共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
探讨医学期刊的医学伦理审查问题。通过随机抽样调查分析32种医学期刊近2年的稿约(投稿须知)对医学伦理审查的要求情况及其所刊220篇论文对医学伦理审查的说明情况,结果表明：32种医学期刊稿约明确要求进行医学伦理审查的占比不高(56.3%),医学伦理审查要求不够统一、明确;所刊220篇论文对医学伦理审查说明的占比也不高(40.0%),医学伦理审查表现不够规范、严谨。因此需要不断提高医学期刊和作者对医学伦理审查的认识和责任意识,积极完善医学伦理审查的制度和措施,同时相关方面需加强协作共同完善医学伦理审查规范和机制,促进医学伦理审查的落实。 相似文献
2.
对中文核心医药期刊官网中的生物医学研究伦理审查制度建设现状进行调查分析,为加强我国生物医学研究伦理审查制度建设提供参考.从《中文核心期刊要目总览(2017年版)》收录的255种医药期刊中随机选取100种中文核心医药期刊作为研究对象,登录这100种医药期刊官网,对生物医学研究伦理审查要求进行分析.结果 表明:在100种中文核心医药期刊官网中,稿约或投稿指南对生物医学研究伦理审查有要求的期刊51种,其中对临床试验伦理审查要求最多(49种期刊),对提供临床试验注册号要求最少(12种期刊);官网主页设置"医学伦理"栏目的 只有10种期刊,其中对临床试验伦理审查与动物实验伦理审查要求最多(9种期刊),只有3种期刊有上传生物医学研究伦理审查办法文件.有6种期刊在稿约对生物医学研究伦理学有要求的同时,在主页也设置了"医学伦理"栏目.可见,中文核心期刊官网对生物医学研究伦理审查不够重视,应进一步加强医学伦理审查制度的建设.科技期刊编辑部应与国际接轨,学习国际著名期刊的做法,更新办刊理念;利用好官网提供生物医学研究伦理学习资源,对作者进行医学伦理教育;应制定统一的生物医学研究伦理审查规范. 相似文献
3.
文章选取国内外30种高影响力生物医学期刊作为研究对象,对其稿约中临床试验的五类伦理审查条目进行审核和分析。调查发现,10种国外期刊全部完整提及伦理学方面各项要求;10种被SCI收录的国内期刊（英文）,2种未完整提及伦理学方面各项要求;10种国内中文核心期刊,仅1种完整提及伦理学方面各项要求。研究指出国内中文生物医学期刊对稿约伦理审查要求相对较低,提出应通过注重把控研究关口、加强伦理规范和准则的宣传与使用、强调对临床试验研究的伦理要求、提升研究者伦理意识等途径,推动我国生物医学期刊伦理审查的规范化建设。 相似文献
4.
为提高医学期刊编辑的伦理审查意识，文章总结了医学期刊编辑在论文审查中常见的伦理学问题:临床研究型论文是否经过伦理委员会批准、患者知情同意，是否遵守隐私保护、保密原则及对照原则等；动物实验研究型论文能否遵守3R（替代、减少、优化）原则，保障动物福利，尽量减少实验动物的痛苦和死亡。提出以下对策:规范稿约中伦理审查相关规定，重视医学伦理学知识的普及和提高，充分发挥伦理学审稿专家的作用，与科研机构伦理委员会保持紧密联系。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
以医学编辑为视角,从选题的具体性、信息的全面性、研究对象的合理性、医学伦理的严肃性、研究设计方案的科学性和可行性、干预手段的正确性、临床研究的可行性、研究时长的合理性、研究效果的可预测性、经济支持的非直接利益等10个方面论述临床医学论文的选题评价。 相似文献
8.
中医药期刊作为中医药研究成果传播和交流的重要平台,应该重视对中医药研究的伦理审查.本研究对中医药期刊的医学伦理审查情况进行调查,发现部分中医药期刊对伦理审查不够重视,对伦理审查的要求缺乏明确规范,由此提出以下建议:中医药期刊应加强对医学伦理的重视,可在稿约或投稿指南中补充对伦理审查的要求,而且应明确相应规范,同时可在伦... 相似文献
9.
10.
生物医学研究涉及很多医学研究伦理内容,编辑对论文中医学研究伦理的把关至关重要。本文通过问卷调研了228名医学期刊编辑的生物医学研究伦理审核意识,发现编辑对相关的医学研究伦理问题不是很了解,并且只有53.07%的编辑会经常要求作者提供相关医学研究伦理证明材料,大多数编辑所在期刊对论文中医学研究伦理内容只是进行了形式上的检查,没有要求作者提供如伦理审批件等的原始证明材料。据此提出,医学期刊编辑应了解科研人员在生物医学研究中应当遵循的科研伦理规范,掌握期刊编辑出版中关于生物医学研究伦理要求,提高审稿时对医学研究伦理内容的审核程度,进而加强医学期刊编辑对生物医学研究伦理审核意识的建设。 相似文献
11.
Michel C. Atlas 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2004,92(2):242-250
Purpose: The purpose is to review the issue of retraction in the scientific literature and to examine the policies on retraction of major biomedical journals.Method: The historical background of this issue was investigated through a literature search. The Instructions to Authors of 122 major biomedical journals were reviewed for evidence of a policy on the retraction of articles. Editors of those journals with no mention of retraction in their Instructions to Authors were contacted by email and/or postal mail.Results: Sixty-two percent of the journals investigated did not post or report having a policy on issuing retractions. Only twenty-one (18%) did. The remainder did not post any policy and did not respond to inquiries.Discussion: Including policies in Instructions to Authors relating to the principled conduct of research and publication will improve the ethical environment in which the scientific community works. 相似文献
12.
高校学报《稿约》与编辑的法律意识 总被引：6，自引：3，他引：3
调查了2001年出版的200份高校学报刊登《稿约)的情况。结果发现，对《稿约》普遍重视不够。讨论《稿约》存在的2个问题，印形式上的随意性与内容的不完整性，而这正反映出高校学报编辑著作权法意识的缺乏。 相似文献
13.
Penetration of Nigerian predatory biomedical open access journals 2007–2012: a bibliometric study 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 This paper presents the bibliometric characteristics of 32 biomedical open access journals published by Academic Journals and International Research Journals – the two Nigerian publishers in Jeffery Beall's list of 23 predatory open access publishers in 2012. Data about the journals and the authors of their articles were collected from the websites of the publishers, Google Scholar and Web of Science. As at December 2012, the journals had together produced a total of 5,601 papers written by 5,599 authors, and received 12,596 citations. Authors from Asia accounted for 56.79% of the publications; those from Africa wrote 28.35% while Europe contributed 7.78%. Authors from Africa accounted for 18.25% of the citations these journals received, and this is about one‐third the number of citations by authors in Asia (54.62%). At country level, India ranks first in the top 10 citer countries, while Nigeria, the host country of the journals, ranked eighth. More in‐depth studies are required to develop further information about the journals such as how much scientific information the journals contain, as well as the science literacy of the authors and the editorial. 相似文献
14.
5种医学期刊中经济利益冲突问题的调查及分析 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
为了解我国医学期刊中经济利益冲突问题的现状并与国外期刊进行比较,审查了中华医学会系列杂志中5种医学期刊1990、1995、2000年的全部述评和评论、论著、论著摘要、综述和讲座及其他涉及潜在经济利益冲突的文章,以及这5种期刊稿约中关于经济利益冲突方面对作者的政策,结果令人遗憾.认为编辑应提高对医学期刊中经济利益冲突问题的认识,有关部门应制定明确的制度,以杜绝由经济利益冲突所致的科研结果报道中的偏差. 相似文献
15.
229 Chinese‐language biomedical journals from A Guide to The Core Journals of China were investigated for their guidance on 14 ethical issues. The issues of authorship, duplicate submission, privacy and confidentiality, and integrity of the data were mentioned in more than 50% of the journals. Except for the issues of authorship and protection of animals in research, significant differences were found between Chinese Medical Association Publishing House (CMAPH) journals (n = 67) and non‐CMAPH journals (n = 162) (P < 0.05). 66 of the 229 journals did not update their instructions for authors regularly. 196 journal instructions listed authorship criteria, while the other 33 did not. Clinical trial registration policy was required by 26 (11.3%) journals, among which the CONSORT statement for randomized trials was required by 23, and only one journal guided the authors to work in line with the EQUATOR Network. The study concludes that the situation of publishing ethics in the instructions for authors of Chinese biomedical journals is not favorable, and that Chinese biomedical editors should learn more about publishing ethics in order to reduce opportunities for publication problems. 相似文献
16.
中国作者对发表SCI论文有巨大的需求,但目前SCIE收录的中国期刊数量较少,且总体水平未达到世界平均水平。将SCI-E收录的中国期刊根据语种和论文作者的国籍进行分类后发现:甲类期刊(以中文刊载的论文大于50%)和乙类期刊(发表论文的作者至少50%来自中国,且至少50%的论文以英文形式发表)学术水平未达到国际平均水平,2001—2011年期间变化不大;但乙类期刊是SCI-E收录的中国期刊中的绝大多数。丙类期刊(其刊载的论文至少50%是以英文发表的,且至少50%的论文第一作者为非中国作者)引用指数(JCS)逐年上升,上升幅度明显,2011年超过国际平均水平。说明通过改变语种不能提高期刊的国际影响力。在这3类期刊中,丙类年刊均载文量最低,为117.27篇/刊,2007后呈逐年下降趋势,2011年甚至降至91.07篇/刊。中国被SCI-E收录的期刊数量少,与国内发表SCI论文的巨大需求,以及中国期刊走上国际舞台,发挥更大的学术影响力的需求差距甚远,的确有必要创办更多的英文科技期刊;但是在此过程中,有必要慎重评价SCI-E收录期刊的学术影响力和作用。 相似文献
17.
In the present study we have tried to trace the growth of malaria research at Global Level and the distribution of articles in various journals for the period 1955–2005. The data have been extracted from a database, which has been developed in-house from MEDLINE, SCI, TDB, Ovid Heath Information and Indian Science Abstracts. Study indicates that the exponential model fits the data on journals, articles and authors. The R2 value for the trend for journals, articles, and authors are 0.9502, 0.9475, and 0.9651, respectively. The growth rates for journals, articles and authors are 5.31%, 7.38%, and 10.06%, respectively. The linear multiple regression equation that Articles = ?39.2771 + 3.61719*journals + 0.085882*Authors (R2 = 99.16%) is most meaningful and it may be used to estimate the articles for given numbers of journals and authors. 相似文献
18.
伦理学渗透在医药学科研究的全过程,因研究对象的特殊性,期刊编辑需要在初审、修稿阶段对医药学术论文进行伦理审查,最大限度减少因伦理问题处理不当造成论文刊发后撤稿情况的发生。本文从稿约中明确要求作者说明和建议作者/研究者充分注意的伦理要求2方面,总结对医药学术论文的伦理审查要点,并提供案例分享经验,为医药学术期刊编辑伦理审查提供参考。 相似文献
19.
Elke BARTHOLOMÄUS Sandy GOLDBECK‐WOOD Meike SEWERING Christopher BAETHGE 《Learned Publishing》2015,28(4):283-291
Bilingual publishing has become a strategy employed by journals from the non‐Anglophone world to gain wider recognition. Beyond anecdotal evidence, however, there are no published accounts of the experiences of editors and authors of bilingual journals with the process of bilingual publication. It is also unclear how authors writing in bilingual journals judge the quality of the translations and whether they consider this sort of publishing as beneficial for their aims. Consequently, we carried out two surveys: one among editors of bilingual journals and one anonymous survey among authors and translators of articles published in Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, the bilingual journal of the German Medical Association. Eight of nine journals as well as 233 of 353 authors and 4 of 6 translators took part. Most journals reported that bilingual publication helped in becoming indexed in important databases (e.g. Medline), receiving or improving an Impact Factor, and in attracting authors. All journals plan to continue publishing bilingually. Authors were ‘satisfied’ (40.8%) or ‘very satisfied’ (57.8%) with translations. Almost all (96.7%) were in favour of bilingual publication of their work. They did not view an English translation as an obstacle to another related English language paper. Translators highlighted challenges relating to specialized terminology and to terms specific to the regional healthcare system. 相似文献