共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
庄钟春晓 《课程.教材.教法》2021,41(5):130-136
科学构建基于音乐学科素养的学业测评指标体系是对学生音乐学习进行监测和提升的重要前提。鉴于其在学业测评中的重要性,本研究借鉴现有研究中音乐测评框架建构的基本思路,从学科素养在该阶段课程标准中的表达入手,用行为描述法界定了中小学音乐学科核心素养的操作性定义;在此基础上从测评内容、测评过程、测评情境三个维度提出音乐学业测评框架;建立以“学科素养—课标内容—测评观测点”为纲的测评指标,以期进一步推进中小学音乐学业测评研究。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
教育部中等职业学校数学课程标准明确提出了基于学科核心素养的课程目标和学业质量要求,基于此分析数学课程学业水平测试原则,结合PISA的理论建构学业水平测试的主体框架,探索学业水平测试的主要方法,完善数学学业水平测试的体系,检验学生核心素养的达成,促进学生核心素养的发展,形成科学性好、通用性强、测评效度高的中职数学学业水平测评方案,探索基于素养的学业水平测评实现路径,能更好地监控数学课程的教学过程和评估教学效果,诊断存在问题,发挥质量测评的导向作用,为职业教育的发展决策提供依据和支撑。 相似文献
5.
生命观念、科学思维、科学探究和社会责任是高中生物学学科核心素养的重要维度。教师要落实学生生物学学科核心素养的培育,需要从研究教材入手,丰富核心素养培育的载体;优化教学设计,倡导探究式课堂教学;改进考试命题导向,呈现学科素养效果;拓展学生学习空间,丰富核心素养培育路径。 相似文献
6.
《中学政治教学参考》2019,(1)
<正>《中国考试》2018年第7期刊登了华南师范大学、教育部思想政治课程标准修订组核心成员陈友芳教授的《知识—语言—思维:学科素养导向下的思想政治学科测评体系新转向》一文,陈教授在文中结合高考评价体系的新特点、新趋势与新要求,从学科性质、测评路径与方式等角度,提出了构建以"学科知识、学科语言、学科思维"为主体的学科内容要素测评体系。该思路不仅有助于规范学业水平考试和升学考试的命题思路,完善高考改革的测评支撑体系; 相似文献
7.
学业水平测评对法治教育教学质量的提升具有重要引导功能。基于试题基本要素和素养立意导向,从典型性的法治情境、表现性的法治任务、综合性的法治知识、逻辑化的法治语言四个维度,探讨任务导向的学科逻辑深度融合测评框架构建,对于提升测评的信度与效度及法治观念培育的力度具有重要作用。 相似文献
8.
建构语文学科核心素养的测评框架是落实高中语文课程变革理念的内在要求。课程观念变革之际,核心素养评价发展趋势为:评价目的由评价学习结果转向促进学习过程,强调测评框架的可解释性;评价内容由知识本位走向关注对学科本质的深度理解;评价工具的设计强调测试任务的综合性与实践性。据此,本研究建构以情境为依托,以语言实践活动为载体,以实践活动中表征出的关键认知能力为核心的测评框架。通过对测试数据的分析发现,构建的语文学科核心素养测评框架结构合理并具有可操作性,能够为语文学科核心素养的课程评价提供一定参考。 相似文献
9.
数学学科核心素养测评框架观照六大数学学科核心素养,包括数学知识、问题解决、数学思维三个维度,蕴含数学课程主题内容.以此测评框架为基础,利用专家咨询法与文本分析法,对2020年数学新高考Ⅰ卷进行分析研究发现,数学新高考Ⅰ卷与课程标准之间的一致性表现一般,在一定程度上具有一致性,但未达到统计学意义上的显著一致性水平;试卷凸显了对数学学科核心素养的测查,但考查处于中等水平,侧重对数学运算与逻辑推理两个数学学科核心素养的测查,对数学思维的考查有待加强.指向数学学科核心素养教学要把握内容主线,夯实学生数学基础知识;创设问题情境,凸显学生问题解决过程;强化数学表达,提升学生数学思维品质. 相似文献
10.
科学思维是义务教育科学学科核心素养之一,关注科学思维的评价对促进小学生科学思维的发展具有重要意义。基于知识深度（Depth of Knowledge）理论模型构建了深度学习视角下的科学思维测评框架，并以“电磁铁”为背景编制测评工具。经过样本施测和项目反应理论Rasch模型的核验，证明测评工具符合模型预期，能够区分不同科学思维能力水平的学生。 相似文献
11.
《Educational Assessment》2013,18(3):203-235
An important development in the context of recent moves toward alternative, performance-based assessment has been the emergence of curriculum profiles. These profiles are assessment tools that allow teachers to make judgments about student achievement with reference to key curriculum outcomes in different subject areas. In this article, six dimensions of curriculum profiles are identified: function-purpose, curriculum coverage, criterion referencing, validity-reliability. manageability, and interpretability. The extent to which each dimension is present in three recently developed curriculum profiling systems—the Australian National Profiles, the Victoria (Australia) Profiles, and the National Curriculum Assessment in England and Wales—is examined. This article highlights the fact that tensions exist among many of these dimensions and examines how the tensions have been addressed within each of the systems. The article concludes with a consideration of the implications of international research on curriculum profiles for the development and implementation of performance-based assessments in the United States. 相似文献
12.
13.
随着知识生产模式的现代转型,大学科研活动面临日益加重的社会问责,科研评价关注的焦点逐渐从重视科研数量与质量的内部评价转向注重科研社会贡献度与影响力的外部评价。在大学卓越科研评估的基础上,2018年澳大利亚政府引入了社会互动与影响力评价。作为大学卓越科研评估的配套评价机制,社会互动与影响力评价以其更加精细化、立体化的指标体系设计,引导大学在科研活动全过程中积极与政府、产业及社会进行互动和协作,较好地兼顾了结果评价与过程评价,突出了社会贡献能力培育与机制建设,充分挖掘了科研评价的激励与导向作用。借鉴社会互动与影响力评价的评估思路,我国在清理“五唯”的过程中应明确建立质量与贡献并重的科研绩效评价体系,对大学科研的社会互动过程与实际贡献给予更多关注。 相似文献
14.
An assessment‐oriented design‐based research model was applied to existing inquiry‐oriented multimedia programs in astronomy, biology, and ecology. Building on emerging situative theories of assessment, the model extends prevailing views of formative assessment for learning by embedding “discursive” formative assessment more directly into the curriculum. Three twenty‐hour curricula were designed and aligned to content standards, and three levels of assessments were developed and used to assess and enhance learning for each curriculum. These assessments included three or four informal “activity‐oriented” quizzes and discursive formative feedback rubrics supporting collective discourse, a “curriculum‐oriented” examination of individual conceptual understanding, and a “standards‐oriented” test measuring aggregated achievement of targeted standards. After two design‐research cycles, worthwhile scientific argumentation and statistically significant gains were attained for two of the three packages on the exam and test. Achievement gains were comparable to or larger than those of students in comparison classrooms. Many existing innovations could be enhanced and evaluated in this fashion; designing these strategies directly into innovations could have an even greater impact on discourse, understanding, and achievement. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 1240–1270, 2012 相似文献
15.
基于理科课程的分科设置和学生一般能力形成的事实,结合成年人的认知体验,在解析学科与科学等系列概念间差异的基础上,本文提出学生大脑“自重整假设”及悟性学习是人类天然认知方式的观点。从引导学生的开悟方向入手,探讨如何提高理科学科核心素养共同成分“科学思维”的培养效率。以物理学科为例,从学科素养和科学素养融合发展的视角,细致梳理如何通过悟性学习使学生在科学思维、科学本质认识、科学方法等多方面获得提升。 相似文献
16.
国内外科学教育界普遍认为科学实践与科学认识的协同发展是培养学生科学素养的重要途径。本文以化学学科为例,对科学实践与科学认识的内涵进行了解构,认为科学实践由“一般科学实践”“学科实验活动”“学科能力活动”组成,科学认识由“学科核心知识”“学科认识方式”组成。在阐述科学实践与科学认识协同发展必要性的基础上,提出了促进科学实践与科学认识协同发展的四维模型,对促进二者协同发展的教学设计提供了建议。 相似文献
17.
18.
Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
To improve assessments of academic achievement, test developers have been urged to use an “assessment triangle” that starts with research‐based models of cognition and learning [NRC (2001) Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press]. This approach has been successful in designing high‐quality reading and math assessments, but less progress has been made for assessments in content‐rich sciences such as biology. To rectify this situation, we applied the “assessment triangle” to design and evaluate new items for an instrument (ACORNS, Assessing Contextual Reasoning about Natural Selection) that had been proposed to assess students' use of natural selection to explain evolutionary change. Design and scoring of items was explicitly guided by a cognitive model that reflected four psychological principles: with development of expertise, (1) core concepts facilitate long‐term recall, (2) causally‐central features become weighted more strongly in explaining phenomena, (3) normative ideas co‐exist but increasingly outcompete naive ideas in reasoning, and (4) knowledge becomes more abstract and less specific to the learning situation. We conducted an evaluation study with 320 students to examine whether scores from our new ACORNS items could detect gradations of expertise, provide insight into thinking about evolutionary change, and predict teachers' assessments of student achievement. Findings were consistent with our cognitive model, and ACORNS was revealing about undergraduates' thinking about evolutionary change. Results indicated that (1) causally‐central concepts of evolution by natural selection typically co‐existed and competed with the presence of naïve ideas in all students' explanations, with naïve ideas being especially prevalent in low‐performers' explanations; (2) causally‐central concepts were elicited most frequently when students were asked to explain evolution of animals and familiar plants, with influence of superficial features being strongest for low‐performers; and (3) ACORNS scores accurately predicted students' later achievement in a college‐level evolution course. Together, findings illustrate usefulness of cognitive models in designing instruments intended to capture students' developing expertise. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 744–777, 2012 相似文献
19.
Sylvia Green 《Literacy》2001,35(2):74-81
This article explores the expectations of the National Literacy Framework (NLSF) and highlights some problem areas in the context of the National Curriculum (NC) for English. One such area relates to the assessment criteria which were selected from the framework to address children’s understanding of organisational features of texts in reading and writing. The aim of the CamPAS English Project (Cambridge Primary Assessment Scheme) was to develop materials to support teacher assessment at key stage 2, focusing on the text level strand of the National Literacy Framework. Assessment units were developed which were linked to criteria selected from the framework. The materials were trialled with key stage 2 children and the data analysis provided evidence about the factors which affected their performance in reading and writing in the context of the NLSF text level criteria. Analyses of pupil performance and the documentation of the NC and the NLSF suggested that there were problems in this curriculum area. 相似文献
20.
付有能 《课程.教材.教法》2021,41(5):74-81
“活动型学科课程”作为普通高中思想政治课程新的课程理念与学科定位,其实现需要通过教科书中的活动设计作为学科内容的载体和实践来支撑。普通高中思想政治教科书的活动设计可以从“有什么用”“怎么使用”“谁来使用”三个角度进行设计和理解,以此构成了“活动—内容—学科核心素养”(功能维度)、“活动—情境—议题”(实践维度)、“活动—学生—教师”(主体维度)三个层面的活动设计思路。以活动设计的这三个维度为指引,推进高中思想政治课教学形态的转变,从而在“活动型学科课程”理念的教科书呈现与教学落实上确立起行动共识。 相似文献