共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
刘广利 《漯河职业技术学院学报》2011,10(2):72-73
发展性学校评价理念在落实的过程中存在动力缺失的问题,究其原因,主要有：评价主体对发展性学校评价的认识存在偏差、评价反馈环节薄弱、组织缺失和合作文化缺乏以及内部评价与外部评价失衡等,为了有效激发评价动力,需要从以下几点着手：正确认识发展性学校评价、完善评价机制、注重校内合作文化建设、加强内外部评价之间真诚对话等。 相似文献
2.
数学教学的发展性评价探讨 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
全美数学教师理事会(NCTM)非常注重学校数学评价问题,提出的具体评价标准包括:数学标准(The mathematics standard)、学习标准(The learning standard)、公平标准(The equity standard)、开放标准(The openness standard)、推断标准(The inferences standard)和关联标准(The coherence standard)等,并且对数学教学评价的理念和方法都作了比较深入的探讨.我国也开始研究发展性评价等理论和方法,由于综合评价的指标体系的广泛使用,发展性评价始终没有得到真正的贯彻实施.针对这种问题,研究者已经提出了很多评价技术,比如质的评价、成长记录袋评价等.本文从评价科学性的角度分析目前教学评价存在的问题,供大家探讨. 相似文献
3.
周效章 《四川职业技术学院学报》2014,24(5)
发展性评价作为一种新的教育评价理念,对于促进学生全面的、多元的发展具有重要意义。文章在明确发展性评价理念蕴涵的基础上,深入分析了新课程评价改革的现实要求与中学信息技术教学评价的现状,并结合评价理念、评价标准、评价内容、评价主体、评价手段等五个"转向"阐述了发展性评价在中学信息技术教学中的实施策略。 相似文献
4.
张文珍 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》2010,32(6)
教师发展性评价是一种形成性评价,确立了发展性评价的理念,建立了发展性评价的机制,制订全面的评价内容和标准和采取多样化的评价方法,最后阐述了对教师发展性评价实践的几点思考. 相似文献
5.
发展性学校评价作为一种新的评价理念,近年来正在受到广大教育工作者的关注与接纳。本文通过对"上海市幼儿园分等定级评估"项目的多年实践,探索性地运用发展性学校评价的理念,从制度设计、标准导向、过程管理、实践反思等多方位对发展性评价进行了诠释。 相似文献
6.
杨东 《太原大学教育学院学报》2005,23(3):8-11
以往的学生评价存在评价理念滞后、评价方法绝对、评价主体单一、评价功能偏失等弊端,发展性的学生评价思想是解决这些问题的对策之一.它有两个基本特点以学生为本、注重全面发展.要正确理解发展性的学生评价必须关注三个问题第四代教育评价思想;发展性评价和形成性评价;学生评价的价值主体是学生. 相似文献
7.
对我国发展性教师评价体系的探讨 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
当前,各高校普遍采用的教师评价体系存在着评价目标功利化、评价内容简单化、评价标准统一化、评价动力单向化等问题,已不能完全适应发展的需要.全面引入发展性教师评价理念并分析其特点,探讨该项制度在我国的适用性及需要注意的问题,对推进我国教育事业的长远发展具有重要意义. 相似文献
8.
关于发展性学生评价的思考 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
杨东 《太原教育学院学报》2005,23(3):8-11
以往的学生评价存在评价理念滞后、评价方法绝对、评价主体单一、评价功能偏失等弊端,发展性的学生评价思想是解决这些问题的对策之一.它有两个基本特点：以学生为本、注重全面发展.要正确理解发展性的学生评价必须关注三个问题：第四代教育评价思想;发展性评价和形成性评价;学生评价的价值主体是学生. 相似文献
9.
论发展性课程评价制度建设 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
发展性课程评价制度是指在课程评价的目的、主体、内容、过程以及结果的解释与运用等方面以发展的理念和方式来展开的课程评价制度.它是当前我国课程改革深入发展的现实选择.建设发展性课程评价制度.需要树立发展性课程评价理念、扩展课程评价视域、确立多元主体的课程意识、建立相对独立的课程评价机构或组织等. 相似文献
10.
基于高校教学团队的人才发展性评价研究 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
发展性评价的实施不仅有利于大学教学质量的提高,而且有利于教师的职业发展,实施发展性评价已成为世界教师职业发展的共同趋势。当前高校在实施发展性评价中存在课堂教学评价的边缘化、评价中主体性缺失、发展性功能不明显等问题,教学团队因其具备有利于教师的团体性合作、促使教师评价主体的良好效能感的形成、有利于教师专业对话的开展等优势,而成为高校教学团队人才实施发展性评价的主要组织形式。 相似文献
11.
12.
心理教育评价是一个亟待探索的新领域,心理教育评价涵盖目标评价、过程评价和结果评价。评价应注重综合性、情境性和对话式,评价中则要充分考虑评价的教育性、发展性、主体性、客观性和全面性。心理教育评价标准可以从教师、学生、教育过程三个维度制定,心理档案袋是心理教育评价的有效方式之一。 相似文献
13.
Janet McIntyre‐Mills 《Educational Action Research》2013,21(2):245-251
The aim of this action research project was to identify criteria that would best represent competent teaching and incorporate these within an effective teaching appraisal process. An initial literature review provided broad criteria of the process of teaching which had been shown by research to have fostered student learning. These criteria were structured within an initial proposal for an appraisal framework and were shared with staff at. a seminar in the Faculty of Health Studies at the Auckland Institute of Technology. Twelve staff representing six of the departments subsequently volunteered to participate in a research group to further develop this appraisal framework and the appraisal processes. The researcher used the action research processes of collaboration, power sharing and critical reflection to maximise the quality of and the commitment to the new appraisal procedures. This appraisal model features four dimensions of the teaching process which have been differentiated from the wider duties of a teacher's role. It was implemented in the Faculty promotion round, evaluated, and further upgraded for re‐implementation in the following year. The project has resolved several theoretical problems related to evaluating teaching. It has also produced a framework of valid appraisal criteria which can be used to effectively evaluate the quality of teaching. This appraisal process is considered to be based upon generalisable knowledge which could be utilised by other teaching organisations. 相似文献
14.
教育评价是判断教育价值的活动,它对教育发展有着很强的导向作用。在我国推进素质教育的过程中,教育评价发展相对滞后。贯彻发展性教育评价理念,必须加强教育评价建设,在分析农村教育评价现状的基础上探讨了加强农村教育评价建设的意义、内容和策略。 相似文献
15.
Portfolio appraisal: In search of criteria 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Two inherently contradictory forces are pushing for reform in portfolio assessment. On the one hand there is a felt need for creating more rigid standards that operate to promote uniformity of ratings in appraisal practice to certify achievement. However, on the other hand, critical questions are being raised about separating acclaimed portfolio goals aimed both at appraising achievement while also improving quality of student learning and development. The position of portfolio assessment, which is widely used nowadays in teaching and teacher education, comes into debate. In our study, we look for actual practices in portfolio appraisal in search of criteria used for rating the quality of portfolio materials. It is our interest to find out how appraisal criteria are selected and used to evaluate achievement or to improve the quality of development and learning. In the context of teacher education, we have examined both the espoused criteria of both assessors and collectors of portfolios as well as the actual appraisal practices by looking at the judgmental orientations and supervision styles used by portfolio assessors. In addition, we offered an authentic portfolio document to be rated by different assessors to gauge and compare their quality of rating and criteria use. The actual processes we detected point to a most common practice of employing judgmental, usually normative evaluations based on assessor dependent, more or less pre-decided criteria which permit a “checkbox” approach to appraisal. 相似文献
16.
原素芳 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》2013,(2):111-113
借助绩效评价的观点,对高职实践课程标准进行系统研究,从高职实践课程的设置标准、课程的内容选择标准和课程的实施标准三方面建立绩效评价体系,根据评价结果设置和调整高职实践课程标准。 相似文献
17.
李丽 《广东轻工职业技术学院学报》2008,7(2):27-30
本文分析了我国旅游企业卓越绩效评价的基本内容及其要求,提出了评价指标设置原则和方法,从领导、战略、顾客与市场、资源、过程管理、测量、分析与改进、经营结果等方面进行了卓越绩效评价指标的选择和设计。 相似文献
18.
《Journal of Further & Higher Education》2012,36(3):74-80
Abstract This paper argues that the scheme of appraisal agreed between NATFHE and college employers is capable of implementation in a developmental manner that is compatible with the ideal of further education teaching being a professional practice. It outlines a case study of the innovation of one appraisal scheme at a College in the south west, identifying the key elements of the scheme that give it a developmental emphasis and some elements which inhibit it. 相似文献
19.
As research on student evaluations of teaching (SET) has dominated our understanding of teaching evaluation, debate over SET implementation has turned attention away from basic principles for appraising employee performance as established in human resources literature. Considering SET research and its practical significance in isolation from relevant human resources literature not only risks unlawful remedies for issues such as bias in SET but also risks replacing one form of bias with another. Meanwhile, the full potential of human resources tools to support consistent evaluation of teaching remains unrealized. To address this gap, this article clarifies how teaching evaluation can be conducted as sound performance appraisal by deploying SET and peer review of teaching within a larger framework of established human resources techniques. A review of recent literature articulates prominent themes in research on SET and peer review of teaching and outlines key principles for performance appraisal and performance management. Those principles are used to analyze representative faculty evaluation policies and procedures and clarify the weaknesses of both traditional and recently revised approaches to teaching evaluation. The final section elaborates performance appraisal techniques relevant to teaching evaluation. These include planful use of results and/or behavior approaches to performance appraisal, robust rating instruments for behavioral performance appraisal, targeted collection of information from multiple stakeholders, and job analysis. Efforts to de-emphasize quantitative SET data to address issues such as bias can be strengthened through the incorporation of performance appraisal tools that clearly articulate performance criteria and standards and that gather both qualitative and quantitative data on employee performance. 相似文献
20.
贺斌 《河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2006,8(1):123-128
信息技术校本课程评价迫在眉睫。它是在学校的基础上进行的,面向学生、教师和课程本身的评价,是面向过程的形成性、发展性和开放性评价。应努力坚持校本课程评价的6大基本原则,付诸信息技术学业评价实践,实现评价的民主化、人性化、科学化。 相似文献