基于“立德树人”的我国青少年体育品德评价指标体系构建研究     

汤利军  蔡皓 《武汉体育学院学报》2019,53(10):75-80

运用文献资料法、问卷调查法、德尔菲法、层次分析法等研究方法，以人的全面发展理论、马斯洛的需要层次理论、道德认知发展心理学理论为基础，以国家出台的各类关于学生道德、品德发展的文件、中小学生手册和奥林匹克精神等为依据，构建出青少年体育品德评价指标体系。指标体系包括体育精神、体育品格、体育道德行为3个一级指标，爱国主义精神、集体主义精神、竞争开拓精神、拼搏进取精神、团队合作精神、创新精神、法制精神、爱、志、信、义、体育道德意应能力、体育道德创造能力和体育道德自我教育能力14个二级指标，并采用层次分析法分析出各指标的权重。青少年体育品德评价指标体系具有一定的科学性、适用性及操作性。  相似文献   

大健康视野下老年功能性力量评估——以武汉市老年太极人群为例     

肖剑  邹克宁  李小兰 《武汉体育学院学报》2019,53(2):74-80

采用文献法、测试法、数理统计等方法，以武汉市十三个行政区内528名以太极拳为主要体育健身方式的老年人为样本，以马步蹲起、弓箭步蹲起、肘撑侧桥、肘撑侧桥举腿等与日常生活活动相关联的四个基础动作为测试内容。研究表明，受试人群普遍存在下肢与躯干的功能性力量不足、左右侧肌肉链力量不均衡的问题。虽然样本人群经常进行以太极拳为主要形式的体育锻炼，但在锻炼过程中侧重于套路技能的演练，对功能性力量训练的认识不足及缺乏相应的训练方法，存在科学性盲区，需要引起重视。  相似文献   

The Ultimate Survey: Asking One Question at a Time to Get Feedback from Library Users     

Leticia Camacho  Brian Wages  Taylor Harris 《The Reference Librarian》2020,61(1):1-14

ABSTRACT

Libraries use surveys and other instruments to gather feedback from their users. However, with competition from many other campus entities requesting input, how can survey fatigue be avoided? To gather this feedback, the Social Sciences Reference Desk utilized a short, fun and easy method. Each week for 10 weeks during the fall semester of 2017, the reference assistants wrote a survey question on a whiteboard and provided sticky notes for patrons to write their answers. The survey provided valuable information about patrons’ needs and expectations. It also fostered changes that were easily implemented to improve the delivery of library services.  相似文献   

普通高校体育教学评价多元化模式分析     

高航 《体育科技文献通报》2020,(4):82-82,84

体育教学评价本身是体育教学中不可或缺的部分,同时也有利于对体育教学的质量进行相对科学、合理的评估。对于体育教学改革而言,完善教学理论研究,采取多元化评价模式已成为未来改革的重要方向,同时制订专业的教学评价指标体系,从模型构建的过程中探究其具体应用方法。  相似文献   

Early career mathematics teachers: Concepts,methods, and strategies for comparative international research     

《Teaching and Teacher Education》2020

In this article, we report on the challenges entailed in the development of concepts, methods, and strategies for designing and implementing a cross-national research study of the first-years of school-mathematics teaching, including an exploration of how beginning mathematics teachers differ in their preparation, knowledge for teaching, teaching practice, working conditions, and pupil characteristics. The study was designed as a proof-of-concept for a study of teaching and teacher education to be implemented by educationalists, teacher educators, and early career teachers as an ongoing professional endeavor. Primary among the challenges was the development of the sampling design and the construction of measures.  相似文献   

数字图书馆信息服务的融合与创新——基于2019年JCDL年会论文的综述     

梁少博  吴丹 《图书情报知识》2020,(3):97-108

[目的/意义]本文通过对2019年国际数字图书馆联合会议(Joint Conference on Digital Library,JCDL)的录用论文进行整体回顾,梳理了本届年会的最新研究成果与学科发展动态,以助国内图情领域学者更好地了解本届年会成果,把握国际数字图书馆领域研究的前沿热点问题。[研究设计/方法]采用文献综述的方法进行研究。[结论/发现]本届年会更加关注数字图书馆如何通过多源数据的融合、数字人文馆藏资源的利用等实现信息服务深度融合;数字图书馆如何通过海量大数据挖掘与利用、用户行为分析提升其服务水平;如何通过对学术文本资源深入挖掘,实现信息计量学在学术评审、学术评价等方面的创新应用。[创新/价值]本文揭示了国际数字图书馆领域的最新发展态势,展望了未来数字图书馆领域的学术前沿方向。  相似文献   

Investigating Student Perceptions of a Dissection-Based Undergraduate Gross Anatomy Course Using Q Methodology     

Jessica N. Byram  Jason M. Organ  Michael Yard  Naomi A. Schmalz 《Anatomical sciences education》2020,13(2):149-157

The demand for upper-level undergraduate dissection-based anatomy courses is growing, as professional programs require more advanced anatomy training prior to matriculation. To address this need, Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM) partnered with Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis—a large, urban, life science-focused campus nearby to IUSM—to offer an undergraduate, dissection-based course in regional gross anatomy. Because this is a new course, a deeper post-course evaluation of student perceptions was conducted using Q methodology. In this study, Q methodology was used to evaluate student views of the overall course structure, pre-laboratory materials and activities, assessments, and quality of instruction. Of the 15 students in the spring semester 2018 cohort, 80% (n = 12) participated in the evaluation, and 10 of those students followed up with written explanations for their rationale in selecting the four statements with which they most strongly agreed and disagreed. The Q methodology sorted the students into one of three statistically significant groups: Motivated Dissectors (n = 6), Traditional Students (n = 3), and Inspired Learners (n = 3). Motivated Dissectors and Inspired Learners felt strongly that the course did not encourage self-directed learning and that the pre-laboratory materials were not adequate to prepare them for quizzes. Traditional Students, however, disagreed, having a favorable opinion of the pre-laboratory materials, even though this group felt most strongly that the amount of material covered in the course was overwhelming. This study demonstrates the utility of Q methodology to evaluate courses to elucidate student perspectives and inform future course modifications.  相似文献   

我国学校体育场地建设效率研究     

孙成林  王健 《武汉体育学院学报》2020,54(2):44-52

基于第六次全国体育场地普查基础数据，运用数据包络分析法，对我国学校体育场地建设效率进行研究。结果显示：在样本期内，学校体育场地建设的综合技术效率均值为0.606、纯技术效率均值为0.758、规模效率均值为0.787，较之DEA最优值1，我国学校体育场地的建设效率不高；以非DEA有效为标准，从综合技术效率看，学校体育场地建设效率呈现东部高于西部、西部高于中部地区的态势，场地建设投入决策单元的整体效率水平不高；从纯技术效率看，体育场地建设效率呈现西部高于东部、东部高于中部地区的态势，场地建设投入要素的管理和技术水平有较大提升空间；从规模效率看，体育场地建设效率呈现与综合技术效率同样的态势，且全国有23个省体育场地建设处于规模效益递减状态，场地建设投入资源的配置效率不高。分析表明我国学校体育场地建设效率低的原因主要在于场地建设投入资金的结构不合理、区域间体育资源的配置不合理、体育用地开发利用的"二维平面延展"局限性等。建议：在财政经费投入上采用差异化的财政投入政策，在区域性资源配置上合理配置区域间学校体育场地建设投入资源，在土地资源开发利用上注重学校体育用地的"三维立体化"开发等举措，以提高我国学校体育场地的建设效率。  相似文献   

质性评价:另一种学生学业评价方法     

苑毅 《教育教学论坛》2020,(19):360-361

量化评价是基于自然科学主义观点对学生学业开展评价,它将学生作为统一的整体忽略了个体之间的差异,而基于人文主义的质性评价则注重学生之间的个体差异。质性评价为职业教育中的学业评价提供了另一种好思路,值得研究和推广。  相似文献   

Towards a Framework for Evaluating the Research Performance of Chinese Double First-Class Universities     

XU Changqing 《Frontiers of Education in China》2020,15(3):369

The study focuses on the research performance of Double First-Class (DFC) universities in China. A theoretical framework based on economic theory and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for a novel evaluation model is proposed. The model is performed on a sample of 41 participant DFC universities in China. Using data collected from these universities, it was found that there is no consistency between performance ranking, input ranking, and output ranking, with the best ranked universities far from the most efficient. These findings provide empirical evidence of DFC universities’ research performance situation and suggest strategies that the government can use to propel their sustainable development.  相似文献