务能力的重要体现.预印本平台在疫情期间的快速出版服务满足了尽快共享科研成果、指导疫情防控的迫切需要.本文调研了具有代表性的国际预印本平台的出版服务内容、服务技术和服务理念,结合我国科技期刊现有的同行评议和出版服务问题进行分析,为我国期刊创新出版服务、增强办刊能力、提高国际影响力提供借鉴和参考. 相似文献
9.
随着全球科学技术迅猛发展,科研产出大幅增加,对新成果的优先发表权的争夺变得越来越激烈,出版效率成为科技期刊服务能力的重要体现.预印本平台在疫情期间的快速出版服务满足了尽快共享科研成果、指导疫情防控的迫切需要.本文调研了具有代表性的国际预印本平台的出版服务内容、服务技术和服务理念,结合我国科技期刊现有的同行评议和出版服务问题进行分析,为我国期刊创新出版服务、增强办刊能力、提高国际影响力提供借鉴和参考. 相似文献
10.
科学交流载体的演变、开放获取运动的推动及学术出版模式的创新,使预印本逐步成为备受关注的科学交流模式。在相关主体的联合推进下,学术界逐渐接受和认可预印本的学术交流价值。本文梳理了预印本学术交流模式演化历程,将预印本学术交流的发展分为四个阶段：小型学术团体驱动的探索实验期(1990年前)、学科与技术驱动的初创时期(1991—2012年)、多主体驱动的极速扩张时期(2013—2019年)和疫情影响下的加速发展时期(2020年至今)。从平台类型、出版融合、技术创新、学术社区团体、成果认可和运营经费等方面出发,总结归纳预印本学术交流模式的发展特征,并对我国预印本学术交流体系的发展提出对策和建议：(1)加强预印本著作权认可,保障预印本首发权认定;(2)促进预印本和期刊协同发展,形成统一的开放学术出版流程;(3)构建预印本论文开放评议机制,化解“以刊评文”难题;(4)营造预印本学术交流氛围,培育中国预印本文化;(5)开放互联形成集群效应,提升预印本平台的国际影响力。图1。参考文献44。 相似文献
11.
Responses from almost 1,250 academic authors around the world were analysed to obtain their views on electronic publishing of learned journals. Currently, having a print version of journals is still more important to them than an electronic version. The issue of greatest importance to authors and readers is the continuing availability of back volumes, and there are strong concerns about pricing of electronic journals. The potential gains in publication speed through publishing electronically appear not to be a priority. Electronic preprint and reprint archives are used very little at present, with the exception of the physics and mathematics communities. Of all publisher‐mediated tasks, the peer‐review process is the most valued, followed by provision of citation‐linking. Respondents' views of future developments in electronic publishing are also explored. 相似文献
12.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2020,46(5):102187
The COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to a flood of papers and preprints, has placed multiple challenges on academic publishing, the most obvious one being sustained integrity under the pressure to publish quickly. There are risks of this high volume-to-speed ratio. Many letters, editorials, and supposedly “peer reviewed” papers in ranked and indexed journals were published in a matter of days, suggesting that peer review was either fleeting or non-existential, or that papers were rapidly approved by editors based on their perceived interest and topicality, rather than on their intrinsic academic value. In academic publishing circles, the claim of “peer review”, when in fact it has not been conducted, is a core characteristic of “predatory publishing”, and is also a “fake” element that may undermine efforts in recent years to build trust in science's budding serials crisis. While the world is still centrally focused on COVID-19, the issue of “predatory publishing” is being ignored, or not being given sufficient attention. The risks to the scholarly community, academic publishing and ultimately public health are at stake when exploitative and predatory publishing are left unchallenged. 相似文献
13.
网络学术期刊运作模式研究 总被引：5，自引：1，他引：5
在界定网络学术期刊的基础上，从国际化水平、稿件接收与评审、出版形式、读者服务、经费与版权问题、平行载体等方面探讨网络学术期刊的运作模式，指出其对构建新的学术交流体系和形成新的学术出版格局的意义。 相似文献
14.
15.
基于ISMTE首届亚洲会议的召开,对会议议题——出版伦理、出版数据监测与研究成果评价指标、开放获取、行业协会资源、出版技术和平台、出版实践新标准、投审稿系统、作者服务、编辑部运作等进行综述.综述分为《学术出版的最佳实践:ISMTE首届亚洲会议综述》(Ⅰ)(Ⅱ)2篇.本篇综述的内容对象为出版伦理、开放获取、出版数据监测和评价指标.通过此会议综述,期望对国内的学术出版会议的举办、议题的设置、编辑部的运作等提供参考和借鉴,从而使国内的学术期刊受益且更好地发展,为国家的创新建设提供专业服务. 相似文献
16.
Xiang REN 《Learned Publishing》2013,26(3):197-205
A growing number of online journals and academic platforms are adopting light peer review or ‘publish then filter’ models of scholarly communication. These approaches have the advantage of enabling instant exchanges of knowledge between academics and are part of a wider search for alternatives to traditional peer review and certification processes in scholarly publishing. However, establishing credibility and identifying the correct balance between communication and scholarly rigour remains an important challenge for digital communication platforms targeting academic communities. This paper looks at a highly influential, government‐backed, open publishing platform in China: Science Paper Online, which is using transparent post‐publication peer‐review processes to encourage innovation and address systemic problems in China's traditional academic publishing system. There can be little doubt that the Chinese academic publishing landscape differs in important ways from counterparts in the United States and Western Europe. However, this article suggests that developments in China also provide important lessons about the potential of digital technology and government policy to facilitate a large‐scale shift towards more open and networked models of scholarly communication. 相似文献
17.
随着学术期刊传播深度和广度的推进,刊载的论文不断被相关专家研读,发布的成果反复接受同行的验证,一些论文的作者也因此被当作某个学科或行业的人才被发现。学术期刊在编辑出版发行过程中,通过同行评议,编辑与作者的交流互动,作者的科研成果被转化成生产力,作者与读者的学术争鸣,给研读者以思想启迪、学术熏陶、写作参考等方式,实现了人才的培养功能。 相似文献
18.