共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
市场经济体制下"政府、市场、大学"新型关系的研究总报告(二) 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
政府、市场、大学三种力量对高等教育的作用分别体现在制定高等教育发展战略与规划、高等教育资源配置、高等教育质量监控保障等方面。我国社会主义市场经济体制下的巨大社会变革 ,促进“政府与大学”之间的关系发生了深刻的变革 ,因此 ,建立新型的“政府、市场、大学”之间关系面临着诸多问题。本项研究在立足解决有关问题的基础上 ,研究提出由构建“新型公共教育权力结构”、构建新型“政府、市场、大学”之间良性互动机制、建立现代大学制度等三个方面内容共同构成的新型高等教育治理结构 ,即新型的“政府、市场、大学”关系的构想。 相似文献
2.
高等教育供给存在的主要问题表现为机会供给数量不足、产品或服务供给质量不佳,无法满足高等教育需求.从利益相关者分析框架来看,高等教育与其利益相关者政府、高校、社会组织和个体之间具有多重利益诉求.利益诉求的矛盾与冲突提供了高等教育供给制度创新的动力:坚持利益均衡原则,搭建利益协调平台,探索政府“元治理”下的利益相关者共同治理,架构普及、开放、终身高等教育模式以维护个人“根本利益诉求”,还要加强制度环境建设,拓宽利益相关者利益诉求渠道. 相似文献
3.
克拉克（Clark）的三角协调模型（coordinate triangle]一直被引为经典。它将国家高等教育系统置于“三角张力”之中,认为高等教育系统的位置取决于三股反方向的力量（即国家权力、学术力量以及市场力量）共同作用的结果。这三种力量的不同配置,形成了不同的高等教育管理模式,法国主要是以政府控制为中心的管理模式。由于评估和合同制度的介入,国家和高等教育之间关系的发生了变化,由原来的控制模式转变治理模式。政府在高等教育领域中由单一控制而转为与高校的协商及对话。 相似文献
4.
高等教育资源配置转换过程是学术、市场、政府三种配置力量不断调整与选择的过程。“三种配置力量制衡”模型可用来描述在三种配置力量的作用下能够实现资源相对优化配置的约束条件。对改革开放以来我国高等教育资源配置制度转换过程的考察表明,确立在法律框架下的产权主体和产权制度,确立政府在新的市场经济与法制框架下的行为“重构”,是实现资源配置相对优化的基本条件,也是约束条件。大学组织治理模式深受社会制度的约束,我们应该研究它的不同组织治理模式与市场、政府、学术三种力量制衡背后的制度关系,从中把握某种规律和变迁趋势。 相似文献
5.
高等教育项目制是公共财政支出项目制向教育领域的延伸,经过不断地融合与发展,逐渐内嵌于高等教育治理之中.作为一种新型治理模式,项目制符合高等教育重点建设效率优先的逻辑,将抽象的高等教育发展需求转化为具体的项目为高等教育重点建设发展服务,其"集中力量办大事"的制度优势得以凸显,为高等教育重点建设构成"四力合一"的动力系统,但是这种由国家主导并且仰赖于科层制组织模式的治理模式也存在一些弊端.在高等教育现代化治理过程中要通过明确政府与大学间的权力边界、明晰高校行政权力与学术权力之间的关系、拓宽高校资源获取渠道等方式实现高等教育的可持续发展. 相似文献
6.
通过建构大学内外部治理之间的新型关系以实现中国大学治理现代化,是推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的题中应有之义。正确理解大学内外部治理之间的复杂关系,需要从价值逻辑、政治逻辑、行政逻辑、社会逻辑和文化逻辑等多向度关系逻辑加以把握。依据不同关系逻辑的主导地位和影响力强弱,将大学内外部治理关系调适模式划分为科层式调适模式、法人型调适模式和市场化调适模式等三类。在客观分析中国大学内外部治理关系现状的基础上,立足大学治理的中国特色对其前景进行了展望。最后,围绕“构建政府、学校、社会之间新型关系,更好发挥市场作用”这一目标,提出了以实现党的领导、政府主导、社会参与、高校自主与有效市场相结合的中国特色大学内外部治理关系调适模式的建构策略。 相似文献
7.
地方大学治理:特征、理念与模式 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Liu Hui Director professor Ph.D. at Higher Educational Research Institute of Guangzhou University 《教育研究》2008,(7)
地方大学治理是指在地方大学、地方政府、社会和市场的互动与合作中谋求地方大学的善治,其治理结构和功能均呈现独特性,相应的治理模式也展现出复杂性。地方大学的治理模式应当是基于治理理论和办学特色基础上的价值选择,选择行走于认识论和政治论高等教育哲学之间的第三条道路——现实主义价值观。地方大学的治理条件包括健全保障大学治理的法律法规系统,规范地方政府在大学治理中的角色,变资源配置的行政主导型为市场引导型,建立现代大学制度。 相似文献
8.
《高教发展与评估》2017,(1)
政府、社会和高校的三元治理模式,强调高等教育管理权在政府、社会团体和高校之间的分散和制衡。三元治理模式的关键是制度创新,包括宏观上政府简政放权的制度创新、中观社会团体的制度创新和微观高校自主权的制度创新。宏观政府的制度创新,主要是指政府的简政放权,把一些权力和职能让渡给社会团体和高校,并建立和完善相关的机构和制度。中央和省级政府建立高等教育发展规划委员会、高等教育质量监督与管理委员会及高等教育拨款委员会。中观社会团体的制度创新,不仅要关注到政府权责内的全国性重大问题,还要关注高校实践领域的各种具体问题。出台社会团体法人资格法规;增设有关社会团体管理权限的法律规定;制定社会团体运行模式的政策。微观高校自主权的制度创新,需要从确立高校的法人实体地位着手,理顺高校内部治理机构中的党政和教师、学生及相关利益主体的关系,并以党政关系为主轴进行制度创新:制定高校法人实体的相关法律制度;加快高校内董事会制的改革,实行高校内领导体制董事会制。 相似文献
9.
10.
高等教育治理的内涵主要包括:为促进高等教育和高等教育机构健康发展,政府发展教育、提供服务的机制,利益相关者表达诉求、监督效能的机制,以及高等教育体系和高等教育机构履行使命、开放管理的机制。上述各方面均涵盖了从低端到高端不同的实现方式,各个国家在不同时期根据本国的国情采取了不同的组合,从而形成了形态各异的高等教育治理模式。随着高等教育在经济社会发展中地位的提升,社会参与高等教育治理的广度和深度也将随之发生正向变化,呈现出规律性的特征。 相似文献
11.
12.
Private higher education in Australia 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Diana L. Stone 《Higher Education》1990,20(2):143-159
In the post World War Two era and prior to the mid 1980s Australia has been characterised by exclusive public provision, financing and regulation of higher education. The 1980s, however, have been marked by considerable turmoil which culminated in the 1988 White Paper. Circumstances provided by the reform of the higher education system, the booming overseas student market and unmet domestic demand have provided a window of opportunity for private providers. This paper charts the growth of private provision, federal and state government responses and the pressures for subsidy and regulation. The paper concludes that the policies of both levels of government are hastening the development of what Geiger (1988) defines as a peripheral private sector of higher education in Australia. 相似文献
13.
地方高校发展与高等教育政策调整 总被引：11，自引：0，他引：11
近年来,我国地方高校在规模迅猛扩张的同时,普遍陷入了多重发展困境之中。从制度变迁的类型和路径依赖两个角度来看,这种困境产生的制度根源有两个:一是以中央政府为主体的激进式强制性制度变迁的局限性,二是对传统高等教育管理模式的路径依赖。今后高等教育政策调整必须遵循两个基本的指导思想:一是弥补激进式强制性制度变迁的局限,二是摆脱对传统高等教育管理方式的路径依赖。 相似文献
14.
高等教育评估中的中美两国政府行为之比较 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
本文分析了我国高等教育评估的形成背景、法律保障、地位作用以及我国政府在教育评估中的作用；同时还介绍了美国政府在高等教育评估中的特点；最后分析了美国高等教育评估的经验对我国高等教育评估的启示。 相似文献
15.
As part of the efforts to globalize higher education in Indonesia, internationalization and multiculturalism are two globalization behaviors that have been promoted across higher education institutions. This study investigated both these behaviors through a qualitative case study analysis of four state universities in the country. The authors found that firstly, the autonomy of state higher education institutions played a significant role for the implementation of internationalization programs which is related not only to the flexibility in designing international programs, opening study programs, or recruiting foreign lecturers, but also to the budget amount allocations by the government. Secondly, in developing multiculturalism serious considerations on the cultural stance of the institution and the unique ideology of that institution needs to be undertaken and integrated with the national ideology. Thirdly, the role of the government in making policies and encouraging state higher education institutions to be more autonomous is essential to advance higher education in internationalization and multiculturalism. 相似文献
16.
新大学运动与英国高等教育的近代化 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
DENG Yun-qing 《高等教育研究》2008,(1)
19世纪的英国新大学运动是一场规模巨大的高等教育改革运动。在功利主义的导引之下,英国高等教育在目标与职能、学科与课程等方面做出重大调整,对古典绅士教育传统进行了必要修正,有力地推进了英国高等教育的世俗化、平民化与泛智化进程。在这场改革运动中,英国高等教育调整了古典绅士教育与实用职业教育的关系,调整了政府与社会在高等教育中的角色定位,成功实现了传统与现代的兼容。 相似文献
17.
This paper is an attempt to analyse the present pattern of funding higher education in India and to discuss the desirability and feasibility of various alternative methods of funding the same. Higher education in India is basically a state funded sector. But as higher education benefits not only society at large, but also individuals specifically, and as it attracts relatively more privileged sections of the society, there is a rationale for shifting the financial burden to the individual domain from the social domain.It is argued here that given the resource constraints and equity considerations, financing higher education mostly from the general tax revenue may not be a desirable policy in the long run. Accordingly some of the alternative policy choices are discussed, including financing higher education from the public exchequer, student loans, graduate tax, student fees, and the role of the private sector. Among the available alternatives, it is argued that a discriminatory pricing mechanism would be relatively more efficient and equitable. While given the socioeconomic and political realities, the government has to continue to bear a large responsibility for funding higher education, instead of relying on a single form of funding, efforts should be made to evolve a model of funding that provides a mix of the various methods. It is also argued that fee and subsidy policies need to make distinctions across various layers and forms of higher education. 相似文献
18.
The present study aims to investigate the role of rankings in Kazakhstani higher education policy and their influence on a group of national universities in Kazakhstan. The analysis draws attention to the role of the Kazakhstani government and accreditation agencies in developing coercive and normative isomorphism in Kazakhstani higher education. The analysis of university missions and development strategies of a group of universities with a special status has revealed that national universities are pushed towards an Anglo-American model of a research university. Further research is suggested to assess the response of Kazakhstani higher education institutions (HEIs) to these coercive and normative pressures. 相似文献
19.
Public higher education in the Philippines 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
V. R. Cardozier 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1984,30(2):193-198
Summary Clearly, the national government of the Philippines has decided to increase the number and comprehensiveness of its public colleges and universities. While private colleges and universities are likely to dominate higher education in the Philippines for the remainer of this century, it appears that public, tax-supported higher education will become increasingly available there. The Philippines is not a wealthy country but it is devoting a substantial portion of its national resources to public higher education. In 1983, higher education received 2.85 percent of the national budget, a figure that has been rising for years. Compared with some highly developed countries, this is not a large percentage, but for a country that has traditionally relied on private higher education, it is a major and growing investment in the public sector.While many of the better universities in the Philippines are private, many other private educational institutions are small and struggling. As their financial resources become more limited, and as less expensive, tax-supported higher education becomes increasingly available, a lot of the struggling private colleges will probably close. This process is also being hastened by actions of the government to upgrade quality, for example in the case of the many private colleges that developed after World War II. In an attempt to improve the academic quality of these marginal institutions, the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports has been given extensive authority, and while its intrusion into private institutions has been modest by some measures, its requirements are affecting them all and will speed the demise of some. This is bound to lead to a stronger role for public higher education in the Philippines, a country that is striving diligently to improve the education and hence the quality of life of its people.The author is grateful to several officials of public and private colleges and universities whom he interviewed in the Philippines in March, 1983, and particularly to Mr. S.B. Bangug, Philippine Association of State Universities and Colleges, and Dr. Amado C. Dizon, Executive Vice President, Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities, who provided major assistance. 相似文献
20.
日本私立高等教育的经费来源呈现出多渠道的特点,主要包括政府财政资助、学费、捐款、学校经营创收等。其中,政府的财政资助是日本私立高等教育发展的重要保障,学费是私立高等教育经费的主要构成部分。探寻日本私立高等教育经费的构成及其特点,将对改变我国民办高等教育经费来源单一化的局面有所裨益。 相似文献